Literature DB >> 10651914

Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity.

J P Reeve1, D J Fairbairn.   

Abstract

Fecundity selection is often suggested as the main causal factor underlying the prevalence of female-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD), but this assumption has not been empirically tested. We selected female Drosophila melanogaster for increased or decreased fecundity (eggs laid over a single 18-h period, between days 5 and 7 posteclosion) for 20 generations, to see what effect this would have on SSD in three morphological traits (thorax width, abdomen width and thorax length). A direct response to fecundity selection was found in the downward direction (16.6%), whereas the response to upward selection (5.7%) was not statistically significant. Significant sex by selection interaction terms in the ANOVAs for thorax width and abdomen width indicate that the two sexes responded differently. Females usually showed a greater correlated response than males. In lines selected for increased fecundity, the correlated response in females for thorax and abdomen width was greater than the direct response in standard deviation units. SSD generally increased with selection for increased fecundity, but showed no consistent trend with selection for decreased fecundity. These results support the general hypothesis that SSD can evolve rapidly in response to fecundity selection. Selection on fecundity also produced correlated responses in life history traits. Downward selection resulted in flies that had lower viability and longevity, and both directions of selection were associated with an increase in development time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10651914     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00616.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  25 in total

1.  Resolving intralocus sexual conflict: genetic mechanisms and time frame.

Authors:  Andrew D Stewart; Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Stéphanie Bedhomme; N G Prasad; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Phenotypic plasticity of abdomen pigmentation in two geographic populations of Drosophila melanogaster: male-female comparison and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  P Gibert; B Moreteau; J R David
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Body Size, Fecundity, and Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Neotropical Cricket Macroanaxipha macilenta (Saussure) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).

Authors:  R Cueva Del Castillo
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 1.434

5.  Uncoupling the links between male mating tactics and female attractiveness.

Authors:  Alfredo F Ojanguren; Anne E Magurran
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Human fertility variation, size-related obstetrical performance and the evolution of sexual stature dimorphism.

Authors:  J F Guégan; A T Teriokhin; F Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Alison Pischedda; Andrew D Stewart; William R Rice
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Genetic variability of sexual size dimorphism in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale-line approach.

Authors:  Jean R David; Patricia Gibert; Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau; Hélène Legout; Georges Pétavy; Catherine Beaumont; Brigitte Moreteau
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Thermal adaptation in Drosophila serrata under conditions linked to its southern border: unexpected patterns from laboratory selection suggest limited evolutionary potential.

Authors:  Andréa Magiafoglou; Ary Hoffmann
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 10.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.