Literature DB >> 26066064

What Is the Early/Mid-term Survivorship and Functional Outcome After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy in a Pediatric Surgeon Practice?

George Grammatopoulos1, Jeremy Wales1, Alpesh Kothari1, Harinderjit S Gill2, Andrew Wainwright1, Tim Theologis3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a recognized joint-preserving procedure. Achieving joint stability without creating impingement is important, but the orientation target that best balances these sometimes competing goals has not yet been clearly defined. Moreover, the learning curve of this challenging procedure has not been described. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the 10-year survivorship and functional outcome after Bernese PAO in a single-surgeon series; (2) to review which patient, surgical, and radiographic factors might predict outcome after the procedure; and (3) to define the learning curve for target acetabular correction.
METHODS: The first 68 PAOs performed for symptomatic hip dysplasia were retrospectively evaluated. None have been lost to followup with followup less than 2 years. Endpoints for the lost to followup (n = 2) are at the time of when last seen. During the study period, the same surgeon performed 562 pelvic osteotomies (including Salter, Pemberton, Dega and Chiari) and 64 shelf acetabuloplasties. Bernese PAO was used only for symptomatic dysplasia (center-edge angle < 25° and nonhorizontal acetabular roof) in developmentally mature hips without evidence of major joint incongruence or subluxation. Most patients were female (n = 49 [60 hips, 88%]); mean age at operation was 25 years (SD 7). Sixteen hips had previous hip procedures. The study's mean followup was 8 years (range, 2-18 years). Patient-reported functional outcome was obtained using the WOMAC score (best-worst: 0-96). Radiographic parameters of dysplasia (acetabular index [AI], center-edge angle [CEA], congruency, Tönnis grade, and joint space) were evaluated from preoperative and postoperative radiographs using computer software.
RESULTS: The 10-year survival rate was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-100%); four patients underwent further surgery to the hip in the study period. The mean WOMAC was 12 (range, 0-54). Factors that influenced survival included joint congruency (100% versus 78%; 95% CI, 61%-96%; p = 0.03) and acetabular orientation correction achieved (AIpostoperative < 15° [100% versus 65%; 95% CI, 43-88; p < 0.001] and CEApostoperative 20° to 40° [100% versus 71.9%; 52.8-100; p < 0.001]). Better WOMAC scores were seen if postoperative AI < 15° (7 versus 25, p = 0.005) and CEA between 20° and 40° (7 versus 23, p = 0.005) were achieved. The chances of obtaining acetabular correction within this range improved after the 20(th) procedure (30% versus 70%, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: This study reports excellent results after Bernese PAO in the hands of an experienced pediatric hip surgeon. We advocate cautious correction of the acetabular fragment. Future studies should concentrate on how to determine what the optimal target is and how to achieve it intraoperatively, minimizing the learning curve associated with it. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26066064      PMCID: PMC4814429          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4386-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  Interlocking triple pelvic osteotomy in severe Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; C E Bache; J N O'Hara
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Learning curves in orthopaedic surgery: a case for super-specialisation?

Authors:  N P M Jain; A J L Jowett; N M P Clarke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Computer assisted planning and navigation of periacetabular osteotomy with range of motion optimization.

Authors:  Li Liu; Timo Ecker; Steffen Schumann; Klaus Siebenrock; Lutz Nolte; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

4.  The incidence of stress fracture following peri-acetabular osteotomy: an under-reported complication.

Authors:  A Malviya; W Dandachli; Z Beech; M J Bankes; J D Witt
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  The relationship between operative and radiographic acetabular component orientation: which factors influence resultant cup orientation?

Authors:  G Grammatopoulos; H G Pandit; R da Assunção; P McLardy-Smith; K A De Smet; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  R O Murray
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Is there a place for shelf acetabuloplasty in the management of adult acetabular dysplasia? A survivorship study.

Authors:  E Fawzy; G Mandellos; R De Steiger; P McLardy-Smith; M K D Benson; D Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-09

8.  The periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum 2 year followup in more than 100 hips.

Authors:  S J Trumble; K A Mayo; J W Mast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Bernese periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; E Schöll; M Lottenbach; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome.

Authors:  S B Murphy; R Ganz; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  [Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. : Indications, technique and results 30 years after the first description].

Authors:  T D Lerch; S D Steppacher; E F Liechti; K A Siebenrock; M Tannast
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Periacetabular osteotomy-what influence does age have on patient-relevant results? : A prospective 5‑year investigation].

Authors:  L Franken; F Thielemann; A Postler; S Blum; A Hartmann; K-P Günther; J Goronzy
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

Authors:  Daud Tai Shan Chou; Lucian Bogdan Solomon; Kerry Costi; Susan Pannach; Oksana Tamara Holubowycz; Donald William Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  One-third of Hips After Periacetabular Osteotomy Survive 30 Years With Good Clinical Results, No Progression of Arthritis, or Conversion to THA.

Authors:  Till Dominic Lerch; Simon Damian Steppacher; Emanuel Francis Liechti; Moritz Tannast; Klaus Arno Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Hip arthroscopy after periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia - incidence and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Pierre Laboudie; Thomas Dymond; Cheryl Kreviazuk; George Grammatopoulos; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Long-term results of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy using a dual approach in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Hyun Chul Shon; Woo Sung Park; Jae-Suk Chang; Seong-Eun Byun; Dong-Wook Son; Hee Jin Park; Sang Hoon Ha; Ki Tae Park; Jai Hyung Park
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The Acetabular Wall Index Is Associated with Long-term Conversion to THA after PAO.

Authors:  Vera M Stetzelberger; Christiane S Leibold; Simon D Steppacher; Joseph M Schwab; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  14-year hip survivorship after periacetabular osteotomy: a follow-up study on 1,385 hips.

Authors:  Josefine Beck Larsen; Inger Mechlenburg; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Theis Munchholm Thilleman; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Effect of coronal plane acetabular correction on joint contact pressure in Periacetabular osteotomy: a finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Kenji Kitamura; Masanori Fujii; Miho Iwamoto; Satoshi Ikemura; Satoshi Hamai; Goro Motomura; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Characteristics of the patellofemoral joint of patients with DDH and the effects of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy on the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Jianping Peng; Fei Xiao; Junfeng Zhu; Chao Shen; Yang Li; Xiuguo Han; Yimin Cui; Xiaodong Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.