Literature DB >> 11815405

Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.

Joan L Bottorff1, Pamela A Ratner, Lynda G Balneaves, Chris G Richardson, Mary McCullum, Tom Hack, Karen Chalmers, Jane Buxton.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk. Randomly selected samples of 761 women without breast cancer from the general population of British Columbia, Canada, and 260 women with breast cancer from the provincial cancer registry participated in a telephone survey that assessed interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk, knowledge of hereditary breast cancer and genetic testing, and sociodemographics. Women with breast cancer did not possess superior knowledge of breast cancer genetics compared with women from the general population. Of the women with breast cancer, 30.8% reported interest in testing or had been tested, compared with 28.5% of women without breast cancer. Controlling for differences in age, education, personal history of breast cancer, and knowledge of genetics, women with at least one relative with breast cancer were 2.3 times more likely to express interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk than those with no family history. There were significant interactions between breast cancer status and education and between age and knowledge of breast cancer genetics. Women without breast cancer and with a positive family history, who were between 20 and 40 years of age, were most likely to be interested in testing. The women with breast cancer who were interested in testing tended to be approximately 50 years of age, had a positive family history, and had more years of education. Women with a family history of breast cancer, well-educated women with breast cancer, and younger women, particularly those with knowledge of genetic testing, are important target audiences for community-based education on genetic testing for breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11815405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  25 in total

1.  High acceptance of an early dyslexia screening test involving genetic analyses in Germany.

Authors:  Arndt Wilcke; Bent Müller; Gesa Schaadt; Holger Kirsten; Johannes Boltze
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Measuring genetic knowledge: a brief survey instrument for adolescents and adults.

Authors:  S M Fitzgerald-Butt; A Bodine; K M Fry; J Ash; A N Zaidi; V Garg; C A Gerhardt; K L McBride
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.

Authors:  Kristina G Flores; Laurie E Steffen; Christopher J McLouth; Belinda E Vicuña; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Lucretia Vigil; Zoneddy R Dayao; Melanie E Royce; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Cost sharing and hereditary cancer risk: predictors of willingness-to-pay for genetic testing.

Authors:  Jennifer M Matro; Karen J Ruth; Yu-Ning Wong; Katen C McCully; Christina M Rybak; Neal J Meropol; Michael J Hall
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Why Is Cancer Genetic Counseling Underutilized by Women Identified as at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer? Patient Perceptions of Barriers Following a Referral Letter.

Authors:  Alyssa Kne; Heather Zierhut; Shari Baldinger; Karen K Swenson; Pamela Mink; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Michaela L Tsai
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Reproductive Decision-Making in Women with BRCA1/2 Mutations.

Authors:  Jessica L Chan; Lauren N C Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Laura DiGiovanni; Chan Voong; Susan M Domchek; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Predictors of uptake of obesity genetic testing among affected adults.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Marcia Polansky; Pamela Sankar
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Genetic testing for the susceptibility to alcohol dependence: interest and concerns in an African American population.

Authors:  Denise M Scott; Evaristus Nwulia; John Kwagyan; Gloria Cain; Vanessa J Marshall; Nnenna Kalu; Altovise Ewing; Robert E Taylor
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2014-06-13

10.  The withdrawal from oncogenetic counselling and testing for hereditary and familial breast and ovarian cancer. A descriptive study of an Italian sample.

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Gabriella Maggi; Fabio Massimo Sega; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.