Literature DB >> 26063773

Prediction strength modulates responses in human area CA1 to sequence violations.

Janice Chen1, Paul A Cook2, Anthony D Wagner3.   

Abstract

Emerging human, animal, and computational evidence suggest that, within the hippocampus, stored memories are compared with current sensory input to compute novelty, i.e., detecting when inputs deviate from expectations. Hippocampal subfield CA1 is thought to detect mismatches between past and present, and detected novelty is thought to modulate encoding processes, providing a mechanism for gating the entry of information into memory. Using high-resolution functional MRI, we examined human hippocampal subfield and medial temporal lobe cortical activation during prediction violations within a sequence of events unfolding over time. Subjects encountered sequences of four visual stimuli that were then reencountered in the same temporal order (Repeat) or a rearranged order (Violation). Prediction strength was manipulated by varying whether the sequence was initially presented once (Weak) or thrice (Strong) prior to the critical Repeat or Violation sequence. Analyses of blood oxygen level-dependent signals revealed that task-responsive voxels in anatomically defined CA1, CA23/dentate gyrus, and perirhinal cortex were more active when expectations were violated than when confirmed. Additionally, stronger prediction violations elicited greater activity than weaker violations in CA1, and CA1 contained the greatest proportion of voxels displaying this prediction violation pattern relative to other medial temporal lobe regions. Finally, a memory test with a separate group of subjects showed that subsequent recognition memory was superior for items that had appeared in prediction violation trials than in prediction confirmation trials. These findings indicate that CA1 responds to temporal order prediction violations, and that this response is modulated by prediction strength.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  associative novelty; comparator; declarative memory; fMRI; mismatch detection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26063773      PMCID: PMC4725111          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00149.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

Review 1.  Hippocampus as comparator: role of the two input and two output systems of the hippocampus in selection and registration of information.

Authors:  O S Vinogradova
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Distinct pattern separation related transfer functions in human CA3/dentate and CA1 revealed using high-resolution fMRI and variable mnemonic similarity.

Authors:  Joyce W Lacy; Michael A Yassa; Shauna M Stark; L Tugan Muftuler; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes.

Authors:  Andrew Mayes; Daniela Montaldi; Ellen Migo
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Which computational mechanisms operate in the hippocampus during novelty detection?

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Associative retrieval processes in the human medial temporal lobe: hippocampal retrieval success and CA1 mismatch detection.

Authors:  Janice Chen; Rosanna K Olsen; Alison R Preston; Gary H Glover; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  High-resolution fMRI reveals match enhancement and attentional modulation in the human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Nicole M Dudukovic; Alison R Preston; Jermaine J Archie; Gary H Glover; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Intracranial EEG correlates of expectancy and memory formation in the human hippocampus and nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Nikolai Axmacher; Michael X Cohen; Juergen Fell; Sven Haupt; Matthias Dümpelmann; Christian E Elger; Thomas E Schlaepfer; Doris Lenartz; Volker Sturm; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Performance-related sustained and anticipatory activity in human medial temporal lobe during delayed match-to-sample.

Authors:  Rosanna K Olsen; Elizabeth A Nichols; Janice Chen; Jack F Hunt; Gary H Glover; John D E Gabrieli; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Match mismatch processes underlie human hippocampal responses to associative novelty.

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  High-resolution fMRI of content-sensitive subsequent memory responses in human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Alison R Preston; Aaron M Bornstein; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Meghan E Gaare; Gary H Glover; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  16 in total

1.  Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, and Hippocampus Differentially Represent the Event Saliency.

Authors:  Anna Jafarpour; Sandon Griffin; Jack J Lin; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Transcending time in the brain: How event memories are constructed from experience.

Authors:  David Clewett; Sarah DuBrow; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Hippocampal Mismatch Signals Are Modulated by the Strength of Neural Predictions and Their Similarity to Outcomes.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; Hongmi Lee; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural Signatures of Learning Novel Object-Scene Associations.

Authors:  Cybelle M Smith; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Associative Prediction of Visual Shape in the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Mnemonic prediction errors promote detailed memories.

Authors:  Oded Bein; Natalie A Plotkin; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  A neural network model of when to retrieve and encode episodic memories.

Authors:  Qihong Lu; Uri Hasson; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Prediction errors disrupt hippocampal representations and update episodic memories.

Authors:  Alyssa H Sinclair; Grace M Manalili; Iva K Brunec; R Alison Adcock; Morgan D Barense
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Understanding Everyday Events: Predictive-Looking Errors Drive Memory Updating.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Michelle L Eisenberg; David Stawarczyk; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-04-19

10.  CA1 and CA3 differentially support spontaneous retrieval of episodic contexts within human hippocampal subfields.

Authors:  Halle R Dimsdale-Zucker; Maureen Ritchey; Arne D Ekstrom; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.