Literature DB >> 29235185

The intraparietal sulcus governs multisensory integration of audiovisual information based on task difficulty.

Christina Regenbogen1,2,3, Janina Seubert1,4, Emilia Johansson1, Andreas Finkelmeyer5, Patrik Andersson1,6, Johan N Lundström1,7,8.   

Abstract

Object recognition benefits maximally from multimodal sensory input when stimulus presentation is noisy, or degraded. Whether this advantage can be attributed specifically to the extent of overlap in object-related information, or rather, to object-unspecific enhancement due to the mere presence of additional sensory stimulation, remains unclear. Further, the cortical processing differences driving increased multisensory integration (MSI) for degraded compared with clear information remain poorly understood. Here, two consecutive studies first compared behavioral benefits of audio-visual overlap of object-related information, relative to conditions where one channel carried information and the other carried noise. A hierarchical drift diffusion model indicated performance enhancement when auditory and visual object-related information was simultaneously present for degraded stimuli. A subsequent fMRI study revealed visual dominance on a behavioral and neural level for clear stimuli, while degraded stimulus processing was mainly characterized by activation of a frontoparietal multisensory network, including IPS. Connectivity analyses indicated that integration of degraded object-related information relied on IPS input, whereas clear stimuli were integrated through direct information exchange between visual and auditory sensory cortices. These results indicate that the inverse effectiveness observed for identification of degraded relative to clear objects in behavior and brain activation might be facilitated by selective recruitment of an executive cortical network which uses IPS as a relay mediating crossmodal sensory information exchange.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  intraparietal sulcus; multisensory integration; perception threshold; principle of inverse effectiveness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29235185      PMCID: PMC6866436          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  51 in total

1.  How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making.

Authors:  Ulrike Basten; Guido Biele; Hauke R Heekeren; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bayesian-based integration of multisensory naturalistic perithreshold stimuli.

Authors:  Christina Regenbogen; Emilia Johansson; Patrik Andersson; Mats J Olsson; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Audiovisual integration in human superior temporal sulcus: Inverse effectiveness and the neural processing of speech and object recognition.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Thomas W James
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Oscillatory mechanisms underlying the enhancement of visual motion perception by multisensory congruency.

Authors:  Stephanie Gleiss; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Peter T Fox; Karla L Miller; David C Glahn; P Mickle Fox; Clare E Mackay; Nicola Filippini; Kate E Watkins; Roberto Toro; Angela R Laird; Christian F Beckmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.

Authors:  M I Posner; M J Nissen; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Noise alters beta-band activity in superior temporal cortex during audiovisual speech processing.

Authors:  Inga M Schepers; Till R Schneider; Joerg F Hipp; Andreas K Engel; Daniel Senkowski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Causal inference in multisensory perception.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Ulrik Beierholm; Wei Ji Ma; Steven Quartz; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Patric Hagmann; Leila Cammoun; Xavier Gigandet; Reto Meuli; Christopher J Honey; Van J Wedeen; Olaf Sporns
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  The angular gyrus: multiple functions and multiple subdivisions.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 7.519

View more
  5 in total

1.  Meta-Analyses Support a Taxonomic Model for Representations of Different Categories of Audio-Visual Interaction Events in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Matt Csonka; Nadia Mardmomen; Paula J Webster; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Chris Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-01-18

2.  The intraparietal sulcus governs multisensory integration of audiovisual information based on task difficulty.

Authors:  Christina Regenbogen; Janina Seubert; Emilia Johansson; Andreas Finkelmeyer; Patrik Andersson; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Monkeys and humans implement causal inference to simultaneously localize auditory and visual stimuli.

Authors:  Jeff T Mohl; John M Pearson; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural Basis of the Sound-Symbolic Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pseudowords and Visual Shapes.

Authors:  Kelly McCormick; Simon Lacey; Randall Stilla; Lynne C Nygaard; K Sathian
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Audio-visual and olfactory-visual integration in healthy participants and subjects with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Susanne Stickel; Pauline Weismann; Thilo Kellermann; Christina Regenbogen; Ute Habel; Jessica Freiherr; Natalya Chechko
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 5.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.