Literature DB >> 27511020

Tonotopic Optimization for Temporal Processing in the Cochlear Nucleus.

Stefan N Oline1, Go Ashida2, R Michael Burger3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In the auditory system, sounds are processed in parallel frequency-tuned circuits, beginning in the cochlea. Auditory nerve fibers reflect this tonotopy and encode temporal properties of acoustic stimuli by "locking" discharges to a particular stimulus phase. However, physiological constraints on phase-locking depend on stimulus frequency. Interestingly, low characteristic frequency (LCF) neurons in the cochlear nucleus improve phase-locking precision relative to their auditory nerve inputs. This is proposed to arise through synaptic integration, but the postsynaptic membrane's selectivity for varying levels of synaptic convergence is poorly understood. The chick cochlear nucleus, nucleus magnocellularis (NM), exhibits tonotopic distribution of both input and membrane properties. LCF neurons receive many small inputs and have low input thresholds, whereas high characteristic frequency (HCF) neurons receive few, large synapses and require larger currents to spike. NM therefore presents an opportunity to study how small membrane variations interact with a systematic topographic gradient of synaptic inputs. We investigated membrane input selectivity and observed that HCF neurons preferentially select faster input than their LCF counterparts, and that this preference is tolerant of changes to membrane voltage. We then used computational models to probe which properties are crucial to phase-locking. The model predicted that the optimal arrangement of synaptic and membrane properties for phase-locking is specific to stimulus frequency and that the tonotopic distribution of input number and membrane excitability in NM closely tracks a stimulus-defined optimum. These findings were then confirmed physiologically with dynamic-clamp simulations of inputs to NM neurons. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: One way that neurons represent temporal information is by phase-locking, which is discharging in response to a particular phase of the stimulus waveform. In the auditory system, central neurons are optimized to retain or improve phase-locking precision compared with input from the auditory nerve. However, the difficulty of this computation varies systematically with stimulus frequency. We examined properties that contribute to temporal processing both physiologically and in a computational model. Neurons processing low-frequency input benefit from integration of many weak inputs, whereas those processing higher frequencies progressively lose precision by integration of multiple inputs. Here, we reveal general features of input-output optimization that apply to all neurons that process time varying input.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/368500-16$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear nucleus; phase-locking; synaptic convergence; tonotopy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27511020      PMCID: PMC4978807          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4449-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  71 in total

Review 1.  Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons.

Authors:  B Hutcheon; Y Yarom
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Accommodation enhances depolarizing inhibition in central neurons.

Authors:  P Monsivais; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Dynamic-clamp analysis of the effects of convergence on spike timing. II. Few synaptic inputs.

Authors:  Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Wade G Regehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Development of absolute thresholds in chickens.

Authors:  L Gray; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei in the chick: ontogeny of postsynaptic responses.

Authors:  H Jackson; J T Hackett; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1982-09-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Dynamic clamp: computer-generated conductances in real neurons.

Authors:  A A Sharp; M B O'Neil; L F Abbott; E Marder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Two-dimensional time coding in the auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Matthew H Higgs; Adrienne L Fairhall; William J Spain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.709

9.  Inhibitory properties underlying non-monotonic input-output relationship in low-frequency spherical bushy neurons of the gerbil.

Authors:  Thomas Kuenzel; Jana Nerlich; Hermann Wagner; Rudolf Rübsamen; Ivan Milenkovic
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Theoretical foundations of the sound analog membrane potential that underlies coincidence detection in the barn owl.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Kazuo Funabiki; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  11 in total

1.  Postsynaptic FMRP Regulates Synaptogenesis In Vivo in the Developing Cochlear Nucleus.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Diego A R Zorio; Leslayann Schecterson; Yong Lu; Yuan Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Structural and Functional Refinement of the Axon Initial Segment in Avian Cochlear Nucleus during Development.

Authors:  Nargis Akter; Ryota Fukaya; Ryota Adachi; Hiroshi Kawabe; Hiroshi Kuba
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Intrinsic physiology of inhibitory neurons changes over auditory development.

Authors:  Briana J Carroll; Richard Bertram; Richard L Hyson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A computational analysis of signal fidelity in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  Alison Boxwell; David Terman; Marion Frank; Yuchio Yanagawa; Joseph B Travers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Activity-dependent formation and location of voltage-gated sodium channel clusters at a CNS nerve terminal during postnatal development.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Emmanuelle Berret; Jun Hee Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Expression and Neurotransmitter Association of the Synaptic Calcium Sensor Synaptotagmin in the Avian Auditory Brain Stem.

Authors:  Katrina M MacLeod; Sangeeta Pandya
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-23

7.  Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings.

Authors:  George Ordiway; Miranda McDonnell; Sandesh Mohan; Jason Tait Sanchez
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.424

8.  Ion channel mechanisms underlying frequency-firing patterns of the avian nucleus magnocellularis: A computational model.

Authors:  Ting Lu; Kirstie Wade; Hui Hong; Jason Tait Sanchez
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Distinct Neural Properties in the Low-Frequency Region of the Chicken Cochlear Nucleus Magnocellularis.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Hui Hong; David H Brown; Jason Tait Sanchez; Yuan Wang
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-04-11

10.  Your genes decide what you are listening to.

Authors:  Conny Kopp-Scheinpflug
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.581

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.