Literature DB >> 26057452

Circulating microRNAs as prognostic therapy biomarkers in head and neck cancer patients.

I Summerer1, K Unger2, H Braselmann1, L Schuettrumpf3, C Maihoefer3, P Baumeister4, T Kirchner5, M Niyazi3, E Sage6, H M Specht6, G Multhoff7, S Moertl8, C Belka3, H Zitzelsberger2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prediction of therapy response in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) requires biomarkers, which are also a prerequisite for personalised therapy concepts. The current study aimed to identify therapy-responsive microRNAs (miRNAs) in the circulation that can serve as minimally invasive prognostic markers for HNSCC patients undergoing radiotherapy.
METHODS: We screened plasma miRNAs in a discovery cohort of HNSCC patients before therapy and after treatment. We further compared the plasma miRNAs of the patients to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. All miRNAs identified as biomarker candidates were then confirmed in an independent validation cohort of HNSCC patients and tested for correlation with the clinical outcome.
RESULTS: We identified a signature of eight plasma miRNAs that differentiated significantly (P=0.003) between HNSCC patients and healthy donors. MiR-186-5p demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity to classify HNSCC patients and healthy individuals. All therapy-responsive and patient-specific miRNAs in plasma were also detectable in tumour tissues derived from the same patients. High expression of miR-142-3p, miR-186-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-374b-5p and miR-574-3p in the plasma correlated with worse prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Circulating miR-142-3p, miR-186-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-374b-5p and miR-574-3p represent the most promising markers for prognosis and therapy monitoring in the plasma of HNSCC patients. We found strong evidence that the circulating therapy-responsive miRNAs are tumour related and were able to validate them in an independent cohort of HNSCC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26057452      PMCID: PMC4647540          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Squamous cell carcinomas represent the most common malignancies of the head and neck region. About two-thirds of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) exhibit advanced stage disease, usually involving regional lymph nodes (Argiris ). Advanced HNSCC have often a poor prognosis despite intensive local treatment due to tumour recurrences and distant metastases. About 50–60% of patients with advanced disease develop local or regional recurrences after treatment (Hoffmann, 2012). Known risk factors for the development of HNSCC are tobacco use and alcohol consumption (Blot ; Tuyns ), as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, mainly type 16, which particularly increases the risk for tonsillar and oropharyngeal cancers (D'souza ). Human papillomavirus-positive HNSCC tumours have a favourable prognosis (Licitra ; Bledsoe ) and show a better therapy response (Argiris ). Thus, HPV status represents a valuable predictive biomarker that should be taken into consideration for treatment planning to prevent excessive therapy. To date no biomarker for therapy monitoring or patient surveillance is established. Predictive biomarkers in the peripheral blood, such as the newly identified marker HSP70 in HNSCC patients (Gehrmann ), provide a minimally invasive way to predict therapy outcome. Recently, it was shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) in plasma samples exhibit high stability and are resistant to RNase activity (Mitchell ). This stability combined with the good accessibility make circulating miRNAs attractive biomarker candidates. MiRNAs represent a class of promising biomarkers in cancer research since they are highly specific and are associated with pathoclinical parameters of the disease (Sethi ). They can have protective or carcinogenic effects by post-transcriptional regulation of either tumour suppressor genes (Zheng ) or oncogenes (Nohata ). Since miRNAs are part of the cellular stress response they bear a high potential for diagnostic and prognostic use in cancer patients (Li ). The aim of the present study was to evaluate blood plasma miRNAs as minimally invasive biomarkers for radiotherapy monitoring and prognosis. For this purpose, we used a cohort of HNSCC patients with locally advanced and unresectable tumours undergoing radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone, which is the common treatment for these cases (Adelstein ). We previously analysed the therapy effect on the plasma miRNAs by comparing the miRNA profiles in plasma of HNSCC patients before therapy and after the completion of the first two fractions of therapeutic irradiation (Summerer ). MiRNAs showing changed levels were tested in the present study to determine their prognostic value and their potential for predicting the individual tumour response to radio(chemo)therapy. For this purpose, we tested the expression levels of the miRNAs for their correlation with locoregional tumour control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To check for a possible tumour origin of the therapy-regulated plasma miRNAs, we compared miRNA levels in plasma samples from HNSCC patients prior to treatment with an age- and sex-matched group of healthy donors. MiRNAs that were identified as patient-specific markers or as therapy-responsive miRNAs were validated in an independent HNSCC patient cohort. To further support the hypothesis that the detected alterations in plasma miRNAs are tumour related, we analysed tumour biopsies from the same patient cohorts.

Materials and Methods

Patients and samples

Discovery cohort

The discovery cohort comprising 18 HNSCC patients treated with radio(chemo)therapy was described earlier in the study by Summerer . All patients were treated with local X-ray-irradiation using a linear accelerator (6 MV, Siemens Mevatron M, Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA, USA or ELEKTA Synergy, ELEKTA, Stockholm, Sweden). After a planning (PET-)CT scan, 70 Gy of radiation was applied to the macroscopic tumour and involved lymph nodes in daily dose fractions of 2 Gy, 5 days per week. The adjuvant lymphatics were irradiated with up to 50 Gy and the high-risk lymphatics (adjacent to the involved lymph node levels) with up to 60 Gy. Seventeen out of 18 patients received concurrent chemotherapy (13 patients received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus mitomycin C (MMC), 3 patients MMC and 1 patient cisplatin weekly). None of the patients underwent surgical treatment. 5-fluorouracil treatment was usually applied on each of the first 5 days of therapeutic irradiation, whereas MMC was applied only on day 5 and day 36 during radiotherapy. Patient characteristics, therapy conditions and pathoclinical parameters are listed in Table 1. After obtaining informed consent, 15 ml EDTA peripheral blood was collected prior to therapy and after the second fraction of therapeutic irradiation to detect therapy-responsive plasma miRNAs. About 10 μm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) slides from tumour biopsies of 10 out of the 18 patients, which were retrieved prior to therapy, were provided by the Institute of Pathology at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich.
Table 1

Characteristics and clinical parameters of patients in the discovery set

PatientGenderAge (years)aTumour siteHistologyTNMbHPVCumulative dose (Gy)Concomitant therapyAcute toxicitycProgress/death (event=1)Locoregional controld/overall survivale (weeks)
1M80LarynxSCCT3 N1a M0NA70MMCSevere0/081.9/90.0
2M70OropharynxSCCT2 N2c M0NA705-FU/MMCSevere0/138.3/40.9
3M49Maxillary sinusSCCT4 N2c M0705-FU/MMCMild1/115.0/18.9
4M63LarynxSCCT4 N2c M1+60CetuximabSevere0/148.0/52.3
5F63OropharynxSCCT3 N1 M0+705-FU/MMCSevere0/157.1/61.1
6M77OropharynxSCCT2 N2c M0+705-FU/MMCMild0/0144.1/147.1
7M52Oral cavitySCCT4 N2b M0+705-FU/MMCSevere1/116.9/39.4
8F45NasopharynxSCCT2b N1 M070CisplatinSevere1/0117.4/127.9
9M54Paranasal sinusesSCCT4b N0 M0705-FU/MMCSevere0/08.3/21.3
10M47HypopharynxSCCT4 N2c M0705-FU/MMCMild0/0111.3/115.4
11F79Oro/nasopharynxSCCT3 N2b M0705-FU/MMCSevere0/16.0/13.3
12M50LarynxSCCT4 N2c M0705-FU/MMCSevere0/0106.3/113.3
13M46LarynxSCCT1 N2c M0705-FU/MMCMild0/033.7/43.6
14F78OropharynxSCCT1 N2b M0+70MMCNA0/0103.3/108.9
15M70LarynxSCCT3 N2b M0NA705-FU/MMCSevere0/0101.0/106.0
16M57OropharynxSCCT3 N0 M0+705-FU/MMCMild0/0103.3/93.0
17M58Oral cavitySCCT1 N1 M0705-FU/MMCSevere1/14.1/43.7
18M50Oral cavitySCCT1 N0 M070MMCSevere0/152.1/62.7

Abbreviations: F=female; HPV=human papillomavirus; M=male; MMC=mitomycin C; NA=not available; SCC=squamous cell carcinoma; 5-FU=5-fluorouracil.

age at diagnosis, median age: 57.5 years, age range (45.1–80.6 years).

T: primary tumour stage; N: regional lymph node stage; M: distant metastasis.

Mild: I°-II° severe: III° according to CTCAE v4.0 (2009).

Time from start of therapy until last follow-up/death or event.

Time from diagnosis until last follow-up or event.

Validation cohort

For validation of candidate biomarker miRNAs a set of 11 HNSCC patients treated with radiotherapy was selected. Radiotherapy was applied in the same manner as in the discovery cohort. None of the patients underwent surgical treatment. Eight patients received concurrent chemotherapy (five patients cisplatin, two patients MMC and one patient 5-FU plus MMC). For patient 1, cisplatin was applied once per week. For patients 6, 8, 10 and 11 cisplatin was applied in the first and the fifth week of radiotherapy for a period of 5 days in each week. 5-fluorouracil treatment was applied on each of the first 5 days of therapeutic irradiation, whereas MMC was applied only on day 5 and day 36 during radiotherapy. Characteristics, therapy conditions and pathoclinical parameters of the validation cohort are listed in Table 2. Blood samples were obtained prior to therapy and after the second fraction of therapeutic irradiation in the same manner as in the discovery cohort. About 10 μm FFPE slides from tumour biopsies of 4 out of the 11 patients retrieved prior to therapy were provided by the Institute of Pathology at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich.
Table 2

Characteristics and clinical parameters of patients in the validation set

PatientGenderAge (years)aTumour siteHistologyTNMbHPVCumulative dose (Gy)Concomitant therapyAcute toxicitycProgress/death (event=1)Locoregional controld/overall survivale (weeks)
1M58OropharynxSCCT3 N2c Mx70CisplatinMild0/013.3/20.9
2M66LarynxSCCT2 N0 M0+70MMCMild0/046.1/55.4
3M77OropharynxSCCT4 N2a M0+70MMCSevere0/047.0/55.1
4M75HypopharynxSCCT4 N2c M070NoneMild0/123.1/26.9
5F69OropharynxSCCT3 N2c M0NA705-FU/MMCMild0/019.0/24.6
6M55HypopharynxSCCT4a N2b M0NA70CisplatinMild1/032.4/36.3
7M79OropharynxSCCT2c N2c MxNA70NoneMild1/031.3/36.3
8M55LarynxSCCT3 N0 M0NA70CisplatinMild0/013.6/20.1
9M75OropharynxSCCT3 N2 MxNA70NoneMild0/019.0/25.3
10F65OropharynxSCCT4 N2b MxNA70CisplatinMild1/030.3/33.1
11M65OropharynxSCCT2 N0 M0NA70.4CisplatinMild0/049.1/55.1

Abbreviations: F=female; HPV=human papillomavirus; M=male; MMC=mitomycin C; NA=not available; SCC=squamous cell carcinoma; 5-FU=5-fluorouracil.

Age at diagnosis, median age: 66.1 years, age range (55.0–79.8 years).

T: primary tumour stage; N: regional lymph node stage; M: distant metastasis.

Mild: I°-II° Severe: III° according to CTCAE v4.0 (2009).

Time from start of therapy until last follow-up/death or event.

Time from diagnosis until last follow-up or event.

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Munich (Germany).

Healthy donors

Twelve age- and sex-matched controls were selected to elucidate the origin of the plasma miRNA signatures in HNSCC patients. The cohort comprised nine male and three female individuals with a median age of 57.2 years (age range 37–68 years). After obtaining informed consent, EDTA-samples of 8 ml of peripheral blood were collected from healthy volunteers.

RNA extraction from plasma and FFPE tissue

Total RNA was extracted from plasma according to the study by Summerer . Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded-slides were deparaffinised in xylene, washed in isopropanol and rehydrated in ethanol (100 and 70%). After microdissection for removal of normal tissue, RNA was isolated using the RNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) following the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was eluted in RNAse-free water (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with a final volume of 25 μl. Quality assessment using a Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) exhibited OD 260/280 ratios in the range of 1.7 to 2.0.

MicroRNA profiling

MicroRNA profiling in blood plasma samples generated with TaqMan Array Human MicroRNA A Cards v2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) was previously specified in the study by Summerer .

Individual miRNA quantification by qRT–PCR

Quantification of individual miRNAs via qRT–PCR was performed as described before (Summerer ). MiRNAs were considered deregulated when showing a fold change (FC) of 0.75⩽FC⩾1.33 since single qRT–PCR assays usually show smaller FCs than arrays.

Locoregional control and survival analysis

The locoregional control of the tumour was defined as the time from the date of therapy start until last follow-up/death or event. A progress of the primary tumour or metastases in the locoregional lymphatics were considered as an event, whereas distant metastases were not considered as an event. End of follow-up or tumour-independent death was censored. Locoregional control was assessed by CT scan or sonography. Progression-free survival was determined as the time from the date of therapy start until event (death or progress) or last follow-up (censored). Progress was assessed in accordance with the LRC analysis. Overall survival was defined as the time from diagnosis until event (death) or last follow-up (censored). The correlation analysis of miRNA expression with LRC, PFS and OS was based on the results of the single qRT–PCR assays. Patients were split into two groups, displaying either a ΔCt value ≥median ΔCt or

Statistical analysis

The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the plasma miRNA profiles of head and neck cancer patients before radiotherapy and healthy donors. To identify differential miRNA levels in plasma samples of patients prior to radiotherapy and after the second fraction of therapeutic irradiation the Wilcoxon test was performed. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using the top distinctive miRNAs applying the parameters maximum distance and Ward's method. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the R Project for Statistical Computing, 2014.

Results

Plasma miRNAs differentiate between healthy individuals and HNSCC patients

To test the hypothesis of tumour-related miRNA profiles in the plasma of HNSCC patients (discovery cohort), miRNA profiles prior to treatment were compared with miRNA profiles of healthy donors. The median number of detectable miRNAs in patients' plasma was 42.5, whereas the median number of detectable miRNAs in plasma samples of healthy donors was 33.0, which demonstrated a significantly (P=0.017) elevated number of plasma miRNAs in HNSCC patients compared with healthy subjects. About 56 plasma miRNAs displayed differential expression levels between healthy donors and patients (Supplementary Table 1). The majority of miRNAs revealed lower expression levels in the healthy controls, only four miRNAs showed higher expression compared with patients. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on the expression levels of the top 8 differentially expressed miRNAs (miR-21-5p, miR-28-3p, miR-142-3p, miR-186-5p, miR-191-5p, miR-197-3p, miR-425-5p and miR-590-5p) resulted in two main clusters (Supplementary Figure 1). Cluster 1 included 7 healthy donors and 1 patient, while cluster 2 represented 17 patients and 5 healthy donors, which demonstrated a significant (P=0.003) differentiation of patient and healthy donor samples. Technical validation of the array data for healthy donors and HNSCC patients prior to therapy was done with single qRT–PCR assays for selected miRNAs. Due to limited plasma samples, 3 out of 18 patients from the discovery cohort had to be excluded for technical validation. For validation of the patient-specific miRNAs, 11 out of the top 12 distinctive miRNAs were selected. The normalised Ct values resulting from single qRT–PCR assays demonstrated high consensus with the normalised Ct values resulting from the TaqMan array profilling for all of the 11 miRNAs (Supplementary Table 2). Plasma miRNAs that were detectable in ⩽1 healthy donor were tested for their ability to identify HNSCC patients (Table 3). MiR-186-5p demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity.
Table 3

Sensitivity and specificity of patient-specific plasma miRNAs expressed in ⩽1 healthy donor

miRNASensitivitySpecificity
miR-186-5p0.9380.917
miR-374b-5p0.3121.000
miR-28-3p0.6251.000
miR-195-5p0.5621.000
miR-590-5p0.3121.000

Abbreviation: miRNA=microRNA.

Validation of therapy-responsive and patient-specific plasma miRNAs in an independent cohort of HNSCC patients

For an independent validation of the patient-specific and therapy-responsive miRNAs identified in the discovery cohort, expression levels in the plasma of a validation cohort comprising 11 HNSCC patients were determined before therapy and after two fractions of radiotherapy. Each of the 9 candidate therapy-responsive miRNAs that were previously identified in the discovery cohort (Summerer ) showed a deregulation in at least 7 out of the 11 patients in the validation cohort after 2 days of radiotherapy (Supplementary Table 3). Similarly, all of the 10 patient-specific candidate miRNAs identified in the discovery cohort in the present study displayed significantly higher expression levels in the patients of the validation cohort compared with the healthy donors (Supplementary Table 4). MiR-590-5p was not included in the analysis of the patient-specific miRNAs since it was detectable only in 30% of the patients in the discovery cohort.

Expression of plasma miRNAs in tumour tissue of HNSCC patients

To further clarify the origin of the miRNAs in the circulation, we investigated the expression of therapy-responsive and patient-specific plasma miRNAs in tumour biopsies from the same patients. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded-tumour biopsies of 10 patients from the discovery cohort and 4 patients from the validation cohort were enriched for tumour material via microdissection and analysed with single qRT–PCR assays for the patient-specific and therapy-responsive miRNAs. All candidate miRNAs identified in plasma were also detectable in each of the 14 available FFPE tumour samples. The expression levels in plasma did not show significant correlation with the expression levels in the corresponding tumour tissues (Supplementary Table 5).

Plasma miRNAs as prognostic markers

Plasma miRNAs that were identified previously as therapy-responsive candidates in HNSCC patients (Summerer ) as well as tumour-specific miRNAs from the present study were tested for their ability to predict LRC, PFS and OS. We investigated if the expression level of a candidate miRNA prior to therapy or after the second day of treatment correlated with LRC, PFS or OS. We identified candidate miRNAs showing a significant correlation (P<0.05) or a trend for correlation (P<0.2) with LRC, PFS or OS in the discovery cohort (Table 4). High expression levels of miR-186-5p, miR-374b-5p and miR-574-3p prior to treatment correlated with reduced PFS and/or OS, and high expression of miR-28-3p, miR-142-3p, miR-191-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-425-5p and miR-574-3p after treatment showed correlation with worse prognosis. These candidate miRNAs were tested for correlation with LRC, PFS and OS in the validation cohort (Table 5). High expression of miR-186-5p and miR-374b-5p prior to treatment significantly correlated with reduced LRC. MiR-195-5p and miR-574-3p correlated with reduced LRC, when highly expressed after treatment. High expression of miR-142-3p after treatment was validated as a marker for reduced LRC and PFS. We also tested the HPV status as a predictor of LRC, which resulted in a trend (P=0.118) towards better LRC for HPV-positive cases in the discovery cohort (data not shown). Moreover, we tested the therapy-responsive and tumour-specific miRNAs for correlation with the HPV status. None of the candidate miRNAs showed a trend or a significant correlation with the HPV status (data not shown).
Table 4

Correlation of expression of plasma miRNAs with LRC, PFS and OS in 15 HNSCC patients (discovery cohort)

miRNAP-value LRCP-value PFSP-value OS
miR-28-3p (after treatment)0.0690.0270.092
miR-142-3p (after treatment)0.129
miR-186-5p (prior to treatment)0.165
miR-191-5p (after treatment)0.1290.0020.004
miR-195-5p (after treatment)0.0290.130
miR-374b-5p (prior to treatment)0.0390.036
miR-425-5p (after treatment)0.1290.0020.004
miR-574-3p (prior to treatment)0.165
miR-574-3p (after treatment)0.0690.0270.092

Abbreviations: HNSCC=head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; LRC=locoregional control; miRNA=microRNA; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival.

Table 5

Correlation of expression of plasma miRNAs with LRC, PFS and OS in 11 HNSCC patients (validation cohort)

miRNAP-value LRCP-value PFSP-value OS
miR-142-3p (after treatment)0.0250.018
miR-186-5p (prior to treatment)0.025
miR-195-5p (after treatment)0.025
miR-374b-5p (prior to treatment)0.025
miR-574-3p (after treatment)0.025 

Abbreviations: HNSCC=head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; LRC=locoregional control; miRNA=microRNA; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival.

Discussion

In this study we aimed to establish blood plasma miRNAs as minimally invasive biomarkers from the peripheral blood for therapy monitoring and prognosis in HNSCC patients. Further, we intended to shed light on the origin of these miRNAs. The significantly elevated number of detectable miRNAs in the plasma of HNSCC patients compared with healthy individuals is in accordance with previous findings showing that circulating miRNAs are frequently upregulated in cancer (Lawrie ; Heneghan ; Tsujiura ). In our study we found that not only the total number of detectable miRNAs is higher in patients' plasma compared with healthy individuals but also that the majority of miRNAs showed higher expression levels in patients compared with healthy donors. In the discovery cohort of HNSCC patients, a signature of miR-21-5p, miR-28-3p, miR-142-3p, miR-191-5p, miR-186-5p, miR-197-3p, miR-425-5p and miR-590-5p was identified to differentiate between HNSCC patients and healthy individuals. The fact that miR-21-5p, miR-28-3p, miR-142-3p, miR-191-5p and miR-425-5p also represented therapy-responsive miRNAs indicates that these miRNAs are indeed tumour related. Moreover, miR-21-5p is a well-known tumour marker (Xiao-Chun ; Zhu and Xu, 2014) and upregulated miR-28-3p was suggested as a marker for oesophageal carcinoma (Liu ). MiR-142-3p was previously reported to serve as prognostic marker in oesophageal carcinoma (Lin ) and to predict the response to radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer (Hotchi ). Similarly, miR-191-5p was already described as an important biomarker in cancer (Nagpal and Kulshreshtha, 2014) and miR-425-5p was shown to predict survival and disease-free survival in skin cancer patients (Fleming ). We were able to further support the hypothesis that the therapy-responsive plasma miRNAs are most likely tumour related by demonstrating expression of all candidate miRNAs in all available tumour tissues from our patient cohorts. The lack of significant correlation of expression levels in the tumour tissues with the expression levels of the corresponding plasma samples is not surprising. The various mechanisms of tumour miRNAs entering the blood stream, e.g. apoptotic tumour cells or active secretion (Selth ), do not allow the conclusion that tumour tissues show the same expression levels as corresponding plasma samples. Furthermore, tumour biopsies as used in this study do not reflect the miRNA expression levels of the whole tumour. Normal tissue would be also necessary for a meaningful comparison. The therapy-responsive and the tumour-specific miRNAs identified in the discovery cohort were confirmed in an independent patient cohort again suggesting their suitability as predictive markers. MiR-186-5p represented the best candidate in the plasma to differentiate between healthy individuals and HNSCC patients. It also appeared to be a prognostic marker since the expression level showed a trend for correlation with reduced PFS in the discovery cohort and significantly correlated with LRC in the validation cohort. A prognostic potential of miR-186-5p was previously reported for oesophageal and lung carcinoma (Cai ; Zhao ). Circulating miR-374b-5p represents another promising prognostic marker since it exhibited significant correlation with PFS and OS in the discovery cohort and with LRC in the validation set prior to treatment. This is supported by a study suggesting a prognostic potential of this miRNA in prostate cancer (He ). The additional miRNA candidates miR-142-3p, miR-195-5p and miR-574-3p from this study correlated with prognosis after 2 days of treatment indicating that they might be useful tools for therapy monitoring. MiR-574-3p is known as a stress-responsive miRNA, which was shown previously to serve as a prognostic marker in the serum of glioblastoma patients (Manterola ). Moreover, it is published that it modulates the therapy response in breast cancer patients (Ujihira ), which makes it a promising candidate for therapy monitoring in HNSCC. Similarly, miR-195-5p is a well-known marker in the circulation of cancer patients (Igglezou ) and was previously identified as prognostic marker in oesophageal carcinoma (Sun ). The correlation of the therapy-responsive miR-142-3p with LRC suggests miR-142-3p as a marker for therapy success. An oncogenic role for miR-142-3p was shown in a previous study (Lv ) supporting the potential use of this miRNA as a prognostic biomarker. The ability to predict the response to therapy might decrease treatment failure and avoid patients' exposure to the side effects of ineffective therapies. The applicability of all five miRNAs as prognostic markers is further supported by the fact that these miRNA markers represent obviously tumour-related miRNAs. Circulating miRNAs are known to be deregulated in cancer and to predict early disease (Healy ). Their good availability as well as their stability makes them useful biomarker candidates. In the present study, we discovered miR-142-3p, miR-186-5p, miR-374b-5p, miR-195-5p and miR-574-3p as the most promising HPV-independent markers for prognosis in the plasma of HNSCC patients treated with combined radiochemotherapy. Studies including a higher number of patients are needed to further validate the prognostic value of these marker miRNAs. We further showed that the same miRNAs were significantly overexpressed in plasma of HNSCC patients compared to healthy individuals, which supports the hypothesis that they originate from the tumour. Our findings represent an important contribution towards a clinical use of plasma miRNAs for therapy monitoring and a potential use in personalised treatment strategies.
  35 in total

1.  Tumor suppressive microRNA-375 regulates oncogene AEG-1/MTDH in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Authors:  Nijiro Nohata; Toyoyuki Hanazawa; Naoko Kikkawa; Muradil Mutallip; Daiju Sakurai; Lisa Fujimura; Kazumori Kawakami; Takeshi Chiyomaru; Hirofumi Yoshino; Hideki Enokida; Masayuki Nakagawa; Yoshitaka Okamoto; Naohiko Seki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  High-risk human papillomavirus affects prognosis in patients with surgically treated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lisa Licitra; Federica Perrone; Paolo Bossi; Simona Suardi; Luigi Mariani; Raffaella Artusi; Maria Oggionni; Chiara Rossini; Giulio Cantù; Massimo Squadrelli; Pasquale Quattrone; Laura D Locati; Cristiana Bergamini; Patrizia Olmi; Marco A Pierotti; Silvana Pilotti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Kinetics of circulating levels of miR-195, miR-155 and miR-21 in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy.

Authors:  Maria Igglezou; Katerina Vareli; Georgios K Georgiou; Ioannis Sainis; Evangelos Briasoulis
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 4.  Systemic mirnas as potential biomarkers for malignancy.

Authors:  N A Healy; H M Heneghan; N Miller; C K Osborne; R Schiff; M J Kerin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  A small noncoding RNA signature found in exosomes of GBM patient serum as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Lorea Manterola; Elizabeth Guruceaga; Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya; Marisol González-Huarriz; Patricia Jauregui; Sonia Tejada; Ricardo Diez-Valle; Victor Segura; Nicolás Samprón; Cristina Barrena; Irune Ruiz; Amaia Agirre; Angel Ayuso; Javier Rodríguez; Alvaro González; Enric Xipell; Ander Matheu; Adolfo López de Munain; Teresa Tuñón; Idoya Zazpe; Jesús García-Foncillas; Sophie Paris; Jean Yves Delattre; Marta M Alonso
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Circulating microRNAs in plasma of patients with gastric cancers.

Authors:  M Tsujiura; D Ichikawa; S Komatsu; A Shiozaki; H Takeshita; T Kosuga; H Konishi; R Morimura; K Deguchi; H Fujiwara; K Okamoto; E Otsuji
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Gypsyamber D'Souza; Aimee R Kreimer; Raphael Viscidi; Michael Pawlita; Carole Fakhry; Wayne M Koch; William H Westra; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  miR-191: an emerging player in disease biology.

Authors:  Neha Nagpal; Ritu Kulshreshtha
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Overexpression of miRNA-21 promotes radiation-resistance of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-chun Wang; Wei Wang; Zhu-Bo Zhang; Jing Zhao; Xiao-Gang Tan; Jian-Chao Luo
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  MicroRNA-21 identified as predictor of cancer outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenjie Zhu; Binghe Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  46 in total

1.  Potential biomarkers for radiosensitivity in head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Sherly Pardo-Reoyo; J L Roig-Lopez; Eddy S Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

2.  Gene Expression Studies for the Development of Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 3.  Applications of Extracellular RNAs in Oncology.

Authors:  Jonathan R Thompson; Jing Zhu; Deepak Kilari; Liang Wang
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  MicroRNAs in Cancer: challenges and opportunities in early detection, disease monitoring, and therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Namita Chatterjee; Shushan Rana; Cristina Espinosa-Diez; Sudarshan Anand
Journal:  Curr Pathobiol Rep       Date:  2017-01-19

Review 5.  Liquid Biopsy in Head and Neck Cancer: Promises and Challenges.

Authors:  T Nonaka; D T W Wong
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 8.924

6.  Reproducibility of quantitative real-time PCR assay in microRNA expression profiling and comparison with microarray analysis in narcolepsy.

Authors:  Zhenhua Liu; Liling Yang; Yingzi Zhao; Minglu Tang; Fumin Wang; Xiaoting Wang; Guanzhen Li; Yifeng Du
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-12-24

7.  MicroRNA expression analysis in high fat diet-induced NAFLD-NASH-HCC progression: study on C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Alessandra Tessitore; Germana Cicciarelli; Filippo Del Vecchio; Agata Gaggiano; Daniela Verzella; Mariafausta Fischietti; Valentina Mastroiaco; Antonella Vetuschi; Roberta Sferra; Remo Barnabei; Daria Capece; Francesca Zazzeroni; Edoardo Alesse
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  MicroRNA-142-3p inhibits hypoxia/reoxygenation‑induced apoptosis and fibrosis of cardiomyocytes by targeting high mobility group box 1.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Min Ouyang; Qiong Wang; Zaijin Jian
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 9.  Involvement and Clinical Aspects of MicroRNA in Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Ram Mohan Ram Kumar; Aleksandar Boro; Bruno Fuchs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Blood-based circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of head and neck cancer-a systematic review.

Authors:  Shankargouda Patil; Saman Warnakulasuriya
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.