Literature DB >> 26049065

Past Tense Production in Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment Across Germanic Languages: A Meta-Analysis.

Windi C Krok, Laurence B Leonard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the extent to which children with specific language impairment (SLI) across Germanic languages differ from their typically developing (TD) peers in the use of past tense morphology.
METHOD: A systematic literature search identified empirical studies examining regular and/or irregular past tense production by English and non-English Germanic-speaking children with SLI and their TD peers. Data from qualifying studies were extracted and converted to Hedges's g effect sizes.
RESULTS: Seventeen English and 8 non-English Germanic studies met inclusionary criteria. Comparing children with SLI and their TD age-matched (TDA) peers resulted in large combined effect sizes for English and non-English Germanic regular and irregular past tense production. Comparisons between children with SLI and their TD younger (TDY) peers also revealed large combined effect sizes for English and non-English Germanic regular past tense production. Effect sizes for studies comparing SLI and TDY irregular past tense production were large for non-English Germanic-speaking children and moderate for English-speaking children.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that children with SLI across Germanic languages do indeed have more difficulty marking verbs for past tense than TDA and TDY peers. The findings suggest that the potential value of past tense production as a clinical marker of SLI may well extend beyond English.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26049065      PMCID: PMC4765199          DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  42 in total

1.  Recast density and acquisition of novel irregular past tense verbs.

Authors:  Kerry Proctor-Williams; Marc E Fey
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Specific language impairment is not specific to language: the procedural deficit hypothesis.

Authors:  Michael T Ullman; Elizabeth I Pierpont
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder.

Authors:  M Gopnik; M B Crago
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-04

4.  Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: a discriminant function analysis.

Authors:  L M Bedore; L B Leonard
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  L B Leonard; J A Eyer; L M Bedore; B G Grela
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI).

Authors:  G Conti-Ramsden; N Botting; B Faragher
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  Specific language impairment: a deficit in grammar or processing?

Authors:  M F Joanisse; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive.

Authors:  M L Rice; K Wexler; P L Cleave
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-08

9.  Language-specific effects of task demands on the manifestation of specific language impairment: a comparison of English and Icelandic.

Authors:  Elin Thordardottir
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Profiles of grammatical morphology and sentence imitation in children with specific language impairment and Down syndrome.

Authors:  P A Eadie; M E Fey; J M Douglas; C L Parsons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comprehension of Mandarin Aspect Markers by Preschool Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Lijun Chen; Stephanie Durrleman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Tense Marking in the Kindergarten Population: Testing the Bimodal Distribution Hypothesis.

Authors:  Brian Weiler; C Melanie Schuele
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Language Proficiency and Sustained Attention in Monolingual and Bilingual Children with and without Language Impairment.

Authors:  Tessel Boerma; Paul Leseman; Frank Wijnen; Elma Blom
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-21

4.  Specific Language Impairment in African American English and Southern White English: Measures of Tense and Agreement With Dialect-Informed Probes and Strategic Scoring.

Authors:  Janna B Oetting; Jessica R Berry; Kyomi D Gregory; Andrew M Rivière; Janet McDonald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Marking of Tense and Agreement in Language Samples by Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment in African American English and Southern White English: Evaluation of Scoring Approaches and Cut Scores Across Structures.

Authors:  Janna B Oetting; Andrew M Rivière; Jessica R Berry; Kyomi D Gregory; Tina M Villa; Janet McDonald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.297

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.