Literature DB >> 10379305

The periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum 2 year followup in more than 100 hips.

S J Trumble1, K A Mayo, J W Mast.   

Abstract

The results of 123 periacetabular osteotomies in 115 patients were reviewed at an average clinical followup of 4.3 years. The average age of the patients at the time of the operation was 32.9 years. The preoperative diagnosis was congenital dysplasia in 101 hips, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease in 10 hips, Charcot Marie Tooth disease in four hips, epiphyseal dysplasia in three hips, congenital coxa vara in two hips, slipped capital femoral epiphysis in one hip, and posttraumatic and postinfectious dysplasia in one hip each. The ilioinguinal approach was used in 67 hips and the modified Smith-Petersen approach was used in 56 hips. A periacetabular osteotomy was combined with an intertrochanteric osteotomy and/or trochanteric transfer in 32 hips. Ten hips underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an acetabular rim fracture and 18 arthrotomies were performed at the time of periacetabular osteotomy. The average Harris hip score increased from 65 points preoperatively to 89 points at latest followup. The average Merle d'Aubigne score increased from 13.6 points preoperatively to 16.3 points at latest followup. Overall, 83% of the hips were rated clinically as good to excellent. Seven hips have undergone total hip arthroplasty and six subsequent intertrochanteric osteotomies were performed. The majority of the major complications occurred when the osteotomy was performed through the ilioinguinal approach. The latest followup radiographic severity of osteoarthrosis, according to the criteria of Tönnis, improved or was unchanged in 117 hips (95%), and progressed in only six hips (5%). The majority of the hips with preoperative changes in the periarticular bone showed some evidence of regeneration, which was shown by a decrease in the subchondral sclerosis, disappearance of cysts, or healing of an acetabular rim fracture. The short term results of the periacetabular osteotomy are encouraging from the standpoint of improvements in clinical scores and in the appearance of the joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10379305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  53 in total

1.  The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for treatment of adult hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Todd O McKinley
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Prospective bone density changes after periacetabular osteotomy: a methodological study.

Authors:  I Mechlenburg; J R Nyengaard; L Rømer; K Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Patient Age and Hip Morphology Alter Joint Mechanics in Computational Models of Patients With Hip Dysplasia.

Authors:  Holly D Thomas-Aitken; Jessica E Goetz; Kevin N Dibbern; Robert W Westermann; Michael C Willey; Timothy S Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reliable angle assessment during periacetabular osteotomy with a novel device.

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Brian Elmengaard; Lone Rømer; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; Amanda L Schutz; Lauren St John; Perry L Schoenecker; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Complications after hip osteotomy].

Authors:  L Renner; C Perka; R Zahn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  What Is the Early/Mid-term Survivorship and Functional Outcome After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy in a Pediatric Surgeon Practice?

Authors:  George Grammatopoulos; Jeremy Wales; Alpesh Kothari; Harinderjit S Gill; Andrew Wainwright; Tim Theologis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Does previous pelvic osteotomy compromise the results of periacetabular osteotomy surgery?

Authors:  Jeffrey B Stambough; John C Clohisy; Geneva R Baca; Ira Zaltz; Robert Trousdale; Michael Millis; Daniel Sucato; Young-Jo Kim; Ernest Sink; Perry L Schoenecker; Rafael Sierra; David Podeszwa; Paul Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Complications and patient satisfaction after periacetabular pelvic osteotomy.

Authors:  R Biedermann; L Donnan; A Gabriel; R Wachter; M Krismer; H Behensky
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [Delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): molecular MRI of hip joint cartilage].

Authors:  C Zilkens; M Jäger; B Bittersohl; M Dudda; M B Millis; Y-J Kim; G Muhr; R Krauspe; T C Mamisch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.