Literature DB >> 32319865

Spatial Attention and Temporal Expectation Exert Differential Effects on Visual and Auditory Discrimination.

Anna Wilsch1, Manuel R Mercier2,3, Jonas Obleser4,5, Charles E Schroeder6,7, Saskia Haegens6,8.   

Abstract

Anticipation of an impending stimulus shapes the state of the sensory systems, optimizing neural and behavioral responses. Here, we studied the role of brain oscillations in mediating spatial and temporal anticipations. Because spatial attention and temporal expectation are often associated with visual and auditory processing, respectively, we directly contrasted the visual and auditory modalities and asked whether these anticipatory mechanisms are similar in both domains. We recorded the magnetoencephalogram in healthy human participants performing an auditory and visual target discrimination task, in which cross-modal cues provided both temporal and spatial information with regard to upcoming stimulus presentation. Motivated by prior findings, we were specifically interested in delta (1-3 Hz) and alpha (8-13 Hz) band oscillatory state in anticipation of target presentation and their impact on task performance. Our findings support the view that spatial attention has a stronger effect in the visual domain, whereas temporal expectation effects are more prominent in the auditory domain. For the spatial attention manipulation, we found a typical pattern of alpha lateralization in the visual system, which correlated with response speed. Providing a rhythmic temporal cue led to increased postcue synchronization of low-frequency rhythms, although this effect was more broadband in nature, suggesting a general phase reset rather than frequency-specific neural entrainment. In addition, we observed delta-band synchronization with a frontal topography, which correlated with performance, especially in the auditory task. Combined, these findings suggest that spatial and temporal anticipations operate via a top-down modulation of the power and phase of low-frequency oscillations, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32319865      PMCID: PMC8078477          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  81 in total

1.  Attentional modulation of the somatosensory mu rhythm.

Authors:  K L Anderson; M Ding
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  The phase of ongoing oscillations mediates the causal relation between brain excitation and visual perception.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Philippe Marque; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The spectrotemporal filter mechanism of auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Gabriella Musacchia; Monica N O'Connel; Arnaud Y Falchier; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Human information processing and sensory modality: cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory, and deficit.

Authors:  D Freides
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Neural Entrainment and Attentional Selection in the Listening Brain.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Auditory-driven phase reset in visual cortex: human electrocorticography reveals mechanisms of early multisensory integration.

Authors:  Manuel R Mercier; John J Foxe; Ian C Fiebelkorn; John S Butler; Theodore H Schwartz; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Behavioural dissociation between exogenous and endogenous temporal orienting of attention.

Authors:  Gustavo Rohenkohl; Jennifer T Coull; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23

Review 10.  The Involvement of Endogenous Neural Oscillations in the Processing of Rhythmic Input: More Than a Regular Repetition of Evoked Neural Responses.

Authors:  Benedikt Zoefel; Sanne Ten Oever; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neural Encoding and Representation of Time for Sensorimotor Control and Learning.

Authors:  Ramesh Balasubramaniam; Saskia Haegens; Mehrdad Jazayeri; Hugo Merchant; Dagmar Sternad; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Entrainment revisited: a commentary on.

Authors:  Saskia Haegens
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Neural oscillations are a start toward understanding brain activity rather than the end.

Authors:  Keith B Doelling; M Florencia Assaneo
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Delta/Theta band EEG activity shapes the rhythmic perceptual sampling of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Cora Kubetschek; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Context dependency of time-based event-related expectations for different modalities.

Authors:  Felix Ball; Julia Andreca; Toemme Noesselt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-28

6.  No behavioural evidence for rhythmic facilitation of perceptual discrimination.

Authors:  Wy Ming Lin; Djamari A Oetringer; Iske Bakker-Marshall; Jill Emmerzaal; Anna Wilsch; Hesham A ElShafei; Elie Rassi; Saskia Haegens
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.698

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.