Literature DB >> 22508813

Prevention of pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain: a phase III double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the university of rochester cancer center clinical community oncology program research base.

Jeffrey J Kirshner1, Charles E Heckler, Michelle C Janelsins, Shaker R Dakhil, Judith O Hopkins, Charlotte Coles, Gary R Morrow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain is a significant clinical problem that may result in discontinuation of pegfilgrastim and lead to less effective chemotherapy dosing. Interventions for pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain are needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The University of Rochester Cancer Center Clinical Community Oncology Program Research Base randomly assigned 510 patients at 17 sites to receive either naproxen (500 mg two times per day) or placebo on the day of pegfilgrastim administration, continuing for 5 to 8 days after pegfilgrastim. Patients recorded pain severity (using a scale of 0 to 10) and duration in daily diaries. The primary outcome measure was the area under the curve (AUC) for pain for days 1 through 5. Secondary outcome measures included the identification of risk factors for the development of pain and response to naproxen.
RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 55.6 years and 86% were female. Sixty-eight percent of patients had breast cancer and 10% had lung cancer. Pain reached its peak at 3 days for both groups. The mean AUC for pain was 7.71 for the placebo group and 6.04 for the naproxen group (P = .037). Naproxen reduced maximum pain from 3.40 to 2.59 (P = .005). Naproxen also reduced overall pain incidence from 71.3% to 61.1% (P = .020) and duration from 2.40 to 1.92 days (P = .009). The reduction in severe pain (> 5 on a scale of 1 to 10) from 27.0% to 19.2% was also significant (P = .048). Risk factors could not be identified to predict incidence, severity, or ability to prevent pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain.
CONCLUSION: Our phase III randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial demonstrated that naproxen at a dose of 500 mg twice per day is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508813      PMCID: PMC3383174          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

1.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of filgrastim in remission induction and consolidation therapy for adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. The International Acute Myeloid Leukemia Study Group.

Authors:  G Heil; D Hoelzer; M A Sanz; K Lechner; J A Liu Yin; G Papa; L Noens; J Szer; A Ganser; C O'Brien; J Matcham; A Barge
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741.

Authors:  Marc L Citron; Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer; William J Gradishar; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Robert Livingston; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; John Carpenter; David Hurd; James F Holland; Barbara L Smith; Carolyn I Sartor; Eleanor H Leung; Jeffrey Abrams; Richard L Schilsky; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; T R Mendoza; X S Wang; C Chou; M T Harle; M Morrissey; M C Engstrom
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Occurrence, severity, and longitudinal course of twelve common symptoms in 1129 consecutive patients during radiotherapy for cancer.

Authors:  Jane T Hickok; Gary R Morrow; Joseph A Roscoe; Karen Mustian; Paul Okunieff
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 5.  Once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Authors:  Jeffrey Crawford
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 6.  The role of pegfilgrastim in mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Frank Kroschinsky; Kristina Hölig; Gerhard Ehninger
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 1.764

Review 7.  Neulasta (pegfilgrastim): a once-per-cycle option for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Authors:  Laura Biganzoli; Michael Untch; Tomas Skacel; José-Luis Pico
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 8.  Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.705

9.  Bone pain associated with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is similar to daily filgrastim in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ernst Kubista; John Glaspy; Frankie Ann Holmes; Michael D Green; James Hackett; Theresa Neumann
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Randomised trial: survival benefit and safety of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  S Kümmel; J Krocker; A Kohls; G-P Breitbach; G Morack; M Budner; J-U Blohmer; D Elling
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  21 in total

1.  A Phase I study to determine safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ANF-RHO™, a novel PEGylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Hemant Misra; John Berryman; Ronald Jubin; Abraham Abuchowski
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Prevention of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) induced bone pain using double histamine blockade.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gavioli; Misty Abrams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Randomized phase II study of loratadine for the prevention of bone pain caused by pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  J Moukharskaya; D M Abrams; T Ashikaga; F Khan; J Schwartz; K Wilson; C Verschraegen; T Openshaw; J Valentine; J Eneman; P Unger; S Ades
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  New Persistent Opioid Use Among Patients With Cancer After Curative-Intent Surgery.

Authors:  Jay Soong-Jin Lee; Hsou Mei Hu; Anthony L Edelman; Chad M Brummett; Michael J Englesbe; Jennifer F Waljee; Jeffrey B Smerage; Jennifer J Griggs; Hari Nathan; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Lesly A Dossett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Incidence of bone pain in patients with breast cancer treated with lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: an integrated analysis from phase II and III studies.

Authors:  I M Bondarenko; P Bias; A Buchner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  KU32 prevents 5-fluorouracil induced cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Michael J Sofis; David P Jarmolowicz; Sam V Kaplan; Rachel C Gehringer; Shea M Lemley; Gaurav Garg; Brian S Blagg; Michael A Johnson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Risk factors for bone pain among patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  H Xu; Q Gong; F D Vogl; M Reiner; J H Page
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Current state and future opportunities in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).

Authors:  Hartmut Link
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.359

9.  Predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis focusing on RDI using ordered logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  Yuko Kanbayashi; Takeshi Ishikawa; Motohiro Kanazawa; Yuki Nakajima; Rumi Kawano; Yusuke Tabuchi; Tomoko Yoshioka; Norihiko Ihara; Toyoshi Hosokawa; Koichi Takayama; Keisuke Shikata; Tetsuya Taguchi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Risk factor analysis for taxane-associated acute pain syndrome under the dexamethasone prophylaxis.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Saito; Yoh Takekuma; Masaki Kobayashi; Tatsuhiko Sakamoto; Hiroko Yamashita; Mitsuru Sugawara
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.