Literature DB >> 26057799

The structure of a contact-dependent growth-inhibition (CDI) immunity protein from Neisseria meningitidis MC58.

Kemin Tan1, Parker M Johnson2, Lucy Stols1, Bryan Boubion2, William Eschenfeldt1, Gyorgy Babnigg1, Christopher S Hayes3, Andrezj Joachimiak1, Celia W Goulding2.   

Abstract

Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) is an important mechanism of intercellular competition between neighboring Gram-negative bacteria. CDI systems encode large surface-exposed CdiA effector proteins that carry a variety of C-terminal toxin domains (CdiA-CTs). All CDI(+) bacteria also produce CdiI immunity proteins that specifically bind to the cognate CdiA-CT and neutralize its toxin activity to prevent auto-inhibition. Here, the X-ray crystal structure of a CdiI immunity protein from Neisseria meningitidis MC58 is presented at 1.45 Å resolution. The CdiI protein has structural homology to the Whirly family of RNA-binding proteins, but appears to lack the characteristic nucleic acid-binding motif of this family. Sequence homology suggests that the cognate CdiA-CT is related to the eukaryotic EndoU family of RNA-processing enzymes. A homology model is presented of the CdiA-CT based on the structure of the XendoU nuclease from Xenopus laevis. Molecular-docking simulations predict that the CdiA-CT toxin active site is occluded upon binding to the CdiI immunity protein. Together, these observations suggest that the immunity protein neutralizes toxin activity by preventing access to RNA substrates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CdiA-CT toxin domain; CdiI immunity protein; Neisseria meningitidis; contact-dependent growth inhibition; docking studies; toxin–immunity protein complex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26057799      PMCID: PMC4461334          DOI: 10.1107/S2053230X15006585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun        ISSN: 2053-230X            Impact factor:   1.056


  39 in total

1.  Crystal structures of DNA-Whirly complexes and their role in Arabidopsis organelle genome repair.

Authors:  Laurent Cappadocia; Alexandre Maréchal; Jean-Sébastien Parent; Etienne Lepage; Jurgen Sygusch; Normand Brisson
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Functional characterization of XendoU, the endoribonuclease involved in small nucleolar RNA biosynthesis.

Authors:  Ubaldo Gioia; Pietro Laneve; Mensur Dlakic; Massimo Arceci; Irene Bozzoni; Elisa Caffarelli
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The Structural Biology Center 19ID undulator beamline: facility specifications and protein crystallographic results.

Authors:  Gerd Rosenbaum; Randy W Alkire; Gwyndaf Evans; Frank J Rotella; Krzystof Lazarski; Rong Guang Zhang; Stephan L Ginell; Norma Duke; Istvan Naday; Jack Lazarz; Michael J Molitsky; Lisa Keefe; John Gonczy; Larry Rock; Ruslan Sanishvili; Martin A Walsh; Edwin Westbrook; Andrzej Joachimiak
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 2.616

4.  Contact-dependent inhibition of growth in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Stephanie K Aoki; Rupinderjit Pamma; Aaron D Hernday; Jessica E Bickham; Bruce A Braaten; David A Low
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cleavable C-terminal His-tag vectors for structure determination.

Authors:  William H Eschenfeldt; Natalia Maltseva; Lucy Stols; Mark I Donnelly; Minyi Gu; Boguslaw Nocek; Kemin Tan; Youngchang Kim; Andrzej Joachimiak
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2010-03-06

6.  Novel approach to phasing proteins: derivatization by short cryo-soaking with halides.

Authors:  Z Dauter; M Dauter; K R Rajashankar
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2000-02

Review 7.  Bacterial contact-dependent growth inhibition.

Authors:  Zachary C Ruhe; David A Low; Christopher S Hayes
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 17.079

8.  A 100-kD complex of two RNA-binding proteins from mitochondria of Leishmania tarentolae catalyzes RNA annealing and interacts with several RNA editing components.

Authors:  Ruslan Aphasizhev; Inna Aphasizheva; Robert E Nelson; Larry Simpson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine.

Authors:  Pavel V Afonine; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J Headd; Nigel W Moriarty; Marat Mustyakimov; Thomas C Terwilliger; Alexandre Urzhumtsev; Peter H Zwart; Paul D Adams
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2012-03-16

10.  Meningococcal genetic variation mechanisms viewed through comparative analysis of serogroup C strain FAM18.

Authors:  Stephen D Bentley; George S Vernikos; Lori A S Snyder; Carol Churcher; Claire Arrowsmith; Tracey Chillingworth; Ann Cronin; Paul H Davis; Nancy E Holroyd; Kay Jagels; Mark Maddison; Sharon Moule; Ester Rabbinowitsch; Sarah Sharp; Louise Unwin; Sally Whitehead; Michael A Quail; Mark Achtman; Bart Barrell; Nigel J Saunders; Julian Parkhill
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition (CDI) and CdiB/CdiA Two-Partner Secretion Proteins.

Authors:  Julia L E Willett; Zachary C Ruhe; Celia W Goulding; David A Low; Christopher S Hayes
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Functional plasticity of antibacterial EndoU toxins.

Authors:  Karolina Michalska; Dinh Quan Nhan; Julia L E Willett; Lucy M Stols; William H Eschenfeldt; Allison M Jones; Josephine Y Nguyen; Sanna Koskiniemi; David A Low; Celia W Goulding; Andrzej Joachimiak; Christopher S Hayes
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 3.  Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition in Bacteria: Do Not Get Too Close!

Authors:  Larisa N Ikryannikova; Leonid K Kurbatov; Neonila V Gorokhovets; Andrey A Zamyatnin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.