Literature DB >> 16547331

New standardised texts for assessing reading performance in four European languages.

G A Hahn1, D Penka, C Gehrlich, A Messias, M Weismann, L Hyvärinen, M Leinonen, M Feely, G Rubin, C Dauxerre, F Vital-Durand, S Featherston, K Dietz, S Trauzettel-Klosinski.   

Abstract

AIMS: To develop standardised texts for assessing reading speed during repeated measurements and across languages for normal subjects and low vision patients.
METHODS: 10 texts were designed by linguistic experts in English, Finnish, French, and German. The texts were at the level of a sixth grade reading material (reading ages 10-12 years) and were matched for length (830 (plus or minus 2) characters) and syntactic complexity, according to the syntactic prediction locality theory of Gibson. 100 normally sighted native speaking volunteers aged 18-35 years (25 per language) read each text aloud in randomised order. The newly designed text battery was then applied to test the reading performance of 100 normally sighted native speaking volunteers aged 60-85 years (25 per language).
RESULTS: Reading speed was not significantly different with at least seven texts in all four languages. The maximum reading speed difference between texts, in the same language was 6.8% (Finnish). Average reading speeds (SD) in characters per minute are, for the young observer group: English 1234 (147), Finnish 1263 (142), French 1214 (152), German 1126 (105). The group of older readers showed statistically significant lower average reading speeds: English 951 (97), Finnish 1014 (179), French 1131 (160), German 934 (117).
CONCLUSION: The authors have developed a set of standardised, homogeneous, and comparable texts in four European languages (English, Finnish, French, German). These texts will be a valuable tool for measuring reading speed in international studies in the field of reading and low vision research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16547331      PMCID: PMC1857021          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.087379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  11 in total

1.  The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed.

Authors:  Wolfgang Radner; Wilfried Obermayer; Sibylla Richter-Mueksch; Ulrike Willinger; Michaela Velikay-Parel; Brigitte Eisenwort
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-03-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Fixation width and fixation frequency of the contours presented in reading].

Authors:  E AULHORN
Journal:  Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere       Date:  1953

3.  Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test.

Authors:  G E Legge; J A Ross; A Luebker; J M LaMay
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  [A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed].

Authors:  W Radner; U Willinger; W Obermayer; C Mudrich; M Velikay-Parel; B Eisenwort
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  S T Chung; J S Mansfield; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

7.  Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision.

Authors:  J S Mansfield; G E Legge; M C Bane
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well; A Pollatsek; J H Bertera
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-06

9.  Scanning characters and reading with a central scotoma.

Authors:  R W Cummings; S G Whittaker; G R Watson; J M Budd
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1985-12

10.  Psychophysics of reading--XIII. Predictors of magnifier-aided reading speed in low vision.

Authors:  S J Ahn; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  27 in total

1.  [Spectrum of ophthalmologic and social rehabilitation at the Tübinger Low-Vision Clinic : a retrospective analysis for 1999-2005].

Authors:  N X Nguyen; M Weismann; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs.

Authors:  Elke Karin Altpeter; Tobias Marx; Nhung Xuan Nguyen; Aline Naumann; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Design of short Italian sentences to assess near vision performance.

Authors:  Antonio Calossi; Laura Boccardo; Alessandro Fossetti; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-06-21

4.  Comparison of reading speed with 3 different log-scaled reading charts.

Authors:  Noor Halilah Buari; Ai-Hong Chen; Nuraini Musa
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-01-28

5.  Chapter 8 - Restoring Vision to the Blind: Evaluating Visual Function, Endpoints.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Description and validation of a test to evaluate sustained silent reading.

Authors:  Pradeep Y Ramulu; Bonnielin K Swenor; Joan L Jefferys; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Severity of vision loss interacts with word-specific features to impact out-loud reading in glaucoma.

Authors:  Priya M Mathews; Gary S Rubin; Michael McCloskey; Sherveen Salek; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  [The influence of visual rehabilitation on secondary depressive disorders due to age-related macular degeneration. A randomized controlled pilot study].

Authors:  A Mielke; K Wirkus; R Niebler; G Eschweiler; N X Nguyen; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Digital reader vs print media: the role of digital technology in reading accuracy in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  K Gill; A Mao; A M Powell; T Sheidow
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Difficulty with out-loud and silent reading in glaucoma.

Authors:  Pradeep Y Ramulu; Bonnielin K Swenor; Joan L Jefferys; David S Friedman; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.