Literature DB >> 27791330

Current limitations and recommendations to improve testing for the environmental assessment of endocrine active substances.

Katherine K Coady1, Ronald C Biever2, Nancy D Denslow3, Melanie Gross4, Patrick D Guiney5, Henrik Holbech6, Natalie K Karouna-Renier7, Ioanna Katsiadaki8, Hank Krueger9, Steven L Levine10, Gerd Maack11, Mike Williams12, Jeffrey C Wolf13, Gerald T Ankley14.   

Abstract

In the present study, existing regulatory frameworks and test systems for assessing potential endocrine active chemicals are described, and associated challenges are discussed, along with proposed approaches to address these challenges. Regulatory frameworks vary somewhat across geographies, but all basically evaluate whether a chemical possesses endocrine activity and whether this activity can result in adverse outcomes either to humans or to the environment. Current test systems include in silico, in vitro, and in vivo techniques focused on detecting potential endocrine activity, and in vivo tests that collect apical data to detect possible adverse effects. These test systems are currently designed to robustly assess endocrine activity and/or adverse effects in the estrogen, androgen, and thyroid hormone signaling pathways; however, there are some limitations of current test systems for evaluating endocrine hazard and risk. These limitations include a lack of certainty regarding: 1) adequately sensitive species and life stages; 2) mechanistic endpoints that are diagnostic for endocrine pathways of concern; and 3) the linkage between mechanistic responses and apical, adverse outcomes. Furthermore, some existing test methods are resource intensive with regard to time, cost, and use of animals. However, based on recent experiences, there are opportunities to improve approaches to and guidance for existing test methods and to reduce uncertainty. For example, in vitro high-throughput screening could be used to prioritize chemicals for testing and provide insights as to the most appropriate assays for characterizing hazard and risk. Other recommendations include adding endpoints for elucidating connections between mechanistic effects and adverse outcomes, identifying potentially sensitive taxa for which test methods currently do not exist, and addressing key endocrine pathways of possible concern in addition to those associated with estrogen, androgen, and thyroid signaling. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:302-316.
© 2016 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). © 2016 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endocrine disruption; High-throughput assays; Regulatory tests; Risk and hazard assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27791330      PMCID: PMC6059567          DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  64 in total

Review 1.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Oogenesis in teleosts: how eggs are formed.

Authors:  Esther Lubzens; Graham Young; Julien Bobe; Joan Cerdà
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.822

3.  Challenges and approaches to conducting and interpreting the amphibian metamorphosis assay and the fish short-term reproduction assay.

Authors:  Katherine Kemler Coady; Christine Marie Lehman; Rebecca J Currie; Troy Alan Marino
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-30

4.  17β-estradiol causes abnormal development in embryos of the viviparous eelpout.

Authors:  Jane E Morthorst; Nanna Brande-Lavridsen; Bodil Korsgaard; Poul Bjerregaard
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  The potential of AOP networks for reproductive and developmental toxicity assay development.

Authors:  Dries Knapen; Lucia Vergauwen; Daniel L Villeneuve; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Detection of endocrine disrupters: evaluation of a Fish Sexual Development Test (FSDT).

Authors:  Henrik Holbech; Karin Kinnberg; Gitte I Petersen; Petra Jackson; Ketil Hylland; Leif Norrgren; Poul Bjerregaard
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 3.228

7.  Quantitative measurement of fathead minnow vitellogenin by liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry using a signature peptide of vitellogenin.

Authors:  Fagen Zhang; Michael J Bartels; Julie C Brodeur; Kent B Woodburn
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals in fish: developing exposure indicators and predictive models of effects based on mechanism of action.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; David C Bencic; Michael S Breen; Timothy W Collette; Rory B Conolly; Nancy D Denslow; Stephen W Edwards; Drew R Ekman; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Kathleen M Jensen; James M Lazorchak; Dalma Martinović; David H Miller; Edward J Perkins; Edward F Orlando; Daniel L Villeneuve; Rong-Lin Wang; Karen H Watanabe
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Role of glucocorticoid in developmental programming: evidence from zebrafish.

Authors:  Dinushan Nesan; Mathilakath M Vijayan
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.822

Review 10.  IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a noncancer mode of action for humans.

Authors:  Alan R Boobis; John E Doe; Barbara Heinrich-Hirsch; M E Bette Meek; Sharon Munn; Mathuros Ruchirawat; Josef Schlatter; Jennifer Seed; Carolyn Vickers
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.635

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of the environmental occurrence and potential effects in aquatic vertebrates of the potent androgen receptor agonist 17β-trenbolone.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Katherine K Coady; Melanie Gross; Henrik Holbech; Steven L Levine; Gerd Maack; Mike Williams
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Toward an AOP Network-Based Tiered Testing Strategy for the Assessment of Thyroid Hormone Disruption.

Authors:  Dries Knapen; Evelyn Stinckens; Jenna E Cavallin; Gerald T Ankley; Henrik Holbech; Daniel L Villeneuve; Lucia Vergauwen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Twenty-five years after "Wingspread"- Environmental endocrine disruptors (EDCs) and human health.

Authors:  Leon Earl Gray
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-04

4.  A Multidimensional Matrix Model for Predicting the Effects of Male-Biased Sex Ratios on Fish Populations.

Authors:  David H Miller; Daniel L Villeneuve; Kelvin J Santana-Rodriguez; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.218

5.  Uncertainties in biological responses that influence hazard and risk approaches to the regulation of endocrine active substances.

Authors:  Joanne L Parrott; Poul Bjerregaard; Kristin E Brugger; L Earl Gray; Taisen Iguchi; Sarah M Kadlec; Lennart Weltje; James R Wheeler
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 6.  Application of Adverse Outcome Pathways to U.S. EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.

Authors:  Patience Browne; Pamela D Noyes; Warren M Casey; David J Dix
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Recommended approaches to the scientific evaluation of ecotoxicological hazards and risks of endocrine-active substances.

Authors:  Peter Matthiessen; Gerald T Ankley; Ronald C Biever; Poul Bjerregaard; Christopher Borgert; Kristin Brugger; Amy Blankinship; Janice Chambers; Katherine K Coady; Lisa Constantine; Zhichao Dang; Nancy D Denslow; David A Dreier; Steve Dungey; L Earl Gray; Melanie Gross; Patrick D Guiney; Markus Hecker; Henrik Holbech; Taisen Iguchi; Sarah Kadlec; Natalie K Karouna-Renier; Ioanna Katsiadaki; Yukio Kawashima; Werner Kloas; Henry Krueger; Anu Kumar; Laurent Lagadic; Annegaaike Leopold; Steven L Levine; Gerd Maack; Sue Marty; James Meador; Ellen Mihaich; Jenny Odum; Lisa Ortego; Joanne Parrott; Daniel Pickford; Mike Roberts; Christoph Schaefers; Tamar Schwarz; Keith Solomon; Tim Verslycke; Lennart Weltje; James R Wheeler; Mike Williams; Jeffrey C Wolf; Kunihiko Yamazaki
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Evaluating Chemicals for Thyroid Disruption: Opportunities and Challenges with in Vitro Testing and Adverse Outcome Pathway Approaches.

Authors:  Pamela D Noyes; Katie Paul Friedman; Patience Browne; Jonathan T Haselman; Mary E Gilbert; Michael W Hornung; Stan Barone; Kevin M Crofton; Susan C Laws; Tammy E Stoker; Steven O Simmons; Joseph E Tietge; Sigmund J Degitz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Harvesting the promise of AOPs: An assessment and recommendations.

Authors:  Annamaria Carusi; Mark R Davies; Giovanni De Grandis; Beate I Escher; Geoff Hodges; Kenneth M Y Leung; Maurice Whelan; Catherine Willett; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  The Promises and Challenges of Toxico-Epigenomics: Environmental Chemicals and Their Impacts on the Epigenome.

Authors:  Felicia Fei-Lei Chung; Zdenko Herceg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.