Lorraine R Feeney1, Shona M Tormey2, Dominic C Harmon3,4. 1. Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. 2. Department of Surgery, Limerick University Hospital, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland. 3. Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. harmondominic@gmail.com. 4. Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Limerick University Hospital, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland. harmondominic@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More patients are surviving breast cancer; however, many complain of persistent pain, which significantly impacts on their lives. Studies have predominantly examined risk factors alone. This mixed methods study will systematically compare prospective and retrospective studies of chronic pain following breast cancer treatment. A wider scope than risk factors alone is included in a narrative review element. RESULTS: Common risk factors and themes were identified, and these were compared with some of the retrospective literature available. Several common themes arose in the literature such as common patient demographics, perioperative and postoperative management, treatment modalities and psychological factors. The variation in disease severity, treatment mode and symptom progression between participants in the studies made it difficult to draw conclusions from both the prospective and retrospective literature. CONCLUSION: Chronic pain is common after breast cancer. The literature has focused predominantly on risk factors for the development of chronic pain. It may be more beneficial to focus on chronic pain mechanisms and to consider the patient's narrative and experience of their illness and how this has impacted on the perception and intensity of persistent pain. A shared understanding between the patient and professional is likely to have more beneficial outcomes.
BACKGROUND: More patients are surviving breast cancer; however, many complain of persistent pain, which significantly impacts on their lives. Studies have predominantly examined risk factors alone. This mixed methods study will systematically compare prospective and retrospective studies of chronic pain following breast cancer treatment. A wider scope than risk factors alone is included in a narrative review element. RESULTS: Common risk factors and themes were identified, and these were compared with some of the retrospective literature available. Several common themes arose in the literature such as common patient demographics, perioperative and postoperative management, treatment modalities and psychological factors. The variation in disease severity, treatment mode and symptom progression between participants in the studies made it difficult to draw conclusions from both the prospective and retrospective literature. CONCLUSION:Chronic pain is common after breast cancer. The literature has focused predominantly on risk factors for the development of chronic pain. It may be more beneficial to focus on chronic pain mechanisms and to consider the patient's narrative and experience of their illness and how this has impacted on the perception and intensity of persistent pain. A shared understanding between the patient and professional is likely to have more beneficial outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer pain; Narrative medicine; Persistent; Review; Therapeutic relationship
Authors: Christine Miaskowski; Steven M Paul; Bruce Cooper; Claudia West; Jon D Levine; Charles Elboim; Deborah Hamolsky; Gary Abrams; Judith Luce; Anand Dhruva; Dale J Langford; John D Merriman; Kord Kober; Christina Baggott; Heather Leutwyler; Bradley E Aouizerat Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: M Soledad Cepeda; C Richard Chapman; Nelcy Miranda; Ricardo Sanchez; Carlos H Rodriguez; Andres E Restrepo; Lina M Ferrer; Rene A Linares; Daniel B Carr Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2008-03-24 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Gildasio S De Oliveira; Ray Chang; Seema A Khan; Nora M Hansen; Jamil H Khan; Robert J McCarthy; Apkar V Apkarian Journal: Breast J Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Dana H Bovbjerg; Francis J Keefe; Mary S Soo; Jessica Manculich; Alyssa Van Denburg; Margarita L Zuley; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Celette S Skinner; Sara N Edmond; Rebecca A Shelby Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: María Torres-Lacomba; Beatriz Navarro-Brazález; Javier Bailón-Cerezo; Fernando Vergara-Pérez; Irene de la Rosa-Díaz; Virginia Prieto-Gómez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Karen E Alsbrook; Caroline K Harpel; Paul W Scott; Annie D Hayden; Colleen J Dunwoody; Susan W Wesmiller Journal: Pain Manag Nurs Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 2.356
Authors: Ivana Leao Ribeiro; Ximena Gálvez González; Diego Lara Torres; Luz Alejandra Lorca; Snehil Dixit; Nicolás Yáñez Benavides; Francisco Ortega Gonzalez Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2021-10-18
Authors: Laura Lorenzo-Gallego; Beatriz Arranz-Martín; Helena Romay-Barrero; Virginia Prieto-Gómez; Enrique Lluch; María Torres-Lacomba Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390