Literature DB >> 26024743

Incidence of bone pain in patients with breast cancer treated with lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: an integrated analysis from phase II and III studies.

I M Bondarenko1, P Bias2, A Buchner3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lipegfilgrastim is a once-per-cycle, fixed-dose, glycoPEGylated recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) recently approved in Europe to reduce the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Bone pain-related (BPR) adverse events are commonly associated with G-CSF therapy. This post hoc analysis examined BPR treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in two comparative studies of lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy.
METHODS: A post hoc analysis was conducted using integrated data from two double-blind randomized studies in patients with breast cancer receiving docetaxel and doxorubicin and treated prophylactically with subcutaneous lipegfilgrastim 6 mg or pegfilgrastim 6 mg once per cycle. BPR TEAEs were defined as arthralgia, back pain, bone pain, musculoskeletal chest pain, musculoskeletal discomfort, musculoskeletal pain, myalgia, neck pain, noncardiac chest pain, and pain in extremity. Relationship of BPR TEAEs to study treatment or chemotherapy was also reported by the investigators.
RESULTS: The analysis included 306 patients (lipegfilgrastim: n = 151; pegfilgrastim: n = 155). The proportion of patients experiencing BPR TEAEs was similar with lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim (25.2 vs 21.9%, respectively), as was the proportion of patients experiencing BPR treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions (TEADRs) (18.5 vs 16.8%, respectively). No BPR TEADRs were serious, and none led to discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonsevere BPR TEAEs and TEADRs were observed in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and G-CSF; rates of BPR events were similar between lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim. The similar BPR safety profile of lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim provides support for use in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone pain; Docetaxel; Doxorubicin; Drug-related side effect; Lipegfilgrastim; Pegfilgrastim

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26024743     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2777-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  22 in total

1.  Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the applications.

Authors:  J Crawford; C Caserta; F Roila
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

Authors:  Charles L Vogel; Marek Z Wojtukiewicz; Robert R Carroll; Sergei A Tjulandin; Luis Javier Barajas-Figueroa; Brian L Wiens; Theresa A Neumann; Lee S Schwartzberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer.

Authors:  F A Holmes; J A O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; S E Jones; J Shogan; M Savin; J Glaspy; M Moore; L Meza; I Wiznitzer; T A Neumann; L R Hill; B C Liang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Prevention of pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain: a phase III double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the university of rochester cancer center clinical community oncology program research base.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Kirshner; Charles E Heckler; Michelle C Janelsins; Shaker R Dakhil; Judith O Hopkins; Charlotte Coles; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicolas André; Maria El Kababri; Pourroy Bertrand; Angelique Rome; Carole Coze; Jean Claude Gentet; Jean Louis Bernard
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  F A Holmes; S E Jones; J O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; T George; M Savin; D Richards; J Glaspy; L Meza; G Cohen; M Dhami; D R Budman; J Hackett; M Brassard; B B Yang; B C Liang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 8.  Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katy L Cooper; Jason Madan; Sophie Whyte; Matt D Stevenson; Ron L Akehurst
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.

Authors:  D Almenar; J Mayans; O Juan; J M Garcia Bueno; J I Jalon Lopez; A Frau; M Guinot; P Cerezuela; E Garcia Buscalla; J A Gasquet; J Sanchez
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 2.520

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer and chronic pain: a mixed methods review.

Authors:  Lorraine R Feeney; Shona M Tormey; Dominic C Harmon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Does bevacizumab increase joint pain in patients with cancer? Results of the prospective observational BEVARTHRALGIA study.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Vieillard; Anthony Turpin; Enora Vauléon; Hélène Behal; Loïc Lebellec; Renaud Desbarbieux; Simon Baldacci; Nicolas Simon; Diane Pannier
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  A multinational, drug utilization study of lipegfilgrastim use in real-world setting in Europe.

Authors:  Sigal Kaplan; Dana Ilic Bogojevic; Carolyn Rainville; Nicholas Gross
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  A randomized, double-blind, active control, multicenter, dose-finding study of lipegfilgrastim (XM22) in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  Anton Buchner; Reiner Elsässer; Peter Bias
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Lipegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia of cancer patients.

Authors:  Roberto Guariglia; Maria Carmen Martorelli; Rosa Lerose; Donatella Telesca; Maria Rita Milella; Pellegrino Musto
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2016-01-22

Review 6.  Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events.

Authors:  T Christopher Bond; Erika Szabo; Susan Gabriel; Jean Klastersky; Omar Tomey; Udo Mueller; Lee Schwartzberg; Boxiong Tang
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 1.809

7.  Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Secondary Prophylactic Pegylated G-CSF in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with mFOLFIRINOX: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamao; Mamoru Takenaka; Tomoe Yoshikawa; Rei Ishikawa; Ayana Okamoto; Tomohiro Yamazaki; Atsushi Nakai; Shunsuke Omoto; Ken Kamata; Kosuke Minaga; Satoru Hagiwara; Toshiharu Sakurai; Naoshi Nishida; Yasutaka Chiba; Tomohiro Watanabe; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 1.271

8.  The prophylactic effects of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in newly diagnosed patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Lei Li; Shuiqing Ma; Ming Wu; Xianjie Tan; Sen Zhong; Jinghe Lang
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.568

9.  Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Lin Chen; Fen Liu; Ning Zhao; Liyao Xu; Biqi Fu; Yong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.