Literature DB >> 22661485

Standardized assessment of reading performance: the New International Reading Speed Texts IReST.

Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski1, Klaus Dietz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a need for standardized texts to assess reading performance, for multiple equivalent texts for repeated measurements, and for texts equated across languages for multi-language studies. Paragraphs are preferable to single sentences for accurate speed measurement. We developed such texts previously in 6 languages. The aim of our current study was to develop texts in more languages for a wide range of countries and users, and to assess the reading speeds of normally-sighted readers.
METHODS: Ten texts were designed for 17 languages each by a linguist who matched content, length, difficulty, and linguistic complexity. The texts then were used to assess reading speeds of 436 normally-sighted native speakers (age 18-35 years, 25 per language, 36 in Japanese), presented at a distance of 40 cm and size 1 M, that is 10-point Times New Roman font. Reading time (aloud) was measured by stopwatch.
RESULTS: For all 17 languages, average mean reading speed was 1.42 ± 0.13 texts/min (±SD), 184 ± 29 words/min, 370 ± 80 syllables/min, and 863 ± 234 characters/min. For 14 languages, mean reading time was 68 ms/character (95% confidence interval [CI] 65-71 ms). Our analysis focussed on words per minute. The variability of reading speed within subjects accounts only for an average of 11.5%, between subjects for 88.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: The low within-subject variability shows the equivalence of the texts. The IReST (second edition) can now be provided in 17 languages allowing standardized assessment of reading speed, as well as comparability of results before and after interventions, and is a useful tool for multi-language studies (for further information see www.amd-read.net).

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661485     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  48 in total

1.  [Visual rehabilitation training for homonymous field defects].

Authors:  S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Learning to read upside-down: a study of perceptual expertise and its acquisition.

Authors:  Elsa Ahlén; Charlotte S Hills; Hashim M Hanif; Cristina Rubino; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs.

Authors:  Elke Karin Altpeter; Tobias Marx; Nhung Xuan Nguyen; Aline Naumann; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Design of short Italian sentences to assess near vision performance.

Authors:  Antonio Calossi; Laura Boccardo; Alessandro Fossetti; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-06-21

5.  Assessment of the Apple iPad as a low-vision reading aid.

Authors:  E Morrice; A P Johnson; J-A Marinier; W Wittich
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  14th EUNOS Congress: PORTO, PORTUGAL, 16-19 JUNE 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2019-06-07

7.  Adding access to a video magnifier to standard vision rehabilitation: initial results on reading performance and well-being from a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Mary Lou Jackson; Kimberly A Schoessow; Alexandra Selivanova; Jennifer Wallis
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-31

Review 8.  Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision.

Authors:  Lucy Barker; Rachel Thomas; Gary Rubin; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-04

9.  [The influence of visual rehabilitation on secondary depressive disorders due to age-related macular degeneration. A randomized controlled pilot study].

Authors:  A Mielke; K Wirkus; R Niebler; G Eschweiler; N X Nguyen; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.