Literature DB >> 26063896

International Expert Consensus on Primary Systemic Therapy in the Management of Early Breast Cancer: Highlights of the Fifth Symposium on Primary Systemic Therapy in the Management of Operable Breast Cancer, Cremona, Italy (2013).

Vito Amoroso1, Daniele Generali1, Thomas Buchholz1, Massimo Cristofanilli1, Rebecca Pedersini1, Giuseppe Curigliano1, Maria Grazia Daidone1, Serena Di Cosimo1, Mitchell Dowsett1, Stephen Fox1, Adrian L Harris1, Andreas Makris1, Lucia Vassalli1, Andrea Ravelli1, Maria Rosa Cappelletti1, Christos Hatzis1, Clifford A Hudis1, Paolo Pedrazzoli1, Anna Sapino1, Vladimir Semiglazov1, Gunter Von Minckwitz1, Edda L Simoncini1, Michael A Jacobs1, Peter Barry1, Thorsten Kühn1, Sarah Darby1, Kerstin Hermelink1, Fraser Symmans1, Alessandra Gennari1, Gaia Schiavon1, Luigi Dogliotti1, Alfredo Berruti1, Alberto Bottini1.   

Abstract

Expert consensus-based recommendations regarding key issues in the use of primary (or neoadjuvant) systemic treatment (PST) in patients with early breast cancer are a valuable resource for practising oncologists. PST remains a valuable therapeutic approach for the assessment of biological antitumor activity and clinical efficacy of new treatments in clinical trials. Neoadjuvant trials provide endpoints, such as pathological complete response (pCR) to treatment, that potentially translate into meaningful improvements in overall survival and disease-free survival. Neoadjuvant trials need fewer patients and are less expensive than adjuvant trial, and the endpoint of pCR is achieved in months, rather than years. For these reasons, the neoadjuvant setting is ideal for testing emerging targeted therapies in early breast cancer. Although pCR is an early clinical endpoint, its role as a surrogate for long-term outcomes is the key issue. New and better predictors of treatment efficacy are needed to improve treatment and outcomes. After PST, accurate management of post-treatment residual disease is mandatory. The surgery of the sentinel lymph-node could be an acceptable option to spare the axillary dissection in case of clinical negativity (N0) of the axilla at the diagnosis and/or after PST. No data exists yet to support the modulation of the extent of locoregional radiation therapy on the basis of the response attained after PST although trials are underway.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26063896      PMCID: PMC5009414          DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgv023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  43 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant therapy with paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and concurrent trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer: an update of the initial randomized study population and data of additional patients treated with the same regimen.

Authors:  Aman U Buzdar; Vicente Valero; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Deborah Francis; Kristine R Broglio; Richard L Theriault; Lajos Pusztai; Marjorie C Green; Sonja E Singletary; Kelly K Hunt; Aysegul A Sahin; Francisco Esteva; William F Symmans; Michael S Ewer; Thomas A Buchholz; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Pathologic complete response as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-regression of 29 randomized prospective studies.

Authors:  Alfredo Berruti; Vito Amoroso; Fabio Gallo; Valentina Bertaglia; Edda Simoncini; Rebecca Pedersini; Laura Ferrari; Alberto Bottini; Paolo Bruzzi; Maria Pia Sormani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sibylle Loibl; Christoph Salat; Carsten Denkert; Mahdi Rezai; Jens U Blohmer; Christian Jackisch; Stefan Paepke; Bernd Gerber; Dirk M Zahm; Sherko Kümmel; Holger Eidtmann; Peter Klare; Jens Huober; Serban Costa; Hans Tesch; Claus Hanusch; Jörn Hilfrich; Fariba Khandan; Peter A Fasching; Bruno V Sinn; Knut Engels; Keyur Mehta; Valentina Nekljudova; Michael Untch
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Vera J Suman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Henry M Kuerer; Monet Bowling; Teresa S Flippo-Morton; David R Byrd; David W Ollila; Thomas B Julian; Sarah A McLaughlin; Linda McCall; W Fraser Symmans; Huong T Le-Petross; Bruce G Haffty; Thomas A Buchholz; Heidi Nelson; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Ki67 measured after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Sibylle Loibl; Berit M Müller; Jens U Blohmer; Bruno V Sinn; Holger Eidtmann; Wolfgang Eiermann; Bernd Gerber; Hans Tesch; Jörn Hilfrich; Jens Huober; Tanja Fehm; Jana Barinoff; Thomas Rüdiger; Erhard Erbstoesser; Peter A Fasching; Thomas Karn; Volkmar Müller; Christian Jackisch; Carsten Denkert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Molecular subtyping of early-stage breast cancer identifies a group of patients who do not benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Stefan Glück; Femke de Snoo; Justine Peeters; Lisette Stork-Sloots; George Somlo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Locoregional radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer responding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a paradigm for treatment individualization.

Authors:  Julia White; Eleftherios Mamounas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and targeted therapy in breast cancer: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Simon P Gampenrieder; Gabriel Rinnerthaler; Richard Greil
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Pathological non-response to chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting of breast cancer: an inter-institutional study.

Authors:  D Balmativola; C Marchiò; M Maule; L Chiusa; L Annaratone; F Maletta; F Montemurro; J Kulka; P Figueiredo; Z Varga; I Liepniece-Karele; G Cserni; E Arkoumani; I Amendoeira; G Callagy; A Reiner-Concin; A Cordoba; S Bianchi; T Decker; D Gläser; C Focke; P van Diest; D Grabau; E Lips; J Wesseling; R Arisio; E Medico; C Wells; A Sapino
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  10 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy through intense inhibition of the androgen target: "Midsummer Night's Dream" or "Much Ado About Nothing"?

Authors:  Alessandro Antonelli; Carlotta Palumbo; Alfredo Berruti
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  Patterns of Local-Regional Management Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance).

Authors:  Bruce G Haffty; Linda M McCall; Karla V Ballman; Sarah McLaughlin; Reshma Jagsi; David W Ollila; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Impact of Radiation on Locoregional Control in Women with Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: Results from ACOSOG Z1071 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Bruce G Haffty; Linda M McCall; Karla V Ballman; Thomas A Buchholz; Kelly K Hunt; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A Phase II Randomized Study of Neoadjuvant Letrozole Plus Alpelisib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer (NEO-ORB).

Authors:  Ingrid A Mayer; Aleix Prat; Daniel Egle; Sibel Blau; J Alejandro Pérez Fidalgo; Michael Gnant; Peter A Fasching; Marco Colleoni; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer; Christian F Singer; Sara Hurvitz; Laura García Estévez; Peter A van Dam; Sherko Kümmel; Christoph Mundhenke; Frankie Holmes; Naveen Babbar; Laure Charbonnier; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Florian D Vogl; Dalila Sellami; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Does Residual Cancer Burden Predict Local Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Authors:  Christine V Pestana; Chad A Livasy; Erin E Donahue; Brittany Neelands; Antoinette R Tan; Terry Sarantou; Lejla Hadzikadic-Gusic; Richard L White
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 6.  Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Zong; Jiayi Wu; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-07

7.  Prognostic value of routine laboratory variables in prediction of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Zhu Zhu; Ling Li; Zhong Ye; Tong Fu; Ye Du; Aiping Shi; Di Wu; Ke Li; Yifan Zhu; Chun Wang; Zhimin Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for Detecting Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparison with Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Filipe Ramos Barra; Alaor Barra Sobrinho; Renato Ramos Barra; Mayra Teixeira Magalhães; Laira Rodrigues Aguiar; Gabriela Feitosa Lins de Albuquerque; Rodrigo Pepe Costa; Luciano Farage; Riccardo Pratesi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Circulating non‑coding RNA‑biomarker potential in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of triple negative breast cancer?

Authors:  Andrea Ritter; Marc Hirschfeld; Kai Berner; Gerta Rücker; Markus Jäger; Daniela Weiss; Markus Medl; Claudia Nöthling; Sandra Gassner; Jasmin Asberger; Thalia Erbes
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 10.  Treatment and patient related quality of life issues in elderly and very elderly breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Bengü Depboylu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.