Literature DB >> 12938963

Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions.

Nico Buls1, Jessica Pagés, Johan de Mey, Michel Osteaux.   

Abstract

As CT scanners are more routinely used as a guidance tool for various types of interventional radiological procedures, concern has grown for high patient and staff doses. CT fluoroscopy provides the physician immediate feedback and can be a valuable tool to dynamically assist various types of percutaneous interventions. However, the fixed position of the scanning plane in combination with high exposure factors may lead to high cumulative patient skin doses that can reach deterministic threshold limits. The staff is also exposed to a considerable amount of scatter radiation while standing next to the patient during the procedures. Although some studies have been published dealing with this subject, data of patient skin doses determined by direct in vivo dosimetry remains scarce. The purpose of this study is to quantify and to evaluate both patient and staff doses by direct thermoluminescent dosimetry during various clinical CT fluoroscopy guided procedures. Patient doses were quantified by determining the entrance skin dose with direct thermoluminescent dosimetry and by estimating the effective dose (E). Staff doses were quantified by determining the entrance skin dose at the level of the eyes, thyroid, and both the hands with direct thermoluminescent dosimetry. For a group of 82 consecutive patients, the following median values were determined (data per procedure): patient E (19.7 mSv), patient entrance skin dose (374 mSv), staff entrance skin dose at eye level (0.21 mSv), thyroid (0.24 mSv), at the left hand (0.18 mSv), and at the right hand (0.76 mSv). The maximum recorded patient entrance skin dose stayed well below the deterministic threshold level of 2 Gy. Poor correlation between both patient/staff doses and integrated procedure mAs emphasizes the need for in vivo measurements. CT fluoroscopy doses are markedly higher than classic CT-scan doses and are comparable to doses from other interventional radiological procedures. They consequently require adequate radiation protection management. An important potential for dose reduction exists by limiting the fluoroscopic screening time and by reducing the tube current (mA) to a level sufficient to provide adequate image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12938963     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200308000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of flat panel detector CT with integrated navigational software with and without MR fusion for single-pass needle placement.

Authors:  Marc C Mabray; Sanjit Datta; Prasheel V Lillaney; Teri Moore; Sonja Gehrisch; Jason F Talbott; Michael R Levitt; Basavaraj V Ghodke; Paul S Larson; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.836

2.  Effect of Body Habitus on Radiation Dose During CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Spine Injections.

Authors:  Ronald J Viola; Giao B Nguyen; Terry T Yoshizumi; Sandra S Stinnett; Jenny K Hoang; Peter G Kranz
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 3.  Occupational adverse effects and protective factors in bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Chong Bai
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Dose to the interventional radiologist in CTF-guided procedures.

Authors:  J G Alves; S Sarmento; J S Pereira; M F Pereira; M J Sousa; L Cunha; A Dias; A D Oliveira; J V Cardoso; L M Santos; J Lencart; M Gouvêa; J A M Santos
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Ultra-Low Radiation Dose CT Fluoroscopy for Percutaneous Interventions: A Porcine Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Martin G Wagner; J Louis Hinshaw; Yinsheng Li; Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Paul Laeseke; Charles A Mistretta; Fred T Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Comparison of air kerma between C-arm CT and 64-multidetector-row CT using a phantom.

Authors:  Seiki Hosokawa; Nobuyuki Kawai; Morio Sato; Hiroki Minamiguchi; Motoki Nakai; Kazuhiro Murotani; Tadayoshi Nishioku; Shintaro Shirai; Tetsuo Sonomura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  C-arm cone-beam computed tomography needle path overlay for percutaneous biopsy of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Chiara Floridi; Alessandra Muollo; Federico Fontana; Nicola Rotolo; Anna Maria Ierardi; Ejona Duka; Carlo Pellegrino; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Evaluation of surface dose and image quality using the half-scan mode in chest computed tomography-guided interventional radiology: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hiroaki Hasegawa; Jiro Sato; Ikuo Kobayashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-02-27

Review 9.  Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers.

Authors:  John Boice; Lawrence T Dauer; Kenneth R Kase; Fred A Mettler; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.