Literature DB >> 10379300

Bernese periacetabular osteotomy.

K A Siebenrock1, E Schöll, M Lottenbach, R Ganz.   

Abstract

Seventy-five symptomatic dysplastic hip joints (63 patients) were treated with the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy during a period of 44 months. The mean patients' age was 29 years (range, 13-56 years) and the female:male ratio was 3.4:1. Group III dysplasia according to Severin was seen in 50% and Group IV dysplasia was seen in 44% of the patients. Osteoarthritis was present in 58% of the patients. Followup was obtained at a mean of 11.3 years (range, 10-13.8 years) in 71 hip joints (95%). Radiographic measurements of the lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, acetabular index, lateralization of the femoral head, and intactness of Shenton's line showed a high correction potential of this type of osteotomy. In 58 patients (82%) the hip joint was preserved at last followup with a good to excellent result in 73%. Unfavorable outcome was significantly associated with higher age of the patient, moderate to severe osteoarthritis at surgery, a labral lesion, less anterior coverage correction, and a suboptimal acetabular index. Major complications were encountered in the first 18 patients including an intraarticular cut in two, excessive lateralization in one, secondary loss of correction in two and femoral head subluxation in three patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10379300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  104 in total

1.  Report of breakout session: Intraarticular work during periacetabular osteotomy--simultaneous arthrotomy or hip arthroscopy?

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Report of breakout session: Defining parameters for correcting the acetabulum during a pelvic reorientation osteotomy.

Authors:  Michael B Millis; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for treatment of adult hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Todd O McKinley
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Is the obturator artery safe when performing ischial osteotomy during periacetabular osteotomy?

Authors:  Satoshi Kamada; Masatoshi Naito; Kei Shiramizu; Yoshinari Nakamura; Koichi Kinoshita
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Outcome of peri-acetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia in teenagers.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sakamoto; Masatoshi Naito; Yoshinari Nakamura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Outcome of periacetabular osteotomy: joint contact pressure calculation using standing AP radiographs, 12 patients followed for average 2 years.

Authors:  Mehran Armand; Jyri Lepistö; Kaj Tallroth; John Elias; Edmund Chao
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Mid-term results of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of hip in middle aged patients.

Authors:  Junfeng Zhu; Xiaodong Chen; Yiming Cui; Chao Shen; Guiquan Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Complications and patient satisfaction after periacetabular pelvic osteotomy.

Authors:  R Biedermann; L Donnan; A Gabriel; R Wachter; M Krismer; H Behensky
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Joint preserving surgery of the adult hip: pelvic osteotomies].

Authors:  L Büchler; M Beck; H Gollwitzer; B D Katthagen; A R Zahedi
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Is intraarticular pathology common in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing periacetabular osteotomy?

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; Justin M Lareau; Hasan Baydoun; Itamar Botser; Michael B Millis; Yi-Meng Yen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.