Literature DB >> 26013128

Body Size, Fecundity, and Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Neotropical Cricket Macroanaxipha macilenta (Saussure) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).

R Cueva Del Castillo1.   

Abstract

Body size is directly or indirectly correlated with fitness. Body size, which conveys maximal fitness, often differs between sexes. Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) evolves because body size tends to be related to reproductive success through different pathways in males and females. In general, female insects are larger than males, suggesting that natural selection for high female fecundity could be stronger than sexual selection in males. I assessed the role of body size and fecundity in SSD in the Neotropical cricket Macroanaxipha macilenta (Saussure). This species shows a SSD bias toward males. Females did not present a correlation between number of eggs and body size. Nonetheless, there were fluctuations in the number of eggs carried by females during the sampling period, and the size of females that were collected carrying eggs was larger than that of females collected with no eggs. Since mating induces vitellogenesis in some cricket species, differences in female body size might suggest male mate choice. Sexual selection in the body size of males of M. macilenta may possibly be stronger than the selection of female fecundity. Even so, no mating behavior was observed during the field observations, including audible male calling or courtship songs, yet males may produce ultrasonic calls due to their size. If female body size in M. macilenta is not directly related to fecundity, the lack of a correlated response to selection on female body size could represent an alternate evolutionary pathway in the evolution of body size and SSD in insects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013128     DOI: 10.1007/s13744-014-0266-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neotrop Entomol        ISSN: 1519-566X            Impact factor:   1.434


  17 in total

1.  Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity.

Authors:  J P Reeve; D J Fairbairn
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects.

Authors:  Caroline S Awmack; Simon R Leather
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Climbing to reach females: Romeo should be small.

Authors:  Jordi Moya-Laraño; Juraj Halaj; David H Wise
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

Review 5.  The evolution of growth trajectories: what limits growth rate?

Authors:  Caitlin M Dmitriew
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-02

Review 6.  Allometry of behavior.

Authors:  Kenneth P Dial; Erick Greene; Duncan J Irschick
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: Hypotheses and tests.

Authors:  A V Hedrick; E J Temeles
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 8.  Plasticity in life-history traits.

Authors:  S Nylin; K Gotthard
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

9.  SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND REPRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT BY FEMALE SPIDERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS.

Authors:  John Prenter; Robert W Elwood; W Ian Montgomery
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.

Authors:  Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.