Literature DB >> 33529048

Tense Marking in the Kindergarten Population: Testing the Bimodal Distribution Hypothesis.

Brian Weiler1, C Melanie Schuele2.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore whether evidence for a bimodal distribution of tense marking, previously documented in clinically referred samples, exists in a population-based sample of kindergarten children from a rural county in Tennessee. Method A measure of tense marking, the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (TEGI) Screening Test, was individually administered to consented kindergarten students (N = 153) across three elementary schools in a single school district. The consented children constituted 73% of kindergartners in the district. Cluster analysis was used to evaluate the number and composition of latent classes that best fit the distribution of the TEGI Screening Test scores. Results Analysis of the scores revealed a distribution that deviated significantly from normality. Cluster analyses (Ward's, k-means, single linkage) revealed a two-cluster solution as the best fitting model. The very large effect-size difference in mean TEGI Screening Test score between the two clusters (d = 4.77) provides validation of an identifiable boundary delineating typical from atypical tense marking in this sample of kindergartners. The difference in tense marking across the two clusters was not attributable to child chronological age. The percentage of the sample comprising the low-performing cluster aligns with specific language impairment and developmental language disorder prevalence estimates. Conclusion Additional demonstrations of a bimodal distribution of tense marking in future studies with carefully defined samples could strengthen the clinical marker evidence and utility of this linguistic feature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33529048      PMCID: PMC9150687          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.674


  58 in total

1.  Nonmainstream dialect use and specific language impairment.

Authors:  J B Oetting; J L McDonald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Differences in the performance of children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers on nonverbal cognitive tests: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erica Gallinat; Tammie J Spaulding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  A Multiyear Population-Based Study of Kindergarten Language Screening Failure Rates Using the Rice Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment.

Authors:  Brian Weiler; C Melanie Schuele; Jacob I Feldman; Hannah Krimm
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Acquisition of tense marking in English-speaking children with cochlear implants: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ling-Yu Guo; Linda J Spencer; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2013-01-03

5.  Fourteen-year follow-up of speech/language-impaired and control children: psychiatric outcome.

Authors:  J H Beitchman; B Wilson; C J Johnson; L Atkinson; A Young; E Adlaf; M Escobar; L Douglas
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Difference Versus Deficit in Child African American English.

Authors:  Harry N Seymour; Linda Bland-Stewart; Lisa J Green
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Dialectal forms during discourse of poor, urban, African American preschoolers.

Authors:  J A Washington; H K Craig
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-08

Review 8.  The epidemiology of hearing impairment in the United States: newborns, children, and adolescents.

Authors:  Saral Mehra; Roland D Eavey; Donald G Keamy
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Children's marking of verbal -s by nonmainstream English dialect and clinical status.

Authors:  Lesli H Cleveland; Janna B Oetting
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.