Literature DB >> 26028117

Effects of corneal irregular astigmatism on visual acuity after conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Daisuke Tomida1, Takefumi Yamaguchi, Akiko Ogawa, Yumiko Hirayama, Seika Shimazaki-Den, Yoshiyuki Satake, Jun Shimazaki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare short-term outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using a graft prepared with either a femtosecond laser or a microkeratome.
METHODS: Thirty-eight patients underwent DSAEK with grafts prepared with either a femtosecond laser (f-DSAEK; 21 eyes) or a microkeratome (m-DSAEK; 17 eyes). Visual acuity, endothelial cell density, regular astigmatism and irregular astigmatism were compared between the two groups preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively. Fourier analysis was conducted to calculate astigmatism of the anterior and posterior surfaces, and total cornea, using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).
RESULTS: Visual acuity (logMAR) improved from 1.20 ± 0.60 to 0.43 ± 0.25 after m-DSAEK (P < 0.001) and from 1.20 ± 0.57 to 0.77 ± 0.33 after f-DSAEK (P = 0.0028) at 6 months following DSAEK. Visual acuity after m-DSAEK was significantly better than after f-DSAEK at 1, 3, and 6 months (P < 0.05). AS-OCT corneal images revealed greater irregularities on the posterior surfaces of f-DSAEK grafts compared to m-DSAEK grafts. Irregular astigmatism of the total cornea and the posterior surface was significantly larger after f-DSAEK than after m-DSAEK, although there was no significant difference in irregular astigmatism of the anterior surface at 6 months. Postoperative visual acuity was significantly correlated with the postoperative irregular astigmatism of the total cornea (r = 0.6657 and P < 0.001) and the anterior (r = 0.416, P = 0.016) and posterior surfaces (r = 0.7046, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes after f-DSAEK were poor compared to conventional m-DSAEK due to an increase in irregular astigmatism caused by posterior surface irregularities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26028117     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-015-0388-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  32 in total

1.  Preliminary results of femtosecond laser-assisted descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Yanny Y Y Cheng; Fred Hendrikse; Elisabeth Pels; Robert-Jan Wijdh; Hugo van Cleynenbreugel; Cathariena A Eggink; Gabriel van Rij; Wilhelmina J Rijneveld; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10

Review 2.  Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK--the thinner the better?

Authors:  Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Quality of vision after femtosecond laser-assisted descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized, multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Yanny Y Y Cheng; Tom J T P van den Berg; Jan S Schouten; Elisabeth Pels; Robert-Jan Wijdh; Hugo van Cleynenbreugel; Catharina A Eggink; Wilhelmina J Rijneveld; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  The contribution of the posterior surface to the corneal aberrations in eyes after keratoplasty.

Authors:  Takefumi Yamaguchi; Kazuhiko Ohnuma; Daisuke Tomida; Kenji Konomi; Yoshiyuki Satake; Kazuno Negishi; Kazuo Tsubota; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Michael Rudolph; Kathrin Laaser; Bjoern O Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen; Daniel Epstein; Friedrich E Kruse
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond-laser technology.

Authors:  George D Kymionis; George A Kontadakis; Michael A Grentzelos; Sophia I Panagopoulou; Nela Stojanovic; Vardhaman P Kankariya; Bonnie A Henderson; Ioannis G Pallikaris
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Comparison of mechanical and femtosecond laser tunnel creation for intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus: prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Anil Kubaloglu; Esin Sogutlu Sari; Yasin Cinar; Kürşat Cingu; Arif Koytak; Erol Coşkun; Yusuf Ozertürk
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Effects of graft thickness and asymmetry on visual gain and aberrations after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mor M Dickman; Yanny Y Y Cheng; Tos T J M Berendschot; Frank J H M van den Biggelaar; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  Penetrating keratoplasty using femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty with zig-zag incisions versus a mechanical trephine in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Ronald N Gaster; Oanna Dumitrascu; Yaron S Rabinowitz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant.

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of four methods of surface roughness assessment of corneal stromal bed after lamellar cutting.

Authors:  Clotilde Jumelle; Alina Hamri; Gregory Egaud; Cyril Mauclair; Stephanie Reynaud; Virginie Dumas; Sandrine Pereira; Thibaud Garcin; Philippe Gain; Gilles Thuret
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  SMILE after DALK to reduce residual refraction: two-year results.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim; Saied Shahhoseini; Alireza Moghaddasi; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Corneal Higher Order Aberrations in Granular, Lattice and Macular Corneal Dystrophies.

Authors:  Yukari Yagi-Yaguchi; Takefumi Yamaguchi; Yumi Okuyama; Yoshiyuki Satake; Kazuo Tsubota; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Lamellar keratoplasty techniques.

Authors:  Nadisha P Singh; Dalia G Said; Harminder Singh Dua
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Comparison of Artificial Anterior Chamber Internal Pressures and Cutting Systems for Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sota Nishisako; Dai Aoki; Chiaki Sasaki; Kazunari Higa; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Corneal irregularity and visual function using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in TGFBI corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Yuito Abe; Takashi Omoto; Kohdai Kitamoto; Tetsuya Toyono; Junko Yoshida; Ryo Asaoka; Satoru Yamagami; Takashi Miyai; Tomohiko Usui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.