Literature DB >> 28455800

Global trends in paediatric robot-assisted urological surgery: a bibliometric and Progressive Scholarly Acceptance analysis.

Thomas P Cundy1,2,3, Simon J D Harley4, Hani J Marcus5, Archie Hughes-Hallett5, Sanjeev Khurana6.   

Abstract

The inaugural robot-assisted urological procedure in a child was performed in 2002. This study aims to catalogue the impact of this technology by utilizing bibliographic data as a surrogate measure for global diffusion activity and to appraise the quality of evidence in this field. A systematic literature search was performed to retrieve all reported cases of paediatric robot-assisted urological surgery published between 2003 and 2016. The status of scientific community acceptance was determined using a newly developed analysis model named progressive scholarly acceptance. A total of 151 publications were identified that reported 3688 procedures in 3372 patients. The most reported procedures were pyeloplasty (n = 1923) and ureteral reimplantation (n = 1120). There were 16 countries and 48 institutions represented in the literature. On average, the total case volume reported in the literature more than doubled each year (mean value increase 236.6% per annum). The level of evidence for original studies remains limited to case reports, case series and retrospective comparative studies. Progressive Scholarly Acceptance charts indicate that robot-assisted techniques for pyeloplasty or ureteral reimplantation are yet to be accepted by the scientific community. Global adoption trends for robotic surgery in paediatric urology have been progressive but remain low volume. Pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation are dominant applications. Robot-assisted techniques for these procedures are not supported by high quality evidence at present. Next-generation robots are forecast to be smaller, cheaper, more advanced and customized for paediatric patients. Ongoing critical evaluation must occur simultaneously with expected technology evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Paediatric; Progressive scholarly acceptance; Robot-assisted surgery; Urology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28455800     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0703-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  36 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-Assisted Procedures in Pediatric Surgery: A Critical Appraisal of the Current Best Evidence in Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Florian Friedmacher; Holger Till
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 2.  Current controversies in pediatric urologic robotic surgery.

Authors:  Lorenzo F M Trevisani; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  International attitudes of early adopters to current and future robotic technologies in pediatric surgery.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Azad S Najmaldin; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.

Authors:  John W Yaxley; Geoffrey D Coughlin; Suzanne K Chambers; Stefano Occhipinti; Hema Samaratunga; Leah Zajdlewicz; Nigel Dunglison; Rob Carter; Scott Williams; Diane J Payton; Joanna Perry-Keene; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants.

Authors:  Daniel I Avery; Katherine W Herbst; Thomas S Lendvay; Paul H Noh; Pankaj Dangle; Mohan S Gundeti; Matthew C Steele; Sean T Corbett; Craig A Peters; Christina Kim
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 1.830

6.  Outcomes of complex robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Angela M Arlen; Kristin M Broderick; Curtis Travers; Edwin A Smith; James M Elmore; Andrew J Kirsch
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.830

7.  Impact of increasing prevalence of minimally invasive prostatectomy on open prostatectomy observed in the national inpatient sample and national surgical quality improvement program.

Authors:  Matthias D Hofer; Joshua J Meeks; John Cashy; Shilajit Kundu; Lee C Zhao
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  Robotic surgery in children: adopt now, await, or dismiss?

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Sanjeev Khurana; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort.

Authors:  D Bansal; N G Cost; W R DeFoor; P P Reddy; E A Minevich; B A Vanderbrink; S Alam; C A Sheldon; P H Noh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.830

10.  Simultaneous bilateral robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures in children.

Authors:  Victor Kapoor; Jack S Elder
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-08-02
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in dermatology and healthcare: An overview.

Authors:  Varadraj Vasant Pai; Rohini Bhat Pai
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2021 [SEASON]       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Oncology: Lessons Learned from the First 100 Tumors-A Nationwide Experience.

Authors:  Thomas Blanc; Pierre Meignan; Nicolas Vinit; Quentin Ballouhey; Luca Pio; Carmen Capito; Caroline Harte; Fabrizio Vatta; Louise Galmiche-Rolland; Véronique Minard; Daniel Orbach; Laureline Berteloot; Cécile Muller; Jules Kohaut; Aline Broch; Karim Braik; Aurélien Binet; Yves Heloury; Laurent Fourcade; Hubert Lardy; Sabine Sarnacki
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Soft Robotics: Academic Insights and Perspectives Through Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Guanjun Bao; Hui Fang; Lingfeng Chen; Yuehua Wan; Fang Xu; Qinghua Yang; Libin Zhang
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study.

Authors:  Thomas Blanc; Olivier Abbo; Fabrizio Vatta; Julien Grosman; Fabienne Marquant; Caroline Elie; Mélodie Juricic; Samia Laraqui; Aline Broch; Alexis Arnaud
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  Relative to open surgery, minimally-invasive renal and ureteral pediatric surgery offers no improvement in 30-day complications, yet requires longer operative time: Data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatrics.

Authors:  Marc Colaco; Austin Hester; William Visser; Alison Rasper; Ryan Terlecki
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-04-10

6.  Robotic Anxiety-Parents' Perception of Robot-Assisted Pediatric Surgery.

Authors:  Elisabeth Ammer; Laura Sophie Mandt; Isabelle Christine Silbersdorff; Fritz Kahl; York Hagmayer
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.