Literature DB >> 26019020

Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Kazutaka Obama1,2, Yoshiharu Sakai3.   

Abstract

Although over 3000 da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS) devices have been installed worldwide, robotic surgery for gastric cancer has not yet become widely spread and is only available in several advanced institutions. This is because, at least in part, the advantages of robotic surgery for gastric cancer remain unclear. The safety and feasibility of robotic gastrectomy have been demonstrated in several retrospective studies. However, no sound evidence has been reported to support the superiority of a robotic approach for gastric cancer treatment. In addition, the long-term clinical outcomes following robotic gastrectomy have yet to be clarified. Nevertheless, a robotic approach can potentially overcome the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery if the advantageous functions of this technique are optimized, such as the use of wristed instruments, tremor filtering and high-resolution 3-D images. The potential advantages of robotic gastrectomy have been discussed in several retrospective studies, including the ability to achieve sufficient lymphadenectomy in the area of the splenic hilum, reductions in local complication rates and a shorter learning curve for the robotic approach compared to conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy. In this review, we present the current status and discuss issues regarding robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D2 lymphadenectomy; Gastric cancer; Robotic gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26019020     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-015-1190-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  38 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Yi-Ke Zeng; Zu-Li Yang; Jun-Sheng Peng; Han-Sheng Lin; Ling Cai
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Osamu Ikeda; Masako Urata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer.

Authors:  B W Eom; H M Yoon; K W Ryu; J H Lee; S J Cho; J Y Lee; C G Kim; I J Choi; J S Lee; M C Kook; J Y Rhee; S R Park; Y W Kim
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Song Shen; Hong-Qing Xi; Lin Chen; Bo Wei
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Robotics in general surgery: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Se-Jin Baek; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2014-05

7.  Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy.

Authors:  K M Kim; J Y An; H I Kim; J H Cheong; W J Hyung; S H Noh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kuo-Hung Huang; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Wen-Liang Fang; Jen-Hao Chen; Su-Shun Lo; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Chew-Wun Wu; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Robotic gastrectomy: the current state of the art.

Authors:  Alessandra Marano; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.720

10.  Emerging Role of Robot-assisted Gastrectomy: Analysis of Consecutive 200 Cases.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Park; Young-Woo Kim; Keun Won Ryu; Bang Wool Eom; Hong Man Yoon; Daniel Reim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Lorenzo De Franco; Franco Franceschini; Andrea Coratti; Graziano Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Adjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Takaki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Effectiveness and safety of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 12,401 gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Han-Dong Liu; Kun Yang; Ze-Hua Chen; Yue-Xin Zhang; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-16

Review 4.  Current status and future perspectives of robotic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Takuya Saito; Yasuyuki Fukami; Shintaro Kurahashi; Kohei Yasui; Tairin Uchino; Tatsuki Matsumura; Takaaki Osawa; Shunichiro Komatsu; Kenitiro Kaneko; Tsuyoshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.540

5.  Safety assessment of robotic gastrectomy and analysis of surgical learning process: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Norihiro Shimoike; Tatsuto Nishigori; Yoshito Yamashita; Masato Kondo; Dai Manaka; Yoshio Kadokawa; Atsushi Itami; Seiichiro Kanaya; Hisahiro Hosogi; Seiji Satoh; Hiroaki Hata; Takatsugu Kan; Hironori Kawada; Michihiro Yamamoto; Eiji Tanaka; Shigeru Tsunoda; Shigeo Hisamori; Koya Hida; Kentaro Ueno; Shiro Tanaka; Kazutaka Obama
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.701

Review 6.  Minimally invasive surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Our experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Kazuki Inaba; Yoshinori Ishida; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study.

Authors:  Fabio Cianchi; Giampiero Indennitate; Giacomo Trallori; Manuela Ortolani; Beatrice Paoli; Giuseppe Macrì; Gabriele Lami; Beatrice Mallardi; Benedetta Badii; Fabio Staderini; Etleva Qirici; Antonio Taddei; Maria Novella Ringressi; Luca Messerini; Luca Novelli; Siro Bagnoli; Andrea Bonanomi; Caterina Foppa; Ileana Skalamera; Giulia Fiorenza; Giuliano Perigli
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Case report about a successful full robotic radical gastric cancer surgery with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis in a patient with situs inversus totalis and a two-and-a-half-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Hai-Bin Dai; Zhi-Chun Wang; Xiao-Bo Feng; Gang Wang; Wei-Yan Li; Chun-Hua Hang; Zhi-Wei Jiang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Franco Franceschini; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Mario Annecchiarico; Graziano Ceccarelli; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-16

Review 10.  Local resection of the stomach for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shinichi Kinami; Hiroshi Funaki; Hideto Fujita; Yasuharu Nakano; Nobuhiko Ueda; Takeo Kosaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.