Literature DB >> 27821577

Hippocampal Mismatch Signals Are Modulated by the Strength of Neural Predictions and Their Similarity to Outcomes.

Nicole M Long1, Hongmi Lee2, Brice A Kuhl1.   

Abstract

The hippocampus is thought to compare predicted events with current perceptual input, generating a mismatch signal when predictions are violated. However, most prior studies have only inferred when predictions occur without measuring them directly. Moreover, an important but unresolved question is whether hippocampal mismatch signals are modulated by the degree to which predictions differ from outcomes. Here, we conducted a human fMRI study in which subjects repeatedly studied various word-picture pairs, learning to predict particular pictures (outcomes) from the words (cues). After initial learning, a subset of cues was paired with a novel, unexpected outcome, whereas other cues continued to predict the same outcome. Critically, when outcomes changed, the new outcome was either "near" to the predicted outcome (same visual category as the predicted picture) or "far" from the predicted outcome (different visual category). Using multivoxel pattern analysis, we indexed cue-evoked reactivation (prediction) within neocortical areas and related these trial-by-trial measures of prediction strength to univariate hippocampal responses to the outcomes. We found that prediction strength positively modulated hippocampal responses to unexpected outcomes, particularly when unexpected outcomes were close, but not identical, to the prediction. Hippocampal responses to unexpected outcomes were also associated with a tradeoff in performance during a subsequent memory test: relatively faster retrieval of new (updated) associations, but relatively slower retrieval of the original (older) associations. Together, these results indicate that hippocampal mismatch signals reflect a comparison between active predictions and current outcomes and that these signals are most robust when predictions are similar, but not identical, to outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although the hippocampus is widely thought to signal "mismatches" between memory-based predictions and outcomes, previous research has not linked hippocampal mismatch signals directly to neural measures of prediction strength. Here, we show that hippocampal mismatch signals increase as a function of the strength of predictions in neocortical regions. This increase in hippocampal mismatch signals was particularly robust when outcomes were similar, but not identical, to predictions. These results indicate that hippocampal mismatch signals are driven by both the active generation of predictions and the similarity between predictions and outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/3612677-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  associative novelty; comparator; default mode network; hippocampus; mismatch; prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27821577      PMCID: PMC5157109          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1850-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  73 in total

1.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Travis Meyer; Carl R Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural correlates of event clusters in past and future thoughts: How the brain integrates specific episodes with autobiographical knowledge.

Authors:  Julie Demblon; Mohamed Ali Bahri; Arnaud D'Argembeau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The dynamics of hippocampal activation during encoding of overlapping sequences.

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Less is more: expectation sharpens representations in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Janneke F M Jehee; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Dynamic neural systems enable adaptive, flexible memories.

Authors:  Marijn C W Kroes; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 7.  The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory.

Authors:  John E Lisman; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Dissociable neural mechanisms for goal-directed versus incidental memory reactivation.

Authors:  Brice A Kuhl; Marcia K Johnson; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Prefrontal-hippocampal pathways underlying inhibitory control over memory.

Authors:  Michael C Anderson; Jamie G Bunce; Helen Barbas
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Linking pattern completion in the hippocampus to predictive coding in visual cortex.

Authors:  Nicholas C Hindy; Felicia Y Ng; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  24 in total

1.  Pattern Separation Underpins Expectation-Modulated Memory.

Authors:  Darya Frank; Marcelo A Montemurro; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, and Hippocampus Differentially Represent the Event Saliency.

Authors:  Anna Jafarpour; Sandon Griffin; Jack J Lin; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Predictability Changes What We Remember in Familiar Temporal Contexts.

Authors:  Hyojeong Kim; Margaret L Schlichting; Alison R Preston; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Hippocampal theta coordinates memory processing during visual exploration.

Authors:  James E Kragel; Stephen VanHaerents; Jessica W Templer; Stephan Schuele; Joshua M Rosenow; Aneesha S Nilakantan; Donna J Bridge
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Consolidation Promotes the Emergence of Representational Overlap in the Hippocampus and Medial Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Alexa Tompary; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Transformation of Event Representations along Middle Temporal Gyrus.

Authors:  Anna Leshinskaya; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Memory integration constructs maps of space, time, and concepts.

Authors:  Neal W Morton; Katherine R Sherrill; Alison R Preston
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-10

9.  Parietal Representations of Stimulus Features Are Amplified during Memory Retrieval and Flexibly Aligned with Top-Down Goals.

Authors:  Serra E Favila; Rosalie Samide; Sarah C Sweigart; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Adaptive Memory Distortions Are Predicted by Feature Representations in Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Yufei Zhao; Avi J H Chanales; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.