Literature DB >> 11821454

Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer.

F A Holmes1, J A O'Shaughnessy, S Vukelja, S E Jones, J Shogan, M Savin, J Glaspy, M Moore, L Meza, I Wiznitzer, T A Neumann, L R Hill, B C Liang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-control study was designed to determine whether a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (SD/01, sustained-duration filgrastim; 100 microg/kg) is as safe and effective as daily filgrastim (5 microg/kg/d) for reducing neutropenia in patients who received four cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two centers enrolled 310 patients who received chemotherapy with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of four cycles. Patients were randomized to receive on day 2 either a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg per chemotherapy cycle (154 patients) or daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d (156 patients). Absolute neutrophil count (ANC), duration of grade 4 neutropenia, and safety parameters were monitored.
RESULTS: One dose of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle was comparable to daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim with regard to all efficacy end points, including the duration of severe neutropenia and the depth of ANC nadir in all cycles. Febrile neutropenia across all cycles occurred less often in patients who received pegfilgrastim. The difference in the mean duration of severe neutropenia between the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim treatment groups was less than 1 day. Pegfilgrastim was safe and well tolerated, and it was similar to filgrastim. Adverse event profiles in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups were similar.
CONCLUSION: A single injection of pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg per cycle was as safe and effective as daily injections of filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d in reducing neutropenia and its complications in patients who received four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11821454     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  123 in total

1.  Usage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor every 2 days is clinically useful and cost-effective for febrile neutropenia during early courses of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yakushijin; Hisaharu Shikata; Ikue Takaoka; Tamami Horikawa; Kazuhito Takeuchi; Jun Yamanouchi; Taichi Azuma; Hiroshi Narumi; Takaaki Hato; Masaki Yasukawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Phase I trial of infusional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Abdissa Negassa; Erick Lansigan; Robin Locke; Chamath R De Silva; Peter H Wiernik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Safety Profile of Biosimilar Filgrastim (Zarzio/Zarxio): A Combined Analysis of Phase III Studies.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Pere Gascón; Andriy Krendyukov; Nadja Hoebel; Sreekanth Gattu; Kimberly Blackwell
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-09

4.  Uptake and economic impact of first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use during adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Elizabeth T Wilde; Jason D Wright; Donna L Buono; Kevin Kalinsky; Jennifer L Malin; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in a Canadian outpatient setting.

Authors:  S Fine; M Koo; T Gill; M Marin; M Poulin-Costello; R Barron; N Mittmann
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Jeffrey Crawford; Didier Kamioner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Neutrophil biology and the next generation of myeloid growth factors.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Wendy J Langeberg; Conchitina C Siozon; John H Page; P K Morrow; Victoria M Chia
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Prevention of febrile neutropenia: use of prophylactic antibiotics.

Authors:  M Cullen; S Baijal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.

Authors:  D Almenar; J Mayans; O Juan; J M Garcia Bueno; J I Jalon Lopez; A Frau; M Guinot; P Cerezuela; E Garcia Buscalla; J A Gasquet; J Sanchez
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 2.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.