Literature DB >> 34860300

Current status and future perspectives of robotic inguinal hernia repair.

Takuya Saito1, Yasuyuki Fukami2, Shintaro Kurahashi2, Kohei Yasui2, Tairin Uchino2, Tatsuki Matsumura2, Takaaki Osawa2, Shunichiro Komatsu2, Kenitiro Kaneko2, Tsuyoshi Sano2.   

Abstract

With more than 5500 da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS) installed worldwide, the robotic approach for general surgery, including for inguinal hernia repair, is gaining popularity in the USA. However, in many countries outside the USA, robotic surgery is performed at only a few advanced institutions; therefore, its advantages over the open or laparoscopic approaches for inguinal hernia repair are unclear. Several retrospective studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, but there is still no firm evidence to support the superiority of robotic surgery for this procedure or its long-term clinical outcomes. Robotic surgery has the potential to overcome the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery through appropriate utilization of technological advantages, such as wristed instruments, tremor filtering, and high-resolution 3D images. The potential benefits of robotic inguinal hernia repair are lower rates of complications or recurrence than open and laparoscopic surgery, with less postoperative pain, and a rapid learning curve for surgeons. In this review, we summarize the current status and future prospects of robotic inguinal hernia repair and discuss the issues associated with this procedure.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inguinal hernia repair; Robotic; TAPP; Transabdominal preperitoneal approach

Year:  2021        PMID: 34860300     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02413-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.540


  49 in total

1.  Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hirokazu Noshiro; Shuji Takiguchi; Kazuhisa Ehara; Kazutaka Obama; Shiro Kuwabara; Hiroshi Okabe; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)].

Authors:  R Bittner; M E Arregui; T Bisgaard; M Dudai; G S Ferzli; R J Fitzgibbons; R H Fortelny; U Klinge; F Kockerling; E Kuhry; J Kukleta; D Lomanto; M C Misra; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; W Reinpold; J Rosenberg; S Sauerland; C Schug-Pass; K Singh; M Timoney; D Weyhe; P Chowbey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Ten golden rules for a safe MIS inguinal hernia repair using a new anatomical concept as a guide.

Authors:  Christiano Claus; Marcelo Furtado; Flavio Malcher; Leandro Totti Cavazzola; Edward Felix
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazutaka Obama; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Mariko Man-I; Yoshinori Ishida; Yuichiro Kawamura; Seiji Satoh; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Inguinal hernia repair in adults.

Authors:  V Schumpelick; K H Treutner; G Arlt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-08-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; G Micheletto; F Lombardo; G Bonitta; A Morlacchi; P G Bruni; G Campanelli; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Transabdominal preperitoneal robotic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Fumito Ito; David Jarrard; Jon C Gould
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Combined inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh during transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 4-year experience.

Authors:  David S Finley; Esequiel Rodriguez; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Hernias: inguinal and incisional.

Authors:  Andrew Kingsnorth; Karl LeBlanc
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current status and future perspectives of robotic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Takuya Saito; Yasuyuki Fukami; Shintaro Kurahashi; Kohei Yasui; Tairin Uchino; Tatsuki Matsumura; Takaaki Osawa; Shunichiro Komatsu; Kenitiro Kaneko; Tsuyoshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.540

2.  How to Establish the Bipolar Forceps Dissection Method in Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Takuya Saito; Yasuyuki Fukami; Shunichiro Komatsu; Kenitiro Kaneko; Tsuyoshi Sano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-12-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.