Literature DB >> 26047903

Accuracy of flat panel detector CT with integrated navigational software with and without MR fusion for single-pass needle placement.

Marc C Mabray1, Sanjit Datta2, Prasheel V Lillaney1, Teri Moore2, Sonja Gehrisch2, Jason F Talbott1, Michael R Levitt3, Basavaraj V Ghodke4, Paul S Larson5, Daniel L Cooke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopic systems in modern interventional suites have the ability to perform flat panel detector CT (FDCT) with navigational guidance. Fusion with MR allows navigational guidance towards FDCT occult targets. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of this system using single-pass needle placement in a deep brain stimulation (DBS) phantom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR was performed on a head phantom with DBS lead targets. The head phantom was placed into fixation and FDCT was performed. FDCT and MR datasets were automatically fused using the integrated guidance system (iGuide, Siemens). A DBS target was selected on the MR dataset. A 10 cm, 19 G needle was advanced by hand in a single pass using laser crosshair guidance. Radial error was visually assessed against measurement markers on the target and by a second FDCT. Ten needles were placed using CT-MR fusion and 10 needles were placed without MR fusion, with targeting based solely on FDCT and fusion steps repeated for every pass.
RESULTS: Mean radial error was 2.75±1.39 mm as defined by visual assessment to the centre of the DBS target and 2.80±1.43 mm as defined by FDCT to the centre of the selected target point. There were no statistically significant differences in error between MR fusion and non-MR guided series.
CONCLUSIONS: Single pass needle placement in a DBS phantom using FDCT guidance is associated with a radial error of approximately 2.5-3.0 mm at a depth of approximately 80 mm. This system could accurately target sub-centimetre intracranial lesions defined on MR. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Intervention; MRI; Navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26047903      PMCID: PMC5380922          DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  32 in total

1.  Mechanical accuracy of a new stereotactic guide.

Authors:  T Brommeland; R Hennig
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles.

Authors:  A C Miracle; S K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Visualisation of intracerebral haemorrhage with flat-detector CT compared to multislice CT: results in 44 cases.

Authors:  Tobias Struffert; Gregor Richter; Tobias Engelhorn; Marc Doelken; Philipp Goelitz; Willi A Kalender; Oliver Ganslandt; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Clinical validation of true frameless stereotactic biopsy: analysis of the first 125 consecutive cases.

Authors:  T S Paleologos; N L Dorward; J P Wadley; D G Thomas
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  A new procedure for frameless computer navigated stereotaxy.

Authors:  T Brommeland; R Hennig
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Effective dose during needle interventions: cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance.

Authors:  Sicco J Braak; Marco J L van Strijen; Hendrik W van Es; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Johannes P M van Heesewijk
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype.

Authors:  M J Daly; J H Siewerdsen; D J Moseley; D A Jaffray; J C Irish
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions.

Authors:  Nico Buls; Jessica Pagés; Johan de Mey; Michel Osteaux
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Accuracy and clinical use of a novel aiming device for frameless stereotactic brain biopsy.

Authors:  G Widmann; W Eisner; P Kovacs; T Fiegele; M Ortler; T B Lang; R Stoffner; R Bale
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2008-12-05

10.  Clinical outcomes of PD patients having bilateral STN DBS using high-field interventional MR-imaging for lead placement.

Authors:  Jill L Ostrem; Nicholas B Galifianakis; Leslie C Markun; Jamie K Grace; Alastair J Martin; Philip A Starr; Paul S Larson
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.876

View more
  2 in total

1.  Feasibility of laser-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine using a hybrid-OR.

Authors:  P H Richter; F Gebhard; M Salameh; K Schuetze; M Kraus
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  How to iGuide: flat panel detector, CT-assisted, minimally invasive evacuation of intracranial hematomas.

Authors:  David Dornbos Iii; Cathra Halabi; Julie DiNitto; Kerstin Mueller; David Fiorella; Daniel L Cooke; Adam S Arthur
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 8.572

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.