| Literature DB >> 26035248 |
Cuong D Tran1,2, Geetha L Gopalsamy3,4, Elissa K Mortimer5, Graeme P Young6.
Abstract
It is well recognised that zinc deficiency is a major global public health issue, particularly in young children in low-income countries with diarrhoea and environmental enteropathy. Zinc supplementation is regarded as a powerful tool to correct zinc deficiency as well as to treat a variety of physiologic and pathologic conditions. However, the dose and frequency of its use as well as the choice of zinc salt are not clearly defined regardless of whether it is used to treat a disease or correct a nutritional deficiency. We discuss the application of zinc stable isotope tracer techniques to assess zinc physiology, metabolism and homeostasis and how these can address knowledge gaps in zinc supplementation pharmacokinetics. This may help to resolve optimal dose, frequency, length of administration, timing of delivery to food intake and choice of zinc compound. It appears that long-term preventive supplementation can be administered much less frequently than daily but more research needs to be undertaken to better understand how best to intervene with zinc in children at risk of zinc deficiency. Stable isotope techniques, linked with saturation response and compartmental modelling, also have the potential to assist in the continued search for simple markers of zinc status in health, malnutrition and disease.Entities:
Keywords: child health; diarrhoea; global health; kinetics; modelling; stable isotope; zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26035248 PMCID: PMC4488783 DOI: 10.3390/nu7064271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1The individual measurements of absorbed Zn (AZ) vs ingested Zn (IZ), one time doses given in the post-absorptive state, and the fitted Hill Equation model (thick solid line). The model predicts the absorption, approaching the Amax value of 13 mg (dashed line). The Hill equation model is represented by the following equation; where the parameters A, IA, and H are the maximum absorbed Zn, the ingested Zn (IZ) that results in absorbed Zn (AZ) of 50% of A, and the Hill (or sigmoidicity) coefficient, respectively.
Figure 2The absorbed zinc (AZ) in adults in the post-absorptive state after ingestion of a 20 mg zinc oral dose (IZ) for 1, 2 and 6 consecutive days (A); The AZ in adults in the post-absorptive state after ingestion of a 20 mg zinc oral dose 6 days apart (B).
Summary of studies that utilise the zinc stable dual isotope tracer ratio (DITR) technique to assess fractional absorption of zinc (FAZ), absorbed zinc (AZ), total absorbed zinc (TAZ), endogenous faecal zinc (EFZ) and exchangeable zinc pools (EZP) in children in low-income countries.
| Reference | Context | Zinc Intake | Zinc Status Parameters Using DITR Technique | Key Findings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAZ/AZ/TAZ | EZP | EFZ | ||||
| Ariff | Pakistan; healthy breastfed infants (6 months) | 10 mg/day for 6 month | √ | √ | ↑ AZ, EZP | |
| Esami | Kenya; healthy breastfed infants (9 months) | 5 mg/day for 3 month | √ | ↔ AZ | ||
| Hambidge | Guatemala; healthy children (8.9 ±1.3 years) | low-, isohybrid- and control-phyate maize | √ | ↔ EFZ | ||
| Herman | Indonesia; healthy children (4–8 years) | fortified flour meal 60 mg Zn/kg (as ZnO or ZnSO4) | √ | ↔ AZ between ZnO or ZnSO4 | ||
| Hettiarachchi | Sri Lanka; healthy children (7–10 years) | fortified rice flour 60 mg/kg (ZnO) for 2 weeks | √ | addition of Na2EDTA improve zinc absorption | ||
| Hettiarachchi | Sri Lanka; healthy children (4–7 years) | meal 1.5 mg Zn (ZnSO4) | √ | ↔ AZ | ||
| Islam | Bangladesh; healthy non breastfed children (36–59 months) | high-zinc rice (HZnR), conventional rice (CR), or CR+zinc for 1 day | √ | ↔ TAZ between CR and HZnR | ||
| Kennedy | Malawi; healthy children (2–5 years) | maize high-phytate or maize reduced-phytate diets for 40 days | √ | ↔ EZP | ||
| Kodkany | India; healthy children (22–35 months) | zinc-rich dry pearl millet flour for 1 day | √ | zinc biofortified pearl millet adequately meet the physiological requirements | ||
| Li | China; healthy children (13 ± 1.1 years) | 3 mg Zn for 10 days +NaFeEDTA-fortified soy sauce | √ | ↔ FAZ | ||
| Lopez de Romana | Peru; children at risk of zinc deficiency (3–4 years) | 0, 3, 9 mg Zn/100 g flour for 7 weeks | √ | ↔ AZ before and after | ||
| Manary | Malawi; children with tropical enteropathy (3–5 years) | habitual diet | √ | √ | ↑ EFZ compared to healthy | |
| Manary | Malawi; healthy children (2–5 years) | maize-based diet + 1.5–2 mg Zn for 1 day | √ | √ | ↑ EFZ compared to previous studies | |
| Manary | Malawi; children hospitalised for tuberculosis (3–13 years) | corn+soy porridge (low or high phytate) for 3–7 days | √ | √ | low phytate ↑ FAZ, TAZ | |
| Mazariegos | Guatemala; healthy children (6–11 years) | low-phytate, isohybrid wild-type or a local maize for 10 weeks | √ | ↔ FAZ, TAZ | ||
| Nair | India; healthy adolescent (13–15 years) | standardized rice meal or the same meal with 100 g of guava fruit (2.7 mg Zn) for 2 days | √ | ↔ FAZ | ||
| Sheng | China; healthy children (19–25 months) | habitual diet | √ | √ | mean intake and absorption of zinc are low compared to average dietary requirements | |
| Zlotkin | Ghana; healthy children (12–24 months) | 5 or 10 mg Zn for 14 days | √ | ↑ TAZ for high zinc | ||