Literature DB >> 35622191

Scarless laparoscopic incisions in Pfannenstiel (slip): the first 50 cases using an innovative approach in pediatric robotic surgery.

Fulvia Del Conte1,2, Louise Montalva1,3, Liza Ali1, Margaux Langeron1, Anne-Emmanuelle Colas4, Arnaud Bonnard5,6.   

Abstract

Incisions in the supra-pubic region have been described robotic-assisted surgery to improve cosmetic results in adults, but seldom in children. We aimed to present an innovative trocar placement in the Pfannenstiel line, named Scarless Laparoscopic Incisions in Pfannenstiel (SLIP), and evaluate its feasibility for various intra-abdominal procedures and its cosmetic results in pediatric robotic surgery. We performed a monocentric prospective study, including children undergoing robotic-assisted surgeries using a SLIP approach (July 2019-September 2021). Data regarding demographics, surgery, and outcome were collected and reported as median (range), or number (percentage). Cosmetic results were evaluated with a questionnaire. A SLIP approach was performed in 50 children (24 cholecystectomies, 12 splenectomies, 2 cholecystectomies and splenectomies, 9 colonic resections, 2 choledochal cyst resections, and 1 pancreatic pseudocyst resection). Median age was 11 years (2-18) and median weight 35 kg (10.5-80). Conversion to laparoscopy occurred in two cases. Post-operative complications occurred in 5 patients (10%), after colectomies [intrabdominal abscess (n = 3), stoma dysfunction (n = 1), parietal abscess (n = 1)], of which 3 (6%) required reintervention (intrabdominal abscess n = 2, stoma dysfunction n = 1). Regarding scars, 68% (n = 28) of parents and patients reported the maximal score of 5/5 for global satisfaction and 63% (n = 26) had all scars hidden by underwear. SLIP approach is versatile and can be used in supra- and infra-mesocolic robotic-assisted procedures. The low complication rate shows its safety in both young children and teenagers and does not increase operative difficulties. It results in high patient satisfaction regarding scars, and a scarless abdomen.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavien–Dindo; Da Vinci; ERAS; Minimally invasive surgery; Supra-pubic incisions

Year:  2022        PMID: 35622191     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01419-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  22 in total

1.  Reply to Konstantinos P. Economopoulos, Aliki Stamou, and Theodoros N. Sergentanis' letter to the editor re: Luis Felipe Brandao, Riccardo Autorino, Humberto Laydner, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2014;65:1154-61.

Authors:  Luis Brandao; Homayoun Zargar; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  A comparative cost analysis of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery and open surgery: the necessity of investing knowledgeably.

Authors:  Giorgia Tedesco; Francesco C Faggiano; Erica Leo; Pietro Derrico; Matteo Ritrovato
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Resident training in a new robotic thoracic surgery program.

Authors:  Yasmine N White; Priya Dedhia; Edward J Bergeron; Jules Lin; Andrew A Chang; Rishindra M Reddy
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Utilization and costs associated with robotic surgery in children.

Authors:  Justin B Mahida; Jennifer N Cooper; Daniel Herz; Karen A Diefenbach; Katherine J Deans; Peter C Minneci; Daryl J McLeod
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Prescriptions for pain medication before and after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Jaewhan Kim; Norman Waitzman; Nathan Richards; Ted Adams
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Laparoscopic management of antenatally detected choledochal cyst: a 10-year review.

Authors:  Kin Wai Edwin Chan; Kim Hung Lee; Siu Yan Bess Tsui; Jennifer Wai Cheung Mou; Yuk Him Peter Tam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis.

Authors:  Ken Catchpole; Colby Perkins; Catherine Bresee; M Jonathon Solnik; Benjamin Sherman; John Fritch; Bruno Gross; Samantha Jagannathan; Niv Hakami-Majd; Raymund Avenido; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Effectiveness of atrial fibrillation rotor ablation is dependent on conduction velocity: An in-silico 3-dimensional modeling study.

Authors:  Byounghyun Lim; Minki Hwang; Jun-Seop Song; Ah-Jin Ryu; Boyoung Joung; Eun Bo Shim; Hyungon Ryu; Hui-Nam Pak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Moderate-intensity versus high-intensity statin therapy in Korean patients with angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: A propensity-score matching analysis.

Authors:  Mahn-Won Park; Gyung-Min Park; Seungbong Han; Yujin Yang; Yong-Giun Kim; Jae-Hyung Roh; Hyun Woo Park; Jon Suh; Young-Rak Cho; Ki-Bum Won; Soe Hee Ann; Shin-Jae Kim; Dae-Won Kim; Sung Ho Her; Sang-Gon Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Robot-Assisted Surgery Uptake in the Pediatric Surgical Discipline.

Authors:  Nicolas Fernandez; Walid A Farhat
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2019-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.