Literature DB >> 35439426

Understanding Everyday Events: Predictive-Looking Errors Drive Memory Updating.

Christopher N Wahlheim1, Michelle L Eisenberg2, David Stawarczyk2,3, Jeffrey M Zacks2.   

Abstract

Memory-guided predictions can improve event comprehension by guiding attention and the eyes to the location where an actor is about to perform an action. But when events change, viewers may experience predictive-looking errors and need to update their memories. In two experiments (Ns = 38 and 98), we examined the consequences of mnemonic predictive-looking errors for comprehending and remembering event changes. University students watched movies of everyday activities with actions that were repeated exactly and actions that were repeated with changed features-for example, an actor reached for a paper towel on one occasion and a dish towel on the next. Memory guidance led to predictive-looking errors that were associated with better memory for subsequently changed event features. These results indicate that retrieving recent event features can guide predictions during unfolding events and that error signals derived from mismatches between mnemonic predictions and actual events contribute to new learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action observation; event cognition; memory updating; mnemonic prediction error; open data; open materials; predictive looking

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35439426      PMCID: PMC9248286          DOI: 10.1177/09567976211053596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  33 in total

1.  From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball.

Authors:  M F Land; P McLeod
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Anurag Shrivastava; Ryan Mruczek; Jeff B Pelz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Action plans used in action observation.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Cognitive development. Observing the unexpected enhances infants' learning and exploration.

Authors:  Aimee E Stahl; Lisa Feigenson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Prediction strength modulates responses in human area CA1 to sequence violations.

Authors:  Janice Chen; Paul A Cook; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Saccades to future ball location reveal memory-based prediction in a virtual-reality interception task.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Constantin Rothkopf; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Infants predict other people's action goals.

Authors:  Terje Falck-Ytter; Gustaf Gredebäck; Claes von Hofsten
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Action production influences 12-month-old infants' attention to others' actions.

Authors:  Erin N Cannon; Amanda L Woodward; Gustaf Gredebäck; Claes von Hofsten; Colleen Turek
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-09-29

9.  Action Prediction Allows Hypothesis Testing via Internal Forward Models at 6 Months of Age.

Authors:  Gustaf Gredebäck; Marcus Lindskog; Joshua C Juvrud; Dorota Green; Carin Marciszko
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-12

10.  Expectation affects learning and modulates memory experience at retrieval.

Authors:  Alex Kafkas; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.