| Literature DB >> 26064936 |
Arash Khorasani Esmaeili1, Rosna Mat Taha1, Sadegh Mohajer1, Behrooz Banisalam1.
Abstract
In the present study the extracts of in vivo and in vitro grown plants as well as callus tissue of red clover were tested for their antioxidant activities, using different extraction solvent and different antioxidant assays. The total flavonoid and phenolic contents as well as extraction yield of the extracts were also investigated to determine their correlation with the antioxidant activity of the extracts. Among all the tested extracts the highest amounts of total phenolic and total flavonoids content were found in methanol extract of in vivo grown plants. The antioxidant activity of tested samples followed the order in vivo plant extract > callus extract > in vitro extract. The highest reducing power, 2,2-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging, and chelating power were found in methanol extracts of in vivo grown red clover, while the chloroform fraction of in vivo grown plants showed the highest 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, superoxide anion radical scavenging and hydrogen peroxide scavenging compared to the other tested extracts. A significant correlation was found between the antioxidant activity of extracts and their total phenolic and total flavonoid content. According to the findings, the extract of in vitro culture of red clover especially the callus tissue possesses a comparable antioxidant activity to the in vivo cultured plants' extract.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26064936 PMCID: PMC4438149 DOI: 10.1155/2015/643285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Total phenolic, total flavonoid, and extraction yield of methanol extract and soluble fractions of in vivo and in vitro grown plants (aerial parts) and also callus tissue of Trifolium pretense.
| Plant extract | Total phenolic | Total flavonoid | Extraction yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Methanol extract | 46.88 ± 1.07a | 26.61 ± 0.92a | 13.89 ± 0.54a |
| n-Hexane fraction | 30.52 ± 0.72cd | 16.06 ± 1.58d | 10.79 ± 0.59c |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 27.57 ± 0.49e | 11.71 ± 1.43fg | 6.39 ± 1.12e |
| Chloroform fraction | 40.17 ± 0.88b | 19.56 ± 1.11b | 12.23 ± 0.54b |
|
| |||
| Methanol extract | 31.94 ± 1.68c | 13.03 ± 0.79ef | 10.84 ± 0.72c |
| n-Hexane fraction | 20.06 ± 0.41g | 8.23 ± 0.96h | 5.20 ± 0.54f |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 16.90 ± 1.19h | 6.11 ± 0.79i | 2.35 ± 0.5g |
| Chloroform fraction | 25.43 ± 0.87f | 10.39 ± 0.79g | 7.18 ± 0.82e |
| Callus | |||
| Methanol extract | 40.82 ± 1.5b | 17.84 ± 0.53c | 11.36 ± 0.55bc |
| n-Hexane fraction | 31.77 ± 1.14c | 12.70 ± 0.94ef | 6.13 ± 0.34ef |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 19.23 ± 0.66g | 7.21 ± 0.74hi | 2.98 ± 0.66g |
| Chloroform fraction | 29.25 ± 1.62de | 14.02 ± 1.08e | 8.70 ± 0.52d |
Each value is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Means in the same column not sharing the same letters are significantly different at (Duncan) P < 0.05.
Figure 1DPPH radical scavenging activity of different extracts from the methanol extract of Trifolium pratense by different solvent at different concentration. (a) In vivo grown plants, (b) in vitro grown plants, and (c) callus tissue. Each value is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
DPPH radical scavenging activity of methanol extract and soluble fractions of in vivo and in vitro grown plants and callus tissue of red clover (Trifolium pratense).
| Plant extract | EC50 of DPPH radical scavenging activity ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Callus | |
| Methanol extract | 94.25 ± 1.15c∗ | 205.47 ± 2.90b∗∗∗ | 128.42 ± 2.40 |
| n-Hexane fraction | 131.42 ± 3.20d∗∗ | 291.95 ± 2.98c∗∗∗ | 120.74 ± 3.45b∗ |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | >300e∗ | ≫300d∗∗∗ | >300e∗∗ |
| Chloroform fraction | 81.04 ± 2.33b∗ | 208.86 ± 2.20b∗∗∗ | 155.17 ± 2.80d∗∗ |
| Ascorbic acid | 21.17 ± 0.76a | 21.17 ± 0.76a | 21.17 ± 0.76a |
Each value in the table is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Means not sharing the same symbols (∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗) are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same row.
Means not sharing the same letters are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same column.
Figure 2Superoxide radical scavenging activity of different extracts from the methanol extract of Trifolium pratense by different solvent at different concentration. (a) In vivo grown plants, (b) in vitro grown plants, and (c) callus tissue. Each value is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Superoxide anion activity of methanol extract and soluble fractions of in vivo and in vitro grown plants and callus tissue of red clover (Trifolium pratense).
| Plant extract | EC50 of superoxide anion activity ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Callus | |
| Methanol extract | 74.68 ± 1.59c∗ | 179.77 ± 1.60c∗∗ | 74.36 ± 1.42b∗ |
| n-Hexane fraction | 139.83 ± 2.40d∗ | 246.59 ± 2.09d∗∗∗ | 190.06 ± 2.56d∗∗ |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 201.55 ± 1.94e∗ | 260.01 ± 1.46e∗∗∗ | 228.41 ± 1.52e∗∗ |
| Chloroform fraction | 70.69 ± 1.76b∗ | 155.91 ± 1.73b∗∗∗ | 104.32 ± 1.45c∗∗ |
| Ascorbic acid | 23.44 ± 0.84a | 23.44 ± 0.84a | 23.44 ± 0.84a |
Each value in the table is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Means not sharing the same symbols (∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗) are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same row.
Means not sharing the same letters are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same column.
ABTS radical scavenging of methanol extract and soluble fractions of in vivo and in vitro grown plants and callus tissue of red clover (Trifolium pratense).
| Plant extract | EC50 of ABTS ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Callus | |
| Methanol extract | 111.84 ± 1.46b∗ | 351.46 ± 2.02c∗∗∗ | 164.32 ± 1.61b∗∗ |
| n-Hexane fraction | 210.76 ± 1.71d∗ | >500d∗∗∗ | 225.63 ± 2.05d∗∗ |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | >500e∗ | ≫500e∗∗∗ | >500e∗∗ |
| Chloroform fraction | 122.34 ± 2.29c∗ | 297.68 ± 1.68b∗∗∗ | 172.18 ± 1.55c∗∗ |
| Ascorbic acid | 34.67 ± 0.53a | 34.67 ± 0.53a | 34.67 ± 0.53a |
Each value in the table is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Means not sharing the same symbols (∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗) are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same row.
Means not sharing the same letters are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same column.
Hydrogen peroxide scavenging of methanol extract and soluble fractions of in vivo and in vitro grown plants and callus tissue of red clover (Trifolium pratense).
| Plant extract | EC50 of hydrogen peroxide ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Callus | |
| Methanol extract | 103.44 ± 1.47c∗ | 219.86 ± 1.57b∗∗∗ | 141.74 ± 1.93c∗∗ |
| n-Hexane fraction | 270.56 ± 1.72e∗ | ≫300e∗∗∗ | 287.63 ± 1.59e∗∗ |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 138.16 ± 1.93d∗∗ | >300d∗∗∗ | 132.26 ± 2.03b∗ |
| Chloroform fraction | 88.35 ± 1.27b∗ | 231.49 ± 2.02c∗∗∗ | 146.31 ± 1.67d∗∗ |
| Ascorbic acid | 26.84 ± 0.83a | 26.84 ± 0.83a | 26.84 ± 0.83a |
Each value in the table is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Means not sharing the same symbols (∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗) are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same row.
Means not sharing the same letters are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same column.
Chelating activity of methanol extract and soluble fractions of in vivo and in vitro grown plants and callus tissue of red clover (Trifolium pratense).
| Plant extract | EC50 of chelating power ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Callus | |
| Methanol extract | 49.11 ± 0.97b∗ | 142.87 ± 1.71c∗∗∗ | 72.56 ± 1.16d∗∗ |
| n-Hexane fraction | 52.33 ± 1.97c∗ | 131.84 ± 2.05b∗∗∗ | 67.52 ± 2.15c∗∗ |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 105.67 ± 1.56e∗ | 183.44 ± 2.48e∗∗∗ | 118.23 ± 2.02e∗∗ |
| Chloroform fraction | 86.32 ± 1.89d∗∗ | 161.75 ± 1.36d∗∗∗ | 60.17 ± 1.42b∗ |
| Catechin | 22.76 ± 0.37a | 22.76 ± 0.37a | 22.76 ± 0.37a |
Each value in the table is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Means not sharing the same symbols (∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗) are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same row.
Means not sharing the same letters are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same column.
Reducing power of methanol extract and soluble fraction (300 μg/mL) of in vivo and in vitro grown plants and callus tissue of red clover (Trifolium pratense).
| Plant extract | Reducing power absorbance at 700 nm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Callus | |
| Methanol extract | 1.05 ± 0.07b∗ | 0.72 ± 0.03b∗∗∗ | 0.82 ± 0.03c∗∗ |
| n-Hexane fraction | 0.88 ± 0.04c∗ | 0.52 ± 0.04c∗∗∗ | 0.65 ± 0.02d∗∗ |
| Ethyl acetate fraction | 0.59 ± 0.03d∗ | 0.38 ± 0.01d∗∗∗ | 0.52 ± 0.03e∗∗ |
| Chloroform fraction | 0.95 ± 0.03c∗ | 0.71 ± 0.04b∗∗ | 0.91 ± 0.03b∗ |
| Ascorbic acid | 2.45 ± 0.03a | 2.45 ± 0.03a | 2.45 ± 0.03a |
Each value in the table is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Means not sharing the same symbols (∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗) are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same row.
Means not sharing the same letters are significantly different (Duncan) at P < 0.05 in the same column.
Correlation between the antioxidant activity and total phenolic and flavonoid of the extract of in vivo grown Trifolium pretense.
| Assays | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Total flavonoid | Total phenolic | |
| DPPH radical scavenging activity | 0.759∗∗ | 0.745∗∗ |
| Superoxide radical scavenging activity | 0.856∗∗ | 0.903∗∗ |
| ABTS radical scavenging ability | 0.814∗∗ | 0.801∗∗ |
| Hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging activity | 0.414 | 0.598∗ |
| Chelating power | 0.670∗ | 0.500 |
| Reducing power | 0.884∗∗ | 0.861∗∗ |
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation between the antioxidant activity and total phenolic and flavonoid of the extract of in vitro grown Trifolium pretense.
| Assays | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Total flavonoid | Total phenolic | |
| DPPH radical scavenging activity | 0.893∗∗ | 0.876∗∗ |
| Superoxide radical scavenging activity | 0.793∗∗ | 0.806∗∗ |
| ABTS radical scavenging ability | 0.825∗∗ | 0.827∗∗ |
| Hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging activity | 0.784∗∗ | 0.833∗∗ |
| Chelating power | 0.502 | 0.441 |
| Reducing power | 0.862∗∗ | 0.862∗∗ |
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlation between the antioxidant activity and total phenolic and flavonoid of the extract of callus tissue of Trifolium pretense.
| Assays | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Total flavonoid | Total phenolic | |
| DPPH radical scavenging activity | 0.849∗∗ | 0.822∗∗ |
| Superoxide radical scavenging activity | 0.912∗∗ | 0.917∗∗ |
| ABTS radical scavenging ability | 0.903∗∗ | 0.876∗∗ |
| Hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging activity | 0.023 | 0.020 |
| Chelating power | 0.775∗∗ | 0.734∗∗ |
| Reducing power | 0.777∗∗ | 0.753∗∗ |
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).