Literature DB >> 26041921

Neuro-oscillatory phase alignment drives speeded multisensory response times: an electro-corticographic investigation.

Manuel R Mercier1, Sophie Molholm2, Ian C Fiebelkorn3, John S Butler4, Theodore H Schwartz5, John J Foxe6.   

Abstract

Even simple tasks rely on information exchange between functionally distinct and often relatively distant neuronal ensembles. Considerable work indicates oscillatory synchronization through phase alignment is a major agent of inter-regional communication. In the brain, different oscillatory phases correspond to low- and high-excitability states. Optimally aligned phases (or high-excitability states) promote inter-regional communication. Studies have also shown that sensory stimulation can modulate or reset the phase of ongoing cortical oscillations. For example, auditory stimuli can reset the phase of oscillations in visual cortex, influencing processing of a simultaneous visual stimulus. Such cross-regional phase reset represents a candidate mechanism for aligning oscillatory phase for inter-regional communication. Here, we explored the role of local and inter-regional phase alignment in driving a well established behavioral correlate of multisensory integration: the redundant target effect (RTE), which refers to the fact that responses to multisensory inputs are substantially faster than to unisensory stimuli. In a speeded detection task, human epileptic patients (N = 3) responded to unisensory (auditory or visual) and multisensory (audiovisual) stimuli with a button press, while electrocorticography was recorded over auditory and motor regions. Visual stimulation significantly modulated auditory activity via phase reset in the delta and theta bands. During the period between stimulation and subsequent motor response, transient synchronization between auditory and motor regions was observed. Phase synchrony to multisensory inputs was faster than to unisensory stimulation. This sensorimotor phase alignment correlated with behavior such that stronger synchrony was associated with faster responses, linking the commonly observed RTE with phase alignment across a sensorimotor network.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/358546-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECoG; EEG; motor; multisensory; oscillations; synchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26041921      PMCID: PMC6605331          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4527-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Multisensory Integration Reveals Temporal Coding across a Human Sensorimotor Network.

Authors:  Bartlett D Moore; Eleonora Bartoli; Suganya Karunakaran; Kamin Kim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Oscillatory phase shapes syllable perception.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Neural Noise Hypothesis of Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Roeland Hancock; Kenneth R Pugh; Fumiko Hoeft
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Effects of auditory selective attention on neural phase: individual differences and short-term training.

Authors:  Aeron Laffere; Fred Dick; Adam Tierney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Attention Periodically Binds Visual Features As Single Events Depending on Neural Oscillations Phase-Locked to Action.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Isamu Motoyoshi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.

Authors:  Michael J Crosse; Giovanni M Di Liberto; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The intraparietal sulcus governs multisensory integration of audiovisual information based on task difficulty.

Authors:  Christina Regenbogen; Janina Seubert; Emilia Johansson; Andreas Finkelmeyer; Patrik Andersson; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Spatial Attention and Temporal Expectation Exert Differential Effects on Visual and Auditory Discrimination.

Authors:  Anna Wilsch; Manuel R Mercier; Jonas Obleser; Charles E Schroeder; Saskia Haegens
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Crossmodal Phase Reset and Evoked Responses Provide Complementary Mechanisms for the Influence of Visual Speech in Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Pierre Mégevand; Manuel R Mercier; David M Groppe; Elana Zion Golumbic; Nima Mesgarani; Michael S Beauchamp; Charles E Schroeder; Ashesh D Mehta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  High-gamma band fronto-temporal coherence as a measure of functional connectivity in speech motor control.

Authors:  J Kingyon; R Behroozmand; R Kelley; H Oya; H Kawasaki; N S Narayanan; J D W Greenlee
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.