Literature DB >> 17687029

Match mismatch processes underlie human hippocampal responses to associative novelty.

Dharshan Kumaran1, Eleanor A Maguire.   

Abstract

The hippocampus has long been proposed to play a critical role in novelty detection through its ability to act as a comparator between past and present experience. A recent study provided evidence for this hypothesis by characterizing hippocampal responses to sequence novelty, a type of associative novelty where familiar items appear in a new temporal order. Here, we ask whether a hippocampal match-mismatch (i.e., comparator) mechanism operates selectively to identify the violation of predictions within the temporal domain or instead also underlies the processing of associative novelty in other domains (e.g., spatial). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a repetition paradigm in which subjects viewed sequences of objects presented in distinct locations on the screen and performed an incidental target detection task. The left hippocampus exhibited a pattern of activity consistent with that of an associative match-mismatch detector, with novelty signals generated only in conditions where one contextual component was novel and the other repeated. In contrast, right hippocampal activation signaled the presence of objects in familiar locations. Our results suggest that hippocampal match-mismatch computations constitute a general mechanism underpinning the processing of associative novelty. These findings support a model in which hippocampal mismatch signals rely critically on the recall of previous experience, a process that only occurs when novel sensory inputs overlap significantly with stored representations. More generally, the current study also offers insights into how the hippocampus automatically represents the spatiotemporal context of our experiences, a function that may relate to its role in episodic memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17687029      PMCID: PMC2572808          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1677-07.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  53 in total

Review 1.  Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?

Authors:  M W Brown; J P Aggleton
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Medial temporal lobe activations in fMRI and PET studies of episodic encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  D L Schacter; A D Wagner
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Prefrontal-temporal circuitry for episodic encoding and subsequent memory.

Authors:  B A Kirchhoff; A D Wagner; A Maril; C E Stern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Material-specific lateralization in the medial temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex during memory encoding.

Authors:  A J Golby; R A Poldrack; J B Brewer; D Spencer; J E Desmond; A P Aron; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  Neuroimaging studies of autobiographical event memory.

Authors:  E A Maguire
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector; R Malach
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-04

7.  Differential spatial memory impairment after right temporal lobectomy demonstrated using temporal titration.

Authors:  J A Nunn; F J Graydon; C E Polkey; R G Morris
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory.

Authors:  J D Ryan; R R Althoff; S Whitlow; N J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-11

9.  Similarity, global matching, and judgments of frequency.

Authors:  D L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-06

10.  Unilateral temporal lobectomy patients show lateralized topographical and episodic memory deficits in a virtual town.

Authors:  H J Spiers; N Burgess; E A Maguire; S A Baxendale; T Hartley; P J Thompson; J O'Keefe
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  98 in total

1.  A model of hippocampal competition between new learning and memory updating.

Authors:  Antoine Besnard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Hippocampus Guides Adaptive Learning during Dynamic Social Interactions.

Authors:  Oriel FeldmanHall; David F Montez; Elizabeth A Phelps; Lila Davachi; Vishnu P Murty
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Medial temporal lobe activity predicts successful relational memory binding.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Greater working memory load results in greater medial temporal activity at retrieval.

Authors:  Karin Schon; Yakeel T Quiroz; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Recollection versus strength as the primary determinant of hippocampal engagement at retrieval.

Authors:  Melanie Cohn; Morris Moscovitch; Ayelet Lahat; Mary Pat McAndrews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Biasing the organism for novelty: A pervasive property of the attention system.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Luis J Fuentes; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Evaluating the differential roles of the dorsal dentate gyrus, dorsal CA3, and dorsal CA1 during a temporal ordering for spatial locations task.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Pattern Separation Underpins Expectation-Modulated Memory.

Authors:  Darya Frank; Marcelo A Montemurro; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Exploring the detection of associatively novel events using fMRI.

Authors:  Andreja Bubic; D Yves von Cramon; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Adaptation to cognitive context and item information in the medial temporal lobes.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.