Literature DB >> 12199402

Profiles of grammatical morphology and sentence imitation in children with specific language impairment and Down syndrome.

P A Eadie1, M E Fey, J M Douglas, C L Parsons.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the grammatical morphology and sentence imitation performance of two different groups of children with language impairment and to compare their performance with that of children learning language typically. Expressive use of tense-bearing and non-tense-related grammatical morphemes was explored. Children with specific language impairment (SLI), with Down syndrome (DS), and with typical language development (TL) were matched on mean length of utterance (MW). Performance was compared primarily on composite measures of tense, tense inflections, and non-tense morphemes, as well as on the Sentences subtest of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R; D. Wechsler, 1989). Exploratory analyses were completed on a set of 11 individual grammatical morphemes as a follow-up to the principal analyses. As predicted, the children with SLI performed significantly more poorly than the children with TL on all three composite measures. In addition, the DS group exhibited significantly weaker performance than did the TL group on the tense inflections and non-tense morpheme composites. Although there were no statistically reliable differences between the SLI and DS groups on any morpheme measure, the groups were not comparably weak in their use of the regular post, -ed; the irregular third person singular morphemes (e.g., has, does); the present progressive, -ing; or the use of modals. The SLI and DS groups both performed more poorly than did the TL group on the sentence imitation task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12199402     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/058)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  36 in total

1.  Language Characteristics of Individuals with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Gary E Martin; Jessica Klusek; Bruno Estigarribia; Joanne E Roberts
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2009-04

2.  Expressive language profiles of verbally expressive adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome or fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Lizbeth H Finestack; Leonard Abbeduto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Language phenotypes and intervention planning: bridging research and practice.

Authors:  Deborah J Fidler; Amy Philofsky; Susan L Hepburn
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2007

4.  Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions.

Authors:  Janet L McDonald
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

5.  Longitudinal profiles of expressive vocabulary, syntax and pragmatic language in boys with fragile X syndrome or Down syndrome.

Authors:  Gary E Martin; Molly Losh; Bruno Estigarribia; John Sideris; Joanne Roberts
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Language learning of children with typical development using a deductive metalinguistic procedure.

Authors:  Lizbeth H Finestack
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Kindergarten Predictors of Third Grade Writing.

Authors:  Young-Suk Kim; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jeanne Wanzek
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2015-01-01

8.  Comparing Tense and Agreement Productivity in Boys With Fragile X Syndrome, Children With Developmental Language Disorder, and Children With Typical Development.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hilvert; Jill Hoover; Audra Sterling; Susen Schroeder
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Effects of Specific Language Impairment on a Contrastive Dialect Structure: The Case of Infinitival TO Across Various Nonmainstream Dialects of English.

Authors:  Andrew M Rivière; Janna B Oetting; Joseph Roy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Judgments of omitted BE and DO in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of specific language impairment (SLI) to 15 years: a study of growth and asymptote.

Authors:  Mabel L Rice; Lesa Hoffman; Ken Wexler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.