Literature DB >> 25274911

The relationship between operative and radiographic acetabular component orientation: which factors influence resultant cup orientation?

G Grammatopoulos1, H G Pandit1, R da Assunção2, P McLardy-Smith1, K A De Smet3, H S Gill4, D W Murray1.   

Abstract

There is great variability in acetabular component orientation following hip replacement. The aims of this study were to compare the component orientation at impaction with the orientation measured on post-operative radiographs and identify factors that influence the difference between the two. A total of 67 hip replacements (52 total hip replacements and 15 hip resurfacings) were prospectively studied. Intra-operatively, the orientation of the acetabular component after impaction relative to the operating table was measured using a validated stereo-photogrammetry protocol. Post-operatively, the radiographic orientation was measured; the mean inclination/anteversion was 43° (sd 6°)/ 19° (sd 7°). A simulated radiographic orientation was calculated based on how the orientation would have appeared had an on-table radiograph been taken intra-operatively. The mean difference between radiographic and intra-operative inclination/anteversion was 5° (sd 5°)/ -8° (sd 8°). The mean difference between simulated radiographic and intra-operative inclination/anteversion, which quantifies the effect of the different way acetabular orientation is measured, was 3°/-6° (sd 2°). The mean difference between radiographic and simulated radiographic orientation inclination/anteversion, which is a manifestation of the change in pelvic position between component impaction and radiograph, was 1°/-2° (sd 7°). This study demonstrated that in order to achieve a specific radiographic orientation target, surgeons should implant the acetabular component 5° less inclined and 8° more anteverted than their target. Great variability (2 sd about ± 15°) in the post-operative radiographic cup orientation was seen. The two equally contributing causes for this are variability in the orientation at which the cup is implanted, and the change in pelvic position between impaction and post-operative radiograph. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Keywords:  Accuracy; Cup orientation; Hip arthroplasty; Photogrammetry; hip resurfacing; surgical recommendations

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274911     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.34100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of acetabular orientation and femoral anteversion using images of three-dimensional reconstructed bone models.

Authors:  Jaeyeong Park; Jun-Young Kim; Hyun Deok Kim; Young Cheol Kim; Anna Seo; Minkyu Je; Jong Uk Mun; Bia Kim; Il Hyung Park; Shin-Yoon Kim
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  What Is the Early/Mid-term Survivorship and Functional Outcome After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy in a Pediatric Surgeon Practice?

Authors:  George Grammatopoulos; Jeremy Wales; Alpesh Kothari; Harinderjit S Gill; Andrew Wainwright; Tim Theologis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Radiographic assessment of the cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  Jing-Xin Zhao; Xiu-Yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Ruo-Xiu Xiao; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

4.  The area method for measuring acetabular cup anteversion: An accurate and autonomous solution.

Authors:  Michael P Murphy; Cameron J Killen; Steven J Ralles; Nicholas M Brown; Albert J Song; Karen Wu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-14

5.  Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?

Authors:  Xinggui Song; Ming Ni; Heng Li; Xin Li; Xiang Li; Jun Fu; Jiying Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 6.  Can the use of an inclinometer improve acetabular cup inclination in total hip arthroplasty? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Bernard H van Duren; Joseph M Royeca; Conor M Cunningham; Jonathan N Lamb; Chris J Brew; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Orthopedic Surgeons' Accuracy When Orienting an Acetabular Cup. A Comparison with Untrained Individuals.

Authors:  Jesús Moreta; Óscar Gayoso; Daniel Donaire-Hoyas; Jorge Roces-García; Jesús Gómez-Vallejo; Esther Moya-Gómez; David Raya-Roldán; Alberto Albert-Ullibarri; Fernando Marqués-López; Jorge Albareda
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 8.  Cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty: how to get it right without navigation or robotics.

Authors:  Geert Meermans; George Grammatopoulos; Moritz Innmann; David Beverland
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-31

9.  Visual intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position is not reliable in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Woerner; Ernst Sendtner; Robert Springorum; Benjamin Craiovan; Michael Worlicek; Tobias Renkawitz; Joachim Grifka; Markus Weber
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.