Literature DB >> 26018877

Response-independent outcomes impact response rates and judgments of control differentially depending on rate of response-dependent outcomes.

Phil Reed1.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the impact of response-independent outcome delivery on human rates of response and judgments of control in an instrumental conditioning task. In Experiment 1, when participants responded on a schedule with a relatively high probability of a response producing an outcome, a random ratio (RR-5), judgments of control declined as rates of response-independent outcomes increased. However, when response-dependent outcomes were delivered with a relatively low probability (RR-15), increasing the rate of response-independent outcomes increased rates of response and judgments of control. Experiment 2 replicated this effect, but also noted a differential effect of response-independent outcome and response-independent sensory presentations on response rate and judgments of causal effectiveness. Ratings of the context in which the conditioning occurred suggested these were correlated with total outcome presentation, and that the role of context on response rate and judgments of control may be important to consider.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26018877     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0180-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  21 in total

1.  Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates.

Authors:  P Reed
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-07

2.  Stimulus change as a factor in response maintenance with free food available.

Authors:  S R Osborne; M Shelby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Superimposition of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  I S Burgess; J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Combinations of response-reinforcer dependence and independence.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: the role of action in the illusion of control.

Authors:  Fernando Blanco; Helena Matute; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Potentiation instead of overshadowing in the pigeon.

Authors:  J C Clarke; R F Westbrook; J Irwin
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1979-01

Review 7.  Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla; R L Solomon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Human contingency judgments: rule based or associative?

Authors:  L G Allan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?

Authors:  L B Alloy; L Y Abramson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1979-12

10.  Mediating role of activity level in the depressive realism effect.

Authors:  Fernando Blanco; Helena Matute; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Free operant observing in humans: a translational approach to compulsive certainty seeking.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Sonia Shahper; Naomi A Fineberg; Verena Eisele; Dawn M Eagle; Gonzalo Urcelay; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.143

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.