Literature DB >> 26032715

The evolution of sexually antagonistic phenotypes.

Jennifer C Perry1, Locke Rowe2.   

Abstract

Sexual conflict occurs whenever there is sexually antagonistic selection on shared traits. When shared traits result from interactions (e.g., mating rate) and have a different genetic basis in each sex (i.e., interlocus conflict), then sex-specific traits that shift the value of these interaction traits toward the sex-specific optimum will be favored. Male traits can be favored that increase the fitness of their male bearers, but decrease the fitness of interacting females. Likewise, female traits that reduce the costs of interacting with harmful males may simultaneously impose costs on males. If the evolution of these antagonistic traits changes the nature of selection acting on the opposite sex, interesting coevolutionary dynamics will result. Here we examine three current issues in the study of sexually antagonistic interactions: the female side of sexual conflict, the ecological context of sexual conflict, and the strength of evidence for sexually antagonistic coevolution.
Copyright © 2015 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26032715      PMCID: PMC4448611          DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol        ISSN: 1943-0264            Impact factor:   10.005


  97 in total

1.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Sexual selection and the evolution of genital shape and complexity in water striders.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Population structure mediates sexual conflict in water striders.

Authors:  Omar Tonsi Eldakar; Michael J Dlugos; John W Pepper; David Sloan Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  On anisogamy and the evolution of 'sex roles'.

Authors:  Malin Ah-King
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Sexual conflict in hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Lukas Schärer; Tim Janicke; Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius.

Authors:  A D Stutt; M T Siva-Jothy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The seminal symphony: how to compose an ejaculate.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Laura Sirot; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 9.  Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females.

Authors:  Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Female genitalia concealment promotes intimate male courtship in a water strider.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Piotr G Jablonski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Sexual conflict and intrasexual polymorphism promote assortative mating and halt population differentiation.

Authors:  Lars Lønsmann Iversen; Erik I Svensson; Søren Thromsholdt Christensen; Johannes Bergsten; Kaj Sand-Jensen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Li; Luke Holman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Sexual cannibalism as a manifestation of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Male coercion and female injury in a sexually cannibalistic mantis.

Authors:  Nathan W Burke; Gregory I Holwell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.

Authors:  Ben R Hopkins; Jennifer C Perry
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-06

6.  Rapid Gene Family Evolution of a Nematode Sperm Protein Despite Sequence Hyper-conservation.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Sex ratio and the evolution of aggression in fruit flies.

Authors:  Eleanor Bath; Danielle Edmunds; Jessica Norman; Charlotte Atkins; Lucy Harper; Wayne G Rostant; Tracey Chapman; Stuart Wigby; Jennifer C Perry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Differences in Postmating Transcriptional Responses between Conspecific and Heterospecific Matings in Drosophila.

Authors:  Yasir H Ahmed-Braimah; Mariana F Wolfner; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  A neo-W chromosome in a tropical butterfly links colour pattern, male-killing, and speciation.

Authors:  David A S Smith; Ian J Gordon; Walther Traut; Jeremy Herren; Steve Collins; Dino J Martins; Kennedy Saitoti; Piera Ireri; Richard Ffrench-Constant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Divergence in sex peptide-mediated female post-mating responses in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kristina U Wensing; Claudia Fricke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.