There is a need for new molecular-guided contrast agents to enhance surgical procedures such as tumor resection that require a high degree of precision. Cysteine cathepsins are highly up-regulated in a wide variety of cancers, both in tumor cells and in the tumor-supporting cells of the surrounding stroma. Therefore, tools that can be used to dynamically monitor their activity in vivo could be used as imaging contrast agents for intraoperative fluorescence image guided surgery (FGS). Although multiple classes of cathepsin-targeted substrate probes have been reported, most suffer from overall fast clearance from sites of protease activation, leading to reduced signal intensity and duration in vivo. Here we describe the design and synthesis of a series of near-infrared fluorogenic probes that exploit a latent cationic lysosomotropic effect (LLE) to promote cellular retention upon protease activation. These probes show tumor-specific retention, fast activation kinetics, and rapid systemic distribution. We demonstrate that they are suitable for detection of diverse cancer types including breast, colon and lung tumors. Most importantly, the agents are compatible with the existing, FDA approved, da Vinci surgical system for fluorescence guided tumor resection. Therefore, our data suggest that the probes reported here can be used with existing clinical instrumentation to detect tumors and potentially other types of inflammatory lesions to guide surgical decision making in real time.
There is a need for new molecular-guided contrast agents to enhance surgical procedures such as tumor resection that require a high degree of precision. Cysteinecathepsins are highly up-regulated in a wide variety of cancers, both in tumor cells and in the tumor-supporting cells of the surrounding stroma. Therefore, tools that can be used to dynamically monitor their activity in vivo could be used as imaging contrast agents for intraoperative fluorescence image guided surgery (FGS). Although multiple classes of cathepsin-targeted substrate probes have been reported, most suffer from overall fast clearance from sites of protease activation, leading to reduced signal intensity and duration in vivo. Here we describe the design and synthesis of a series of near-infrared fluorogenic probes that exploit a latent cationic lysosomotropic effect (LLE) to promote cellular retention upon protease activation. These probes show tumor-specific retention, fast activation kinetics, and rapid systemic distribution. We demonstrate that they are suitable for detection of diverse cancer types including breast, colon and lung tumors. Most importantly, the agents are compatible with the existing, FDA approved, da Vinci surgical system for fluorescence guided tumor resection. Therefore, our data suggest that the probes reported here can be used with existing clinical instrumentation to detect tumors and potentially other types of inflammatory lesions to guide surgical decision making in real time.
Surgical intervention
is currently the most common treatment for
virtually all types of solid tumors.[1,2] A successful
outcome is therefore contingent upon the complete removal of all cancer
cells from both the affected primary organ and from potential metastatic
sites during surgery.[3] Contrast agents
that target specific biomarkers in cancers can be used as intraoperative
contrast agents to guide surgical resection of solid tumors in order
to improve treatment outcome.[4,5] Among the diverse imaging
modalities, optical-based techniques utilizing fluorescent contrast
agents have great potential.[6,7] Indocyanine green (ICG),
fluorescein, methylene blue, and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) are
all nontargeted contrast agents that are currently used as injectable
enhancers for the visualization of various tumors.[8,9] In
addition, several targeted contrast agents are in various stages of
clinical development.[10] Notably, an FITC
probe that targets folate receptor-α was used in a clinical
trial to demonstrate the value of intraoperative FGS for the treatment
of ovarian cancer.[11] Additionally, other
tumor-targeting agents such as Chlorotoxin-Cy5.5 have been validated
for optical imaging of malignant cancer cells using various mouse
models of cancer. However, its mechanism of tumor selectivity is not
well understood.[12]An alternative
approach to general tumor-targeted contrast agents
is the use of so-called “smart probes” that only produce
or accumulate a signal in tumor tissues when acted upon by an enzyme
activity that is associated with the tumor or surrounding margins.
A common strategy for enzyme-activated smart probe design is to engineer
probes that produce signal when cleaved by a protease. Because proteases
play significant roles in tumor growth and metastasis as well as in
diverse pathologies such as fibrosis, inflammation, osteoporosis,
arthritis, contrast agents that are activated by proteases could prove
valuable for detection and treatment of many diseases.[13,14]A number of probes for tumor imaging applications have targeted
the matrix metallo proteases (MMPs) due to their reported roles in
angiogenesis and tumor growth. This includes both small molecule and
large polymer-based probes[15−17] that produce a signal upon cleavage
as well as masked cell penetrating peptides that accumulate inside
cells when cleaved by an MMP.[18,19] As an alternative to
the MMPs, the cysteinecathepsins are important regulators of various
aspects of tumorigenesis.[20] These proteases
are also highly expressed and activated in many cells that regulate
the intrinsic inflammatory response.[21] In
general, cysteine cathepsin activities are elevated in virtually all
solid tumors due to increased infiltration of immune cells.[22−25] The cysteinecathepsins have therefore been the target of several
tumor-specific imaging agents. These include covalently binding quenched
fluorescence activity-based probes (qABPs),[26−31] a range of high and low molecular weight quenched substrate probes,[32,33] and fluorogenic turn-on substrate probes.[34−36] Although all
of the reported protease-triggered smart probes have proven useful
for imaging of tumor margins in mouse models of cancer,[28,30,31,33,37,38] all have limitations
in terms of overall signal brightness or tumor contrast and none have
been used with clinically approved imaging instrumentation. Therefore,
the optimization of a targeted contrast agent with enhanced contrast
for multiple tumor types and that could be used with existing clinical
instrumentation within the confines of existing surgical workflows
would be transformative to many surgical procedures.In this
study, we report the design and optimization of a cathepsin-targeted
fluorescence contrast agent that exploits a latent lysosomotropic
effect (LLE) to achieve increased signal strength and durability in
solid tumors by inducing probe accumulation in lysosomal compartments
upon cleavage. We find that it is possible to enhance turnover of
the substrate to increase imaging signals by optimizing the linker
in the probe scaffold. The combination of optimized substrate scaffold
and addition of the LLE results in probes suitable for clinical translation
with high signal-to-noise ratios and extended retention in tumor tissues.
Perhaps most importantly, we show that the optimized LLE substrate
probes provide sufficient signal and contrast that they can be used
in existing surgical workflows for real-time imaging of multiple solid
tumor types using the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical,
Sunnyvale, CA; www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/davinci_surgical_system/) that is currently in use in hospitals worldwide.
Results
Design of Cathepsin
Targeted Optical Contrast Agents
As a starting point of probe
design, we used the primary scaffold
of our recently reported[28] potent and selective
qABP (Figure 1a, compound 1) as
a template. We hypothesized that the ability of the substrates to
produce signal without inhibiting the target protease, coupled with
an improved aqueous solubility, would create substrate analogues that
activate faster and produce brighter signal in vivo compared to the original covalent probes. We installed a cleavable
amide bond in place of the irreversible thiol-reactive tetrafluoro-phenoxymethyl
ketone (PMK) electrophile and then examined the effect of varying
the length of the alkyl spacer between the cleavage site and the quenching
group on enzyme turnover. We initially chose three different spacer
lengths, ranging from n = 2, 4 and 6, methylene groups,
representing probes 2CQ (2), 4CQ (3) and 6CQ (4), where the letters C and Q represents the chromophore
and quencher, respectively, and the number indicates the spacer length.
Figure 1
Design
of substrate probes based on an existing quenched fluorescent
activity based probe (qABP). (A) Chemical structure of a recently
reported broad-spectrum cysteine cathepsin qABP (1) and the design
of a set of six substrate analogues by replacement of the phenoxymethyl
ketone (PMK) electrophile with a cleavable amide bond. In the nCQ substrates (2–4; where n spacer
length = 2, 4, 6), the chromophore (C) is attached to the lysine side
chain (R1) and the quenching group (Q) is attached on the
C-terminal side of the cleavable amide bond (R2), whereas
in the nQC substrates (5–7), the location
of each is inverted. (B) Schematic representation of the latent lysosomotropic
effect that results in improved retention of the cleaved fluorescent
products of probe cleavage.
Design
of substrate probes based on an existing quenched fluorescent
activity based probe (qABP). (A) Chemical structure of a recently
reported broad-spectrum cysteine cathepsin qABP (1) and the design
of a set of six substrate analogues by replacement of the phenoxymethyl
ketone (PMK) electrophile with a cleavable amide bond. In the nCQ substrates (2–4; where n spacer
length = 2, 4, 6), the chromophore (C) is attached to the lysine side
chain (R1) and the quenching group (Q) is attached on the
C-terminal side of the cleavable amide bond (R2), whereas
in the nQC substrates (5–7), the location
of each is inverted. (B) Schematic representation of the latent lysosomotropic
effect that results in improved retention of the cleaved fluorescent
products of probe cleavage.In addition to considering the dynamics of enzyme turnover,
one
of the major limitations of substrate-based probes is the rapid diffusion
of the fluorescent fragments after cleavage by the protease. Several
approaches have been developed to increase the signal of noncovalent
imaging agents in tumors. However, all have involved the attachment
of additional moieties (e.g., PEG, lipids, etc.) to alter the properties
of the intact probe, which can lead to increased background and slower
tumor uptake.[33,39] We reasoned that it should be
possible to exploit a latent lysosomotropic effect (LLE) in which
a substrate is cleaved to produce a fluorescent fragment that accumulates
in lysosomes due to protonation of the free amine that is produced
by the proteolytic event.[40] Protonation
of this fragment in lysosomes (pH ∼4–5) reduces the
diffusion rate of the cationic charged intermediate across the lysosomal
membrane.[41] This buildup of the trapped
fluorophore-containing fragment should result in an increase in the
strength, stability, and overall durability of the signal in tumors.
Thus, to take advantage of the LLE, we interchanged the location of
the chromophore (C) and quencher (Q) to generate probes 2QC (5), 4QC (6) and 6QC (7), which produce
free amine-containing fluorescent products upon proteolysis (Figure 1b). Importantly, this design approach does not change
the core structure or size of the probe and the lysosome trapping
effects is only exposed after the cathepsin has activated the internalized
probe in lysosomes.We synthesized all six substrate probes
in good yields using a
combination of solid- and solution-phase chemistries (see Supporting Information Scheme S1). The initial
substrates contained the Cy5 chromophore and sulfo-QSY21 as the quencher.
We first tested the probes for activity in vitro by
monitoring the product curves of each internally quenched probe in
the presence of recombinant cysteinecathepsin L, S, K, B, and V.
All of the quenched substrates (nQC/nCQ, n = 2, 4, 6) were cleaved by cathepsins L, V,
S, and K (Supplementary Figure 1). Importantly,
the cleavage of the substrates was not affected by the orientation
of the chromophore and quencher pair on the substrate, with both nCQ and nQC probes being cleaved at similar
rates (Figure S1). In contrast, there was
a strong correlation between the catalytic/cleavage efficiency (Kcat/KM) and the
length of the alkyl spacer of the substrate, with all cathepsins more
effectively processing the substrates with the longest n = 6 linker (Figure 2A). These differences
in catalytic efficiencies resulted exclusively from differences in
the catalytic rate constants (kcat), as KM values were virtually identical for all substrates
(Figure 2b).
Figure 2
In vitro properties of
the cathepsin probes. (A)
Effect of varying spacer length “n”
on cleavage efficiency (Kcat/KM) of quenched substrates nCQ and nQC
by recombinant cathepsin L. (B) Table of kinetic parameters of the
quenched substrates for recombinant cathepsin L. Data represents an
average of three replicate experiments ± standard error of the
mean. (C) Representative live cell fluorescence microscopy images
of RAW 264.7 cells incubated with 1 μM of quenched substrates
followed by washout. Red is cy5 fluorescence of probes, green is lysotracker
(lysosome selective stain), and blue is Hoechst 33342 (nuclear stain).
Scale bar represents 10 μm.
In vitro properties of
the cathepsin probes. (A)
Effect of varying spacer length “n”
on cleavage efficiency (Kcat/KM) of quenched substrates nCQ and nQC
by recombinant cathepsin L. (B) Table of kinetic parameters of the
quenched substrates for recombinant cathepsin L. Data represents an
average of three replicate experiments ± standard error of the
mean. (C) Representative live cell fluorescence microscopy images
of RAW 264.7 cells incubated with 1 μM of quenched substrates
followed by washout. Red is cy5 fluorescence of probes, green is lysotracker
(lysosome selective stain), and blue is Hoechst 33342 (nuclear stain).
Scale bar represents 10 μm.One hallmark of almost all forms of cancers is the increased
infiltration
of immune cells such as macrophages into the tumor as well as the
surrounding margins.[20,42] Therefore, in order to validate
the LLE hypothesis, we measured probe activation in a macrophage derived
cell line RAW264.7. We observed strong probe fluorescence in cells
incubated with each of the quenched substrates, suggesting that these
probes are indeed activated by lysosomal cysteine proteases in this
macrophage derived cell line (Figure 2c). Labeling
in the live cells was selective to lysosomes as confirmed by the strong
colocalization of the probe with the lysosome specific marker Lysotracker
Red. The similar labeling intensity of the nCQ and nQC probes in live cells suggests that the probes are internalized
at similar rates suggesting that the placement of the fluorophore
does not perturb uptake of the probes.
Noninvasive Optical Imaging
of Solid Tumors
We initially
tested the probes in a syngeneic, orthotopic mouse model of breast
cancer. In this model, 4T1 cells are inoculated into the number 1
and 10 mammary fat pad of mice to generate tumors. In order to determine
the impact of the LLE, we directly compared imaging signals of lysosomotropic
probes 2QC (5) and 6QC (7) to that of the
nonlysosomotropic analogues 2CQ (2) and 6CQ (4). We intravenously administered probes to tumor-bearing mice
and then performed noninvasive imaging at various time points post
probe injection. We observed rapid accumulation of Cy5 fluorescence
from activation of the probes in and around the tumors in less than
30 min with sufficient contrast demarcating tumor from the surrounding
normal tissues within 1 h (Figure 3a). The
intensity of the fluorescent signal reached a maximum at 4 h after
administration, followed by retained high signals for 24 h (Figure 3b). Importantly, the overall absolute fluorescence
intensity in the tumors was higher and brighter for mice treated with
the LLE substrates 2QC and 6QC compared to the nonlysosomotropic analogs
2CQ and 6CQ. Furthermore, the intensity of the signal remained constant
over a period of 24 h in the tumors of mice administered with the
LLE substrates, whereas the signals from the non-LLE substrates substantially
reduced after 24 h (Figure 3a, b). A similar
trend was observed by ex vivo imaging of the excised
tumors at 4 h and at the end of the 24 h period (Figure 3c).
Figure 3
In vivo properties of the cathepsin substrate
probes. (A) Time course of noninvasive fluorescence imaging of tumor-associated
cysteine cathepsins in mice injected with substrates CQ/QC (n = 2, 6).
Representative images are shown for 0.5, 1, 4, 8, and 24 h time points.
(B) Comparison of tumor-labeling kinetics of the nonlysosomotropic
probes CQ and the lysosomotropic QC substrates over a period of
24 h. (Error bars represent the standard deviation on the mean of N ≥ 3 mice. A control mouse without probe was used
to correct for autofluorescence). (C) Ex vivo images
of tumors at 4 h and at 24 h post injection of the two types of substrates.
Error represent the standard deviation of the mean for N ≥ 3 mice.
In vivo properties of the cathepsin substrate
probes. (A) Time course of noninvasive fluorescence imaging of tumor-associated
cysteinecathepsins in mice injected with substrates CQ/QC (n = 2, 6).
Representative images are shown for 0.5, 1, 4, 8, and 24 h time points.
(B) Comparison of tumor-labeling kinetics of the nonlysosomotropic
probes CQ and the lysosomotropic QC substrates over a period of
24 h. (Error bars represent the standard deviation on the mean of N ≥ 3 mice. A control mouse without probe was used
to correct for autofluorescence). (C) Ex vivo images
of tumors at 4 h and at 24 h post injection of the two types of substrates.
Error represent the standard deviation of the mean for N ≥ 3 mice.In order to determine
if the LLE probes demonstrate specific accumulation
in tumor tissues relative to the non-LLE and definitively confirm
this mechanism of accumulation, we performed fluorescence microscopy
analysis on isolated tumor tissues from mice treated with the probes.
This also allowed us to determine which populations of cells are responsible
for activating the quenched substrate probes in vivo. Importantly, this immunofluorescence staining showed that the probe
signal was found exclusively in CD68-positive cells (macrophages)
and was only visible for the LLE probes (2QC and 6QC), when tissues
were analyzed by histology 24 h post probe injection (Figure 4a). Further analysis of various organs from the
4 h and 24 h time points showed that most organs take up the probes.
However, the strongest accumulation of the probe was observed in the
kidneys and the tumor, suggesting that they are eliminated mainly
by renal clearance (Figure 4b). Together, these
results confirm that the LLE leads to enhanced probe retention in
tumors as the result of lysosomal retention of the fluorescent products
of the probe.
Figure 4
Analysis of cellular localization of activated substrates
in tumor
tissues (A) Immunohistology of frozen sections of tumors excised from
mice injected with substrates CQ and QC at the
24 h time point. Red is the Cy5 fluorescence of probes, green is CD68
(macrophage marker), and blue is DAPI (nuclear stain). Scale bar represents
10 μm. (B) Biodistribution of probes in various organs after
4 and 24 h following intravenous administration of the indicated probes.
Errors represent the standard deviation of the mean for N ≥ 3 for each time point.
Analysis of cellular localization of activated substrates
in tumor
tissues (A) Immunohistology of frozen sections of tumors excised from
mice injected with substrates CQ and QC at the
24 h time point. Red is the Cy5 fluorescence of probes, green is CD68
(macrophage marker), and blue is DAPI (nuclear stain). Scale bar represents
10 μm. (B) Biodistribution of probes in various organs after
4 and 24 h following intravenous administration of the indicated probes.
Errors represent the standard deviation of the mean for N ≥ 3 for each time point.
Application of Probes in FGS Using the da Vinci Surgical System
The da Vinci Surgical System[43] is one
example of a clinically approved instrument for minimally invasive
surgical procedures. Most da Vinci procedures are performed using
white light illumination with no contrast to guide the surgeon in
real time. We therefore set out to test our optimized substrate probes
using the da Vinci system employing the same workflows that are used
in the clinic. In order to achieve a real-time intraoperative imaging
capability, we synthesized our probes containing a near-infrared (NIR)
fluorophore DyLight780-B1 and corresponding QC-1 NIR quencher (6CQNIR (8) and 6QCNIR (9)) so that they would
be compatible with the existing camera of the da Vinci system (Figure 5a; Supplemental Scheme 2). Prior to application with the da Vinci system, we validated the
probes in the 4T1 breast cancer model described above using the IVIS-spectrum
small animal imaging system. Following systemic administration of
the NIR cathepsin-targeted contrast agents, we imaged mice noninvasively
every hour for 4 h, and then at 6, 8, 12, and 24 h. As observed for
the Cy5 labeled probes, we observed a rapid accumulation of the probe
signal in and around the breast tumors, with substantial contrast
demarcating the tumor margin from healthy surrounding tissues as early
as 1 h post injection (Figure 5b). The intensity
of the fluorescence signal in the tumors increased rapidly in mice
injected with both types of probes, which eventually peaked between
4 and 6 h. Similar to the initial Cy5 substrates, the NIR analogues
showed the LLE as evidenced by the increased signals of the LLE probe
in tumors in live animals (Figure 5b,c) and
after ex vivo analysis of tumors (Figure 5d). Signal intensity was similar for both probes
at the 1 and 4 h time points, suggesting equal rates of diffusion
into tissues as well as similar activation rates. However, the LLE
probes showed brighter signals and longer retention in tumors starting
at 6 h after injection (Figure 5c). Interestingly,
the LLE in the NIR substrates was a somewhat weaker effect relative
to the Cy5 substrates, likely due to the extra cationic charge on
the benzopyrillium ring on the Dylight 780-B1 dye (Figure 5a). This charge confers some degree of lysosomotropism
to the uncleaved substrates and thus reducing the overall relative
enhancement of retention as the result of cleavage by a protease.
Similar to the Cy5 probes, these NIR analogues were eliminated by
renal clearance as we observed highest signal accumulation in the
kidneys and tumors (Figure 5e).
Figure 5
Evaluation of in vivo properties of optimized
NIR probes. (A) Chemical structures of the near-infrared quenched
lysosomotropic substrate 6CQNIR (8) and nonlysosomotropic
analogue 6QCNIR (9). (B) Time course of noninvasive fluorescence
imaging of tumor associated cysteine cathepsins in the 4T1 breast
cancer mouse model using the NIR probes. (C) Quantification of tumor-labeling
kinetics of 6CQNIR and 6QCNIR over the 24-h time course. N ≥ 3 mice for each probe. Error bars represent the standard
deviation on the mean. (D) Ex vivo images comparing
tumors isolated from mice that received the LLE (9) and non-LLE (8)
substrates at the 24 h time point. (E) Biodistribution of probes in
various organs and tumors 24 h after injection.
Evaluation of in vivo properties of optimized
NIR probes. (A) Chemical structures of the near-infrared quenched
lysosomotropic substrate 6CQNIR (8) and nonlysosomotropic
analogue 6QCNIR (9). (B) Time course of noninvasive fluorescence
imaging of tumor associated cysteinecathepsins in the 4T1 breast
cancermouse model using the NIR probes. (C) Quantification of tumor-labeling
kinetics of 6CQNIR and 6QCNIR over the 24-h time course. N ≥ 3 mice for each probe. Error bars represent the standard
deviation on the mean. (D) Ex vivo images comparing
tumors isolated from mice that received the LLE (9) and non-LLE (8)
substrates at the 24 h time point. (E) Biodistribution of probes in
various organs and tumors 24 h after injection.We next applied the probes directly in intraoperative fluorescence
image guided surgery using the da Vinci system (Figure 6a). For these studies, we focused on the 6QCNIR probe because
it had the brightest signal and the longest tumor retention. In order
to demonstrate that the probe can be employed as a common targeted
contrast reagent for FGS of diverse tumors, we performed validation
studies in three mouse models of cancer. These studies included the
4T1 breast cancer transplant model as well as two spontaneous cancer
models of lung and colon cancer (Kras/p53 driven lung cancer model[44] and APCmin+ colorectal adenoma model[45]).
Figure 6
Intraoperative fluorescence image guided detection
and resection
of colorectal, breast, and lung tumors using the da Vinci Surgical
System. (A) Image of the da Vinci Surgical System. (B) Detection and
fluorescent image guided surgical removal of mouse breast tumors (4T1)
using the da Vinci instrument 6 h after I.V. treatment with contrast
agent 6QCNIR. The image is a screen capture from Movie S1 showing white light illumination of tumor and tumor
bed (left), as well as corresponding fluorescence image detected using
the Firefly camera system on the da Vinci instrument (center). Tissue
histology of the resected region (dashed lines) as assessed by H&E
stain is shown at right. (C) Detection of polyps in the colon of colorectal
cancer APCmin+ mouse model 6 h after I.V. administration
of 6QCNIR. Images are screenshots from Movie S2. The panels show representative images of polyps detected by white
light illumination of tumors (left) and subsequent fluorescence imaging
using the Firefly camera (center). Tissue histology of the resected
regions (dotted lines) as assessed by H&E stain is shown at right.
The white dashed box shows a general region of normal tissue used
for histology. (D) Images of mice bearing lung adenocarcinomas in
the KrasLSL-G12D/+; p53; R26LSL-tdTomato/+ (KPT) mouse model 6 h after I.V. administration of the 6CQNIR probe.
Images were take from Movie S3 as in B
and C and tissues analyzed by H&E staining of tissue slices taken
from the tissues in the regions shown (dashed lines). The white dashed
box shows a general region showing increased fluorescence that was
confirmed by histology to be cancerous. Scale bars for all H&E
images are 100 μM.
Intraoperative fluorescence image guided detection
and resection
of colorectal, breast, and lung tumors using the da Vinci Surgical
System. (A) Image of the da Vinci Surgical System. (B) Detection and
fluorescent image guided surgical removal of mousebreast tumors (4T1)
using the da Vinci instrument 6 h after I.V. treatment with contrast
agent 6QCNIR. The image is a screen capture from Movie S1 showing white light illumination of tumor and tumor
bed (left), as well as corresponding fluorescence image detected using
the Firefly camera system on the da Vinci instrument (center). Tissue
histology of the resected region (dashed lines) as assessed by H&E
stain is shown at right. (C) Detection of polyps in the colon of colorectal
cancer APCmin+ mouse model 6 h after I.V. administration
of 6QCNIR. Images are screenshots from Movie S2. The panels show representative images of polyps detected by white
light illumination of tumors (left) and subsequent fluorescence imaging
using the Firefly camera (center). Tissue histology of the resected
regions (dotted lines) as assessed by H&E stain is shown at right.
The white dashed box shows a general region of normal tissue used
for histology. (D) Images of mice bearing lung adenocarcinomas in
the KrasLSL-G12D/+; p53; R26LSL-tdTomato/+ (KPT) mouse model 6 h after I.V. administration of the 6CQNIR probe.
Images were take from Movie S3 as in B
and C and tissues analyzed by H&E staining of tissue slices taken
from the tissues in the regions shown (dashed lines). The white dashed
box shows a general region showing increased fluorescence that was
confirmed by histology to be cancerous. Scale bars for all H&E
images are 100 μM.We initially performed the da Vinci surgery on mice containing
4T1 implanted breast tumors at 6 h after administration of the LLE
probe (Supplementary Movie S1). Using real-time
intraoperative fluorescence imaging, we were able to clearly detect
strong probe signal in tumors relative to surrounding tissue (Figure 6b). After surgical removal of the primary tumor,
the fluorescent contrast allowed detection of secondary tumors, buried
deep in the tumor bed (Supplementary Movie S1, starting at 0:55). As expected, these secondary tumors could not
be distinguished from the normal surrounding tissues under white light,
but we could resect them intraoperatively when guided by the probe
signal. Analyses of resected probe positive tissues (including the
secondary tumors) by histology using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
staining confirmed that they were all indeed cancerous tissues (Figure 6b).As a second model to test the probes,
we performed a direct FGS
imaging study using the APCmin/+ model. This model is an
ideal choice as it mimics humancolon cancer with tumors forming spontaneously
in the colon. For this model, we performed surgery using the da Vinci
system to remove the colon. We then flushed, splayed open, and imaged
the colon with the wide field camera of the da Vinci under both white
light and NIR illumination (Supplementary Movie
S2). In fluorescence mode, we were able to unambiguously identify,
in real time, multiple intestinal polyps with various morphologies
along the entire length of the colon. The probe labeled the malignant
polyps with high signal intensity and with good contrast demarcating
the tumor from the surrounding healthy colon. In addition to the intestinal
adenomas, we observed some signal in the mucosal colonic patches,
suggesting cathepsin activity. We removed the probe-positive polyps
using intraoperative real-time fluorescence imaging to ensure complete
resection of the tumors from the tumor beds (real-time video is shown
in Movie S2). Subsequent analysis of the
resected tumor tissues by H&E staining confirmed that all the
probe positive polyps were indeed tumors (Figure 6c) with the exception of a few small foci that were found
to be colonic patches. No signal increase above background was observed
in the colon of control healthy mice administered with the same dose
of the contrast agent, confirming that the activation of the probe
is due to the high levels and activity of cathepsins in tumors.As a final test of the overall broad applicability of the contrast
agent, we performed imaging studies in a lung adenocarcinomamouse
model in the KrasLSL-G12D/+; p53; R26LSL-tdTomato/+ (KPT) mouse model of adenocarcinoma[46] in which lung tumors are induced in mice by
intratracheal infection with lentiviral delivering Cre recombinase.[44] As performed for the other two models, we intravenously
treated mice with the 6QCNIR probe 6 h prior to FGS. We opened the
chest cavity prior to the surgery and were able to detect lung adenomas
intraoperatively using real-time fluorescence imaging on the da Vinci
system (Supplemental Movie S3). We were
able to detect tumors in the lungs with high contrast differentiating
tumor from normal lung tissues (Figure 6d).
Furthermore, we observed small secondary regions of probe signal that
were not visible by white light imaging. All of the probe positive
tissues were removed from the lungs and confirmed to be tumor-derived
by histology. Control mice injected with the same dose of the contrast
agent showed only background fluorescence, consistent with low levels
of cathepsin activity in the lung tissues.
Discussion
Laparoscopic
surgery, also known as minimally invasive surgery,
is becoming popular for removing various solid tumors due to faster
recovery time, reduced blood loss, pain, and rates of infection. The
da Vinci Surgical System produced by Intuitive Surgical (Sunnyvale,
CA) is one example of a clinically approved surgical system that is
in use in hospitals around the world for robotic-assisted resection
of various kinds of tumors.[47] Surgical
resection is currently the most common form of treatment for most
types of solid tumors. In order to improve treatment outcomes and
minimize subsequent future recurrence, it is critical to remove all
the cancerous tissues from the affected organ.[48] Targeted fluorescence contrast agents capable of distinguishing
between cancerous and normal tissues have the potential to guide intraoperative,
real-time decision-making and thereby improved the outcomes of surgical
treatments. In spite of these advantages, there are currently no FDA
approved molecular targeted optical contrast agents. Current resections
of tumor are therefore performed without any additional contrast to
demarcate the margins of tumors.In this report, we have developed
a cathepsin-targeted, tumor-selective
substrate probe 6QCNIR (9) that is compatible with existing clinical
instrumentation for use in fluorescence image guided surgery. In the
process of optimizing the cathepsin targeted probes to improve in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacological properties,
we exploited a latent lysosomotropic effect (LLE). This strategy allowed
us to enhance the signal intensity and increase the signal to background
ratio of the probes by trapping the released fluorophore in lysosomes
once cleaved by a protease. The use of cleavable substrate probes
in noninvasive imaging is often hindered by poor signal to background
as the result of fast diffusion of the activated fluorophore from
the tumor site to the surrounding tissues. In theory, quenched fluorogenic
substrates should be advantageous due to signal amplification as the
result of substrate turnover by the protease. However, rapid renal
clearance of the products reduces signal at a rate that is fast enough
to mitigate this advantage.[49,50] As a result, several
approaches have been employed to stabilize the signal in the tumor
milieu. Examples of such approaches include the conjugation of high
molecular weight polyethylene glycol (PEG) linkers to the substrate
to increase circulation and slow clearance,[39] and lipidation by conjugation of palmitate to increase membrane
retention.[33] However, both of these approaches
result in significant changes to the size and properties of the uncleaved
probes, thus leading to reduced tumor uptake and higher background
in normal tissues. Our strategy exploiting the LLE does not modify
the substrate because it requires no introduction of additional structural
components, and furthermore, the increased retention is only observed
in the cleaved product.In support of the value of the LLE probes
for FGS, we found that
the probes provided optimal contrast in diverse tumor types. In the
4T1 breast cancer model, rapid accumulation of the activated probe
could be observed in the tumor with sufficient contrast to differentiate
the tumor from normal surrounding tissues in less than 1 h after administration.
The signal in the tumors of the group of mice that received the LLE
probe persisted in the tumor area for more than 24 h. In addition,
the overall absolute fluorescent intensity and contrast was higher
compared to the non-LLE substrates. In the APCmin+ colorectal
cancer model, the cathepsin targeted probe was able to detect all
adenomas present in the colon, including early lesions that were relatively
flat, akin to those often difficult to detect using current endoscopic
methods. H&E staining of the polyps showed that the probe detected
adenomas with very high efficiency. This suggests that, when coupled
with conventional methods of colonoscopy (which is currently carried
out only under white light), the reported probes can enhance the detection
of polyps at various stages and sizes, and hence improve the outcome
of screening and treatment of colorectal cancer.We believe
that the cathepsin targeted probes presented here can
be broadly used to image solid tumors of diverse origins, due to the
fact that cathepins are overexpressed in virtually all cancer types.
Furthermore, because increased cathepsin activity is associated with
inflammation in conditions such as atherosclerosis, asthma, stroke,
and sepsis, these probes have the potential to be used for detection
and treatment of many other conditions. Most importantly, our data
suggest that this probe can be used as a targeted contrast agent in
FGS in conjunction with an FDA approved clinical instrument that is
currently in use in hospitals worldwide.
Materials and Methods
Compound
Synthesis
All reagents and materials used
in the synthesis of the noncovalent fluorescently quenched cysteine
cathepsin targeted contrast agents were obtained from commercial sources
and were used without additional purification. Cy5-NHS ester and QSY21-sulfo-NHS
ester were synthesized using reported procedures. DyLight 780-B1-NHS
ester was obtained from Pierce (Thermo Scientific, Cat. No. 53064),
and IRDye QC-1 NHS ester (near-infrared quencher) was purchased from
LI-COR Bioscience (Lincoln, Nebraska). Compounds were synthesized
by a combination of solid and solution phase synthesis, followed by
purification of the final products by reverse phase preparative HPLC.
Detailed synthetic procedures including compound characterization
are given in the Supporting Information.
In Vitro Enzyme Kinetics with Quenched Substrates
Recombinant
cysteinecathepsins (including Cat. L, B, S, V, and K) were obtained
commercially. The concentration of the enzymes used in the kinetic
assay were first confirmed by active site titration using the irreversible
inhibitor ZFK-Chloromethyl ketone and the commercial substrates Z-VVR-AMC
for cathepsns, S, L, B, and V, or Z-KR-AMC for cathepsin K. Initial
screening of the synthesized substrate for activity against the different
cathepsins was performed by the incubation of a fixed concentration
of each probe with the protease dissolve in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH
= 5.5, 5 mM DTT, 0.1% triton X, 0.5% CHAPS) at 37 °C in a black
opaque 96-well plate. Turnover curves were followed by measuring the
increase in Cy5 fluorescence (640/670 nm) using a Biotek plated reader.
For the measurement of kinetic parameters, an equal concentration
of each enzyme (final concentrations of 5 nM) was incubated with each
of the different types of quenched substrate. The rates of increase
in Cy5 fluorescence (which is indicative of probe cleavage by cathepsins)
were measured for each concentration (a serial dilution starting from
a final concentration of 10 μM to 0 μM in triplicate)
of quenched substrate from the linear portion of the turnover curves.
The kinetic parameters (Km, Kcat and Km/Kcat) were obtained by fitting the experimental data to
the Michaelis Menten equation using GraphPad Prism software.
Live Cell
Imaging
RAW246.7 cells were seeded in a 35
× 10 mm glass bottom tissue culture dish at a density of approximately
1 × 104 cells 24 h prior to labeling. The medium (Dulbecco’s
Modified Eagle’s medium, DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum, and 100 units/ml % penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin)
was replaced with 1 mL DMEM containing 1 μM of the indicated
quenhced probe and incubated for 30 min in a humidified at 37 °C
with 5% CO2 atmosphere. After washing (1×) with PBS,
the cells were incubated with fresh media containing 60 nM Lysotracker
for 30 min followed by another wash with PBS. Subsequently, 5 μg/mL
of Hoechst 33342 in DMEM was added and incubated for an additional
10 min. The cells were then washed (3×) with PBS and then covered
with a layer of PBS for microscopy. Images were aquired using a 60×
objective on Zeiss Axiovert 200 M confocal microscope using the filters
for Cy5, Hoechst, and Lysotracker Red. Images were processed using
ImageJ.
Animal Models
All animal care and experimentation was
conducted in accordance with current National Institutes of Health
and Stanford University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
guidelines.
Breast Cancer
4T1 cells were implanted into the mammary
fat pad of 6–8 weeks old female BALB/c mice (The Jackson Laboratory,
Bar Harbor, ME). Twenty-four hours before implantation, the hair on
the region of interest was removed using “Nair lotion”.
A total volume of 100 μL of 1 × 106 4T1 cells
(ATCC) in PBS was injected into mammary fat pad number 1 and 10 while
the mice were under isoflurane anesthesia. Tumor growths were monitored
for approximately 14 days. Twenty nanomolar (200 uM) of the indicated
compound dissolved in a solution containing 20% or 10% DMSO in PBS
was administered via tail vein. After injection, mice were imaged
noninvasively at the indicated time points using either the IVIS 100
or IVIS-Spectrum systems (Xenogen). For the Cy5-containing compounds,
the signal was detected with a Cy5.5 filter set, whereas the near-infrared
dye was detected using 710 and 820 nm excitation and emission filters,
respectively. Analyses of the images collected were performed with
the Living Image software (PerkinElmer). After the last time point,
the mice were anesthetized with isofluorane and sacrificed by cervical
dislocation. Tumors and various organs were isolated by dissection
and imaged ex vivo to measure the biodistribution profiles of the
probes.
Colorectal Cancer
APCmin/+ on the C57BL/6
background were originally obtained from Jackson and maintained in
a specific pathogen-free facility.
Lung Adenocarcinoma Mouse
The generation and intratracheal
infection of KrasLSL-G12D/+; p53; R26LSL-tdTomato/+ (KPT) mice were as previously described
in.[44,46] Briefly, 6 week old KPT mice were intratracheally
infected with 4 × 103 Lenti-Cre virus and imaged/sacrificed
8 months postinfection. Noninfected age and sex-matched mice were
used as controls.
Histology and Immunofluorescence
The resected tumors
and control tissues were incubated in a 4% PFA solution in PBS for
6 h followed by an overnight incubation in a 30% sucrose solution.
The fixed tissues were embedded and then frozen in OCT medium. Five
micromolar sections were obtained on a glass slide and then fixed
in acetone, blocked with PNB blocking buffer and incubated overnight
with the macrophage marker rat antimouse CD68 (1:1000 AbD serotec
Cat. No. MCA1957). Next, the tissues were incubated with the secondary
antibody goat-anti rat conjugated with AlexaFluor-488 (1:500; Invitrogen)
for 1 h at RT. Sections were then stained with DAPI (2 μg/mL;
Invitrogen) for 5 min and then mounted in ProLong Gold Mounting Medium
(Invitrogen). The sections were imaged at 40× using a Zeiss Axiovert
200 M confocal microscope in Cy5, FITC and DAPI channels. Isolated
tumor tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and then embedded
in paraffin for sectioning. H&E staining was performed on the
sectioned tissues as reported in the literature.
Intraopereative
Fluorescence Guided Surgery with the da Vinci
Surgical System
Breast Tumors (4T1)
Tumor-bearing
and control mice
were administered the indicated probe intravenously (20 nmol in a
solution of PBS with 10% DMSO) 6 h prior to surgery. A few minutes
before surgery, mice were anaesthetized and euthanized by cervical
dislocation and then mounted onto the surgical table. Surgery was
performed using the da Vinci Surgical which is equipped with a CCD
camera with near-infrared fluorescence imaging capability. Breast
tumors were detected by fluorescence illumination and the solid tumors
were removed using a combination of white and fluorescence light as
a guide to confirm complete tumor resection. After removal of primary
tumor the tumor bed was illuminated by near-infrared fluorescence
to detect and remove residual or secondary malignant tissue. Real-time
videos of the surgical procedures are shown in supplementary results (Movie S1). The tumors identified by
the probe fluorescence were removed for further analyses by histology
in order to confirm malignancy.
Colorectal Tumors
Apc mice were placed on a low fluorescence
chow 72 h prior to surgery and then fasted for 12 h before surgery.
100 μL of 20 nmol of the indicated probe in PBS containing 10%
DMSO was intravenously administered 6 h prior to surgery. Mice were
then euthanized while under isoflurane anesthesia and then mounted
onto the surgical table for FGS. The whole colon was observed for
the presence of tumors using fluorescence. The colon portion of the
intestine was then completely removed from the mouse, flushed with
PBS to remove fecal matter, and then splayed open. Colonic polyps
identified by fluorescence illumination of the splayed colon were
subjected to histological analyses for positive confirmation of adenoma.
Real-time videos of the surgical procedure of the FGS using the da
Vinci system are shown in the supplementary results (Movie S2).
Lung Tumors
Tumor and control mice
were administered
intravenously with the indicated probe (20 nmol dissolved in PBS with
10% DMSO) 6 h before surgery. Mice were then euthanized while under
isoflurane anesthesia and subsequently placed on the surgical table.
The lung cavity was opened using the microforcep and scissor tools
of the da Vinci system. Fluorescence illumination was used to detect
the tumor margins and secondary tumors, which were excised and analyzed
by histology for positive confirmation of malignancy. Real-time videos
of the FGS procedures are shown in the supplementary
results (Movie S3).
Authors: Galia Blum; Stefanie R Mullins; Kinneret Keren; Marko Fonovic; Christopher Jedeszko; Mark J Rice; Bonnie F Sloane; Matthew Bogyo Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2005-08-14 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Tao Jiang; Emilia S Olson; Quyen T Nguyen; Melinda Roy; Patricia A Jennings; Roger Y Tsien Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Vasilena Gocheva; Hao-Wei Wang; Bedrick B Gadea; Tanaya Shree; Karen E Hunter; Alfred L Garfall; Tara Berman; Johanna A Joyce Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Morshed A Chowdhury; Ignace A Moya; Shardul Bhilocha; Cody C McMillan; Brady G Vigliarolo; Ingeborg Zehbe; Christopher P Phenix Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Allison S Cohen; Renata Patek; Steven A Enkemann; Joseph O Johnson; Tingan Chen; Eric Toloza; Josef Vagner; David L Morse Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Ethan Walker; Yiqiao Liu; InYoung Kim; David L Wilson; James P Basilion; Daniel L Popkin; Mark Biro; Sukanya Raj Iyer; Harib Ezaldein; Jeffrey Scott; Miesha Merati; Rachel Mistur; Bo Zhou; Brian Straight; Joshua J Yim; Matthew Bogyo; Margaret Mann Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Yiqiao Liu; Ethan Walker; Sukanya Raj Iyer; Mark Biro; InYoung Kim; Bo Zhou; Brian Straight; Matthew Bogyo; James P Basilion; Daniel L Popkin; David L Wilson Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2019-03-18
Authors: Jessica L Klockow; Kenneth S Hettie; Edward L LaGory; Eui Jung Moon; Amato J Giaccia; Edward E Graves; Frederick T Chin Journal: Sens Actuators B Chem Date: 2019-11-30 Impact factor: 7.460