Literature DB >> 26067392

Measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs.

Elke Karin Altpeter1, Tobias Marx, Nhung Xuan Nguyen, Aline Naumann, Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the influence of text length (single sentence versus a paragraph of several sentences) on the repeatability of reading speed measurements in normal-sighted subjects.
METHODS: We compared reading speeds for the German versions of the Radner charts (single sentences of 14 words each) and the International Reading Speed Texts (IReST) charts (paragraphs, on average 132 words) in 30 normal-sighted elderly subjects aged 51-81 years (mean 64.5 years ± 7.2 SD). Three texts each of both lengths were read aloud in random order. The influence of text length (single sentence or paragraph) and text sample (each single text) on reading speed was calculated by a regression model and Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: Mean reading speed (words per minute) showed no significant difference for single sentences (170 wpm ± 33 SD) and paragraphs (167 wpm ±31 SD). Differences in reading speeds within one type of reading material were higher between single sentences than between paragraphs. Correlation coefficients between speeds were higher for paragraphs (r = 0.96-0.98) than for single sentences (r = 0.69-0.78). Variations between reading speeds for three texts of each length were markedly lower for paragraphs than for single sentences: (median, interquartile range [IQR]): 6.7, IQR 13.9; 3.0, IQR 8.3; -2.0, IQR 9.7 versus -8.8, IQR 29.6; 15.6, IQR 29.4; 22.7, IQR 19.4, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Since reading speeds assessed with paragraphs show lower variance among texts than those for single sentences, they are better suited for repeated measurements, especially for long-term monitoring of the course of reading performance and for assessing effects of interventions in subjects with reading disorders.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26067392     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3065-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  15 in total

1.  Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability.

Authors:  Eva Stifter; Franz König; Thomas Lang; Peter Bauer; Sibylla Richter-Müksch; Michaela Velikay-Parel; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Standardized assessment of reading performance: the New International Reading Speed Texts IReST.

Authors:  Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski; Klaus Dietz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: it depends where you're coming from.

Authors:  Christopher J Hand; Sébastien Miellet; Patrick J O'Donnell; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test.

Authors:  G E Legge; J A Ross; A Luebker; J M LaMay
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  The development of reading speed in Italians with dyslexia: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  P E Tressoldi; G Stella; M Faggella
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

6.  New standardised texts for assessing reading performance in four European languages.

Authors:  G A Hahn; D Penka; C Gehrlich; A Messias; M Weismann; L Hyvärinen; M Leinonen; M Feely; G Rubin; C Dauxerre; F Vital-Durand; S Featherston; K Dietz; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

8.  Word length and word frequency affect eye movements in dyslexic children reading in a regular (German) orthography.

Authors:  Ute Dürrwächter; Alexander N Sokolov; Jens Reinhard; Gunther Klosinski; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2010-03-12

9.  English sentence optotypes for measuring reading acuity and speed--the English version of the Radner Reading Charts.

Authors:  W Radner; G Diendorfer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reply to the letter to the editor: "Incorrect use and presentation of Radner reading charts: comment on measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs".

Authors:  Elke Karin Altpeter; Tobias Marx; Nhung Xuan Nguyen; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The Impact of Diplopia on Reading.

Authors:  Beckie Lijka; Sonia Toor; Gemma Arblaster
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2019-01-21

3.  Trial of infographics in Northern Ireland (TINI): Preliminary evaluation and results of a randomized controlled trial comparing infographics with text.

Authors:  Alan David McCrorie; Jingwen Jessica Chen; Ross Weller; Kieran John McGlade; Conan Donnelly
Journal:  Cogent Med       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  Design and Validation of a New Smartphone-Based Reading Speed App (GDRS-Test) for the Greek Speaking Population.

Authors:  Diamantis Almaliotis; Georgios P Athanasopoulos; Stavroula Almpanidou; Eleni P Papadopoulou; Vasileios Karampatakis
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-08-02

5.  Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases.

Authors:  Michael Oeverhaus; Dirk Dekowski; Herbert Hirche; Joachim Esser; Barbara Schaperdoth-Gerlings; Anja Eckstein
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.209

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.