Literature DB >> 22220863

Sexual selection and the evolution of genital shape and complexity in water striders.

Locke Rowe1, Göran Arnqvist.   

Abstract

Animal genitalia show two striking but incompletely understood evolutionary trends: a great evolutionary divergence in the shape of genitalic structures, and characteristic structural complexity. Both features are thought to result from sexual selection, but explicit comparative tests are hampered by the fact that it is difficult to quantify both morphological complexity and divergence in shape. We undertake a comparative study of multiple nongenitalic and male genital traits in a clade of 15 water strider species to quantify complexity and shape divergence. We show that genital structures are more complex and their shape more divergent among species than nongenital traits. Further, intromittent genital traits are more complex and have evolved more divergently than nonintromittent genital traits. More importantly, shape and complexity of nonintromittent genital traits show correlated evolution with indices of premating sexual selection and intromittent genital traits with postmating sexual selection, suggesting that the evolution of different components of genital morphology are shaped independently by distinct forms of sexual selection. Our quantitative results provide direct comparative support for the hypothesis that sexual selection is associated with morphological complexity in genitalic traits and highlight the importance of quantifying morphological shape and complexity, rather than size in studies of genital evolution.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution © 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22220863     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01411.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  27 in total

1.  Sexual conflict and the function of genitalic claws in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Yun Yun Cheng; F Helen Rodd; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  The evolution of sexually antagonistic phenotypes.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Sexual conflict in its ecological setting.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The evolution of relative trait size and shape: insights from the genitalia of dung beetles.

Authors:  Harald F Parzer; P David Polly; Armin P Moczek
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 0.900

5.  Female perception of copulatory courtship by male titillators in a bushcricket.

Authors:  Nadja C Wulff; Stefan Schöneich; Gerlind U C Lehmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Quantitative genetic insights into the coevolutionary dynamics of male and female genitalia.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Emile van Lieshout; Clelia Gasparini
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Baculum morphology predicts reproductive success of male house mice under sexual selection.

Authors:  Paula Stockley; Steven A Ramm; Amy L Sherborne; Michael D F Thom; Steve Paterson; Jane L Hurst
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 7.431

8.  Co-evolution of the mating position and male genitalia in insects: a case study of a hangingfly.

Authors:  Qionghua Gao; Baozhen Hua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Morphology and histology of paryphasmata and hemibaculum of Varanus salvator based on sexual maturity.

Authors:  Alif Yahya Al-Ma'ruf; Regita Permata Sari; Imam Mustofa; Suzanita Utama; Chairul Anwar; Maslichah Mafruchati; Eka Pramyrtha Hestianah; Lita Rakhma Yustinasari; Benjamin Christoffel Tehupuring; Djoko Legowo; Boedi Setiawan
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Remating and sperm competition in replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster adapted to alternative environments.

Authors:  Devin Arbuthnott; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.