Literature DB >> 12038533

Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes.

Locke Rowe1, Göran Arnqvist.   

Abstract

We combined experimental and comparative techniques to study the evolution of mating behaviors within in a clade of 15 water striders (Gerris spp.). Superfluous multiple mating is costly to females in this group, and consequently there is overt conflict between the sexes over mating. Two alternative hypotheses that could generate interspecific variation in mating behaviors are tested: interspecific variation in optimal female mating rate versus sexually antagonistic coevolution of persistence and resistance traits. These potentially coevolving traits include male grasping and female antigrasping structures that further the interests of one sex over the other during premating struggles. Both processes are known to play a role in observed behavioral variation within species. We used two large sets of experiments to quantify behavioral differences among species, as well as their response to an environmentally (sex-ratio) induced change in optimal female mating rate. Our analysis revealed a large degree of continuous interspecific variation in all 20 quantified behavioral variables. Nevertheless, species shared the same set of behaviors, and each responded in a qualitatively similar fashion to sex-ratio alterations. A remarkably large proportion (> 50%) of all interspecific variation in the magnitude of behaviors, including their response to sex ratio, could be captured by a single multivariate axis. These data suggest tight coevolution of behaviors within a shared mating system. The pattern of correlated evolution was best accounted for by antagonistic coevolution in the relative abilities of each sex to control the outcome of premating struggles. In species where males have a relative advantage, mating activity is high, and the opposite is found in species where females have gained a relative advantage. Our analyses also suggested that evolution has been unconstrained by history, with no consistent evolutionary tendency toward or away from male or female relative advantage.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12038533     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01386.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  24 in total

1.  Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Erin Cameron; Troy Day
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Scott Pitnick; Francisco García-González
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The evolution of optimal female mating rate changes the coevolutionary dynamics of female resistance and male persistence.

Authors:  Erem Kazancioğlu; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Troy Day
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles.

Authors:  Johanna Rönn; Mari Katvala; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Evolution of genitalia: theories, evidence, and new directions.

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  The molecular basis of speciation: from patterns to processes, rules to mechanisms.

Authors:  Rob J Kulathinal; Rama S Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Stéphanie Bedhomme; N G Prasad; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 10.  The evolution of sexually antagonistic phenotypes.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.