Literature DB >> 25092127

Audiogram of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) from 2 Hz to 9 kHz.

Evan M Hill1, Gimseong Koay, Rickye S Heffner, Henry E Heffner.   

Abstract

The pure-tone thresholds of four domestic female chickens were determined from 2 Hz to 9 kHz using the method of conditioned suppression/avoidance. At a level of 60 dB sound pressure level (re 20 μN/m(2)), their hearing range extends from 9.1 Hz to 7.2 kHz, with a best sensitivity of 2.6 dB at 2 kHz. Chickens have better sensitivity than humans for frequencies below 64 Hz; indeed, their sensitivity to infrasound exceeds that of the homing pigeon. However, when threshold testing moved to the lower frequencies, the animals required additional training before their final thresholds were obtained, suggesting that they may perceive frequencies below 64 Hz differently than higher frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25092127     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0929-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  21 in total

1.  A flexible connector for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Collateral behavior of the pigeon during conditioned suppression of key pecking.

Authors:  N Stein; H S Hoffman; C Stitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Hearing ranges of laboratory animals.

Authors:  Henry E Heffner; Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Origin of infrasound sensitive neurones in the papilla basilaris of the pigeon: an HRP study.

Authors:  L Schermuly; R Klinke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Development of absolute thresholds in chickens.

Authors:  L Gray; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Conditioned suppression/avoidance as a procedure for testing hearing in birds: the domestic pigeon (Columba livia).

Authors:  Henry E Heffner; Gimseong Koay; Evan M Hill; Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-06

7.  Free-field audiogram of the Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata).

Authors:  L L Jackson; R S Heffner; H E Heffner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Detection of atmospheric infrasound by homing pigeons.

Authors:  M L Yodlowski; M L Kreithen; W T Keeton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Infrasound responses in the midbrain of the guinea fowl.

Authors:  M Theurich; G Langner; H Scheich
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1984-08-24       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Hearing in the elephant (Elephas maximus): absolute sensitivity, frequency discrimination, and sound localization.

Authors:  R S Heffner; H E Heffner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1982-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  Audiogram of the mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) from 16 Hz to 9 kHz.

Authors:  Evan M Hill
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Comparative Auditory Neuroscience: Understanding the Evolution and Function of Ears.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-18

3.  Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings.

Authors:  George Ordiway; Miranda McDonnell; Sandesh Mohan; Jason Tait Sanchez
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.424

4.  Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) do not hear infrasound: the audiogram from 8 Hz to 10 kHz.

Authors:  Henry E Heffner; Gimseong Koay; Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The avian head induces cues for sound localization in elevation.

Authors:  Hans A Schnyder; Dieter Vanderelst; Sophia Bartenstein; Uwe Firzlaff; Harald Luksch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Distinct Neural Properties in the Low-Frequency Region of the Chicken Cochlear Nucleus Magnocellularis.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Hui Hong; David H Brown; Jason Tait Sanchez; Yuan Wang
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-04-11

7.  Low frequencies in the display vocalization of the Western Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus).

Authors:  Vlastimil Hart; Richard Policht; Vojtěch Jandák; Marek Brothánek; Hynek Burda
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Impact of Auditory Experience on the Structural Plasticity of the AIS in the Mouse Brainstem Throughout the Lifespan.

Authors:  Eun Jung Kim; Chenling Feng; Fidel Santamaria; Jun Hee Kim
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 5.505

9.  Change in the coding of interaural time difference along the tonotopic axis of the chicken nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Diverse Intrinsic Properties Shape Functional Phenotype of Low-Frequency Neurons in the Auditory Brainstem.

Authors:  Hui Hong; Xiaoyu Wang; Ting Lu; Diego A R Zorio; Yuan Wang; Jason Tait Sanchez
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.