Literature DB >> 26013442

Utilization and costs associated with robotic surgery in children.

Justin B Mahida1, Jennifer N Cooper2, Daniel Herz3, Karen A Diefenbach4, Katherine J Deans1, Peter C Minneci1, Daryl J McLeod5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate utilization and costs associated with robotic surgery in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients in the Pediatric Health Information System database who underwent robotic surgery between October 2008 and December 2013. After determining the six most frequently performed surgeries in this group, we identified patients who underwent equivalent nonrobotic surgeries at the same hospitals. Equivalent surgeries were defined as open procedures for urology and laparoscopic procedures for general surgery. We examined trends in the numbers of surgeries performed and compared hospitalization costs between patients undergoing elective robotic and nonrobotic surgery for each procedure.
RESULTS: The number of robotic surgeries performed increased by 19.8% per year (P < 0.001). The most common robotic surgeries performed were pyeloplasty (n = 760), ureteral reimplantation (n = 351), nephrectomy (n = 145), partial nephrectomy (n = 56), gastrointestinal antireflux procedure (n = 61), and cholecystectomy (n = 46). Total increase over time was primarily driven by increases in urologic surgeries (17.4% per year, P < 0.001). Postoperative length of stay was shorter after robotic surgeries than equivalent open urologic surgeries but not equivalent laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Total hospitalization costs were higher for robotic surgeries than equivalent urologic or general surgery procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of robotic surgery in pediatrics is increasing especially in the management of urologic conditions. Costs of robotic surgery-associated hospitalizations were higher than nonrobotic surgery-associated hospitalizations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Minimally invasive surgery; Pediatric surgery; Robotic surgery; Urology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013442     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  16 in total

1.  A multi-degree-of-freedom needle driver with a short tip and small shaft for pediatric laparoscopic surgery: in vivo assessment of multi-directional suturing on the vertical plane of the liver in rabbits.

Authors:  Shinya Takazawa; Tetsuya Ishimaru; Masahiro Fujii; Kanako Harada; Kyoichi Deie; Jun Fujishiro; Naohiko Sugita; Mamoru Mitsuishi; Tadashi Iwanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Zhamak Khorgami; Wei T Li; Theresa N Jackson; C Anthony Howard; Guido M Sclabas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Paediatric robotic surgery.

Authors:  Joshua Cave; Simon Clarke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.

Authors:  Briony K Varda; Ye Wang; Benjamin I Chung; Richard S Lee; Michael P Kurtz; Caleb P Nelson; Steven L Chang
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 5.  Global trends in paediatric robot-assisted urological surgery: a bibliometric and Progressive Scholarly Acceptance analysis.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Simon J D Harley; Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Sanjeev Khurana
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-28

6.  Scarless laparoscopic incisions in Pfannenstiel (slip): the first 50 cases using an innovative approach in pediatric robotic surgery.

Authors:  Fulvia Del Conte; Louise Montalva; Liza Ali; Margaux Langeron; Anne-Emmanuelle Colas; Arnaud Bonnard
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-05-27

7.  Comparing the accuracy of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si for image guidance and automation.

Authors:  James M Ferguson; Bryn Pitt; Alan Kuntz; Josephine Granna; Nicholas L Kavoussi; Naren Nimmagadda; Eric J Barth; Stanley Duke Herrell; Robert J Webster
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.483

8.  Open versus minimally invasive ureteroneocystostomy: A population-level analysis.

Authors:  Hsin-Hsiao S Wang; Rohit Tejwani; Glenn M Cannon; Patricio C Gargollo; John S Wiener; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  Postoperative course following complex major pediatric urologic surgery: A single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Aaron Wallace; Maria Veronica Rodriguez; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Open versus minimally-invasive surgical techniques in pediatric renal tumors: A population-level analysis of in-hospital outcomes.

Authors:  Kirsten L Simmons; Jason C Chandrapal; Steven Wolf; Henry E Rice; Elisabeth E Tracy; Tamara Fitzgerald; Gina-Maria Pomann; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.