Literature DB >> 23034831

Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy.

K M Kim1, J Y An, H I Kim, J H Cheong, W J Hyung, S H Noh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy have been adopted rapidly despite lack of evidence concerning technical safety and controversy regarding additional benefits. This study aimed to compare clinically relevant complications after open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on surgical complications in patients undergoing gastrectomy with curative intent for histologically proven adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2010 at the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine in Seoul, Korea. Complications were categorized into wound infection, bleeding, anastomotic leak, obstruction, fluid collection and other.
RESULTS: In a total of 5839 patients (4542 open, 861 laparoscopic and 436 robotic gastrectomies), overall complication, reoperation and mortality rates were 10·5, 1·0 and 0·4 per cent respectively. There were no significant differences between the three groups. Ileus (P = 0·001) and intra-abdominal fluid collections (P = 0·013) were commoner after conventional open surgery. However, tumour stage was higher and more complex resections were performed in the open group. Anastomotic leak, the leading cause of death, occurred more often after a minimally invasive approach (P = 0·017).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy had overall complication and mortality rates similar to those of open surgery, but anastomotic leaks were more common with the minimally invasive techniques.
Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23034831     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  51 in total

1.  Late phase II study of robot-assisted gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Yuiciro Miki; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robot-assisted surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Livia Procopiuc; Ştefan Tudor; Mircea Mănuc; Mircea Diculescu; Cătălin Vasilescu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15

Review 3.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Lorenzo De Franco; Franco Franceschini; Andrea Coratti; Graziano Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hirokazu Noshiro; Shuji Takiguchi; Kazuhisa Ehara; Kazutaka Obama; Shiro Kuwabara; Hiroshi Okabe; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Oncological, Cost, and Surgical Stress Analysis.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Hua-Long Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Ying Kong; Shougen Cao; Xiaodong Liu; Zequn Li; Liankai Wang; Cunlong Lu; Shuai Shen; Houxin Zhu; Yanbing Zhou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ali Güner; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-03-01

Review 9.  Robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Terashima; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taaichi Kawamura; Yuichiro Miki; Rie Makuuchi; Shinsaku Honda; Taichi Tatsubayashi; Wataru Takagi; Hayato Omori; Fumiko Hirata
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 10.  Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazutaka Obama; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.