Literature DB >> 16811799

Combinations of response-reinforcer dependence and independence.

K A Lattal.   

Abstract

The contribution of the response-reinforcer dependency to the control of behavior was investigated. Pigeons were trained to key peck under a variable-interval schedule of reinforcement. With the total number and temporal distribution of reinforcer deliveries in experimental sessions constant, the effects of varying the percentage of response-independent reinforcement were examined. At different times, 100%, 66%, 33%, 10%, or 0% of the scheduled reinforcers were delivered dependent upon key pecking and the remainder were delivered independently of responding. Response rates were related to the percentage of response-dependent reinforcement with lower response rates associated with smaller percentages of response-dependent reinforcement. The results suggest that the response-reinforcer relation exerts control over behavior in a manner similar to that exerted by other parameters of reinforcement.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811799      PMCID: PMC1333276          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Pigeons respond to produce periods in which rewards are independent of responding.

Authors:  A Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Independently delivered food decelerates fixed-ratio rates.

Authors:  D D Edwards; V Peek; F Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter?

Authors:  H Rachlin; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral contrast and response independent reinforcement.

Authors:  M S Halliday; R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response-reinforcer dependence and independence in multiple and mixed schedules.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reponse-reinforcer independence and conventional extinction after fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  Interaction of procedural factors in human performance on yoked schedules.

Authors:  C P Raia; S W Shillingford; H L Miller; P S Baier
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcement contingencies and social reinforcement: some reciprocal relations between basic and applied research.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

3.  Effects of alternative reinforcement on human behavior: the source does matter.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contingency and behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

5.  Differing views of contingencies: How contiguous?

Authors:  K A Lattal; T A Shahan
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1997

6.  Noncontingent reinforcement, alternative reinforcement, and the matching law: a laboratory demonstration.

Authors:  Cheryl L Ecott; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

7.  Response-reinforcer dependency location in interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; T J Freeman; T S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Response-reinforcer independence and the economic continuum: A preliminary analysis.

Authors:  A A Imam
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior.

Authors:  L J Hammond
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies.

Authors:  B A Matthews; E Shimoff; A C Catania; T Sagvolden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.