Literature DB >> 23522456

Valuing postoperative recovery: validation of the SF-6D health-state utility.

Lawrence Lee1, Nathaniel Elfassy, Chao Li, Eric Latimer, A Sender Liberman, Patrick Charlebois, Barry Stein, Franco Carli, Gerald M Fried, Liane S Feldman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many surgical innovations are costly but may result in faster patient recovery. Economic analyses of these innovations require utility measures that reflect the construct of "postoperative recovery." We investigated the validity of Short Form 6D (SF-6D) utility value as a measure of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection completed the Short Form 36 and the 6-min walk test at baseline (before surgery) and at 4 and 8 wk postoperatively. SF-6D utilities were derived from the Short Form 36. Longitudinal validity (responsiveness) was assessed using standardized response means (SRM). Construct validity was assessed by comparing the difference in mean SF-6D between patients with and without complications (discriminant) and by correlating the SF-6D with other measures of recovery (convergent).
RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were included (58% male; mean age 63.0 (SD 14.2) y, 81% malignancy, and 54% laparoscopic). SF-6D values dropped significantly from baseline to 4 wk after surgery (SRM -0.54, P < 0.001) and returned to baseline by 8 wk (SRM -0.12, P = 0.111). At 4 wk after surgery, the SF-6D was lower in patients with complications than in those without (mean difference -0.047, 95% CI -0.088, -0.006). At all time points, the SF-6D correlated significantly with the physical and mental component scales of the SF-36 (Pearson r 0.67-0.80, all P < 0.001) and the 6-min walk test (r 0.21-0.29, all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The SF-6D is a valid measure of postoperative recovery following elective colorectal resection and may be used to measure quality-adjusted life years for cost-effectiveness analyses of surgical technologies and interventions hypothesized to impact recovery.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Health economics; Postoperative recovery; Quality-adjusted life years; SF-6D; Utility

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522456     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  5 in total

1.  How well are we measuring postoperative "recovery" after abdominal surgery?

Authors:  Lawrence Lee; Teodora Dumitra; Julio F Fiore; Nancy E Mayo; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Using a personalized measure (Patient Generated Index (PGI)) to identify what matters to people with cancer.

Authors:  Ala' S Aburub; B Gagnon; A M Rodríguez; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Development of a patient-reported outcome measure of recovery after abdominal surgery: a hypothesized conceptual framework.

Authors:  Roshni Alam; Sabrina M Figueiredo; Saba Balvardi; Bénédicte Nauche; Tara Landry; Lawrence Lee; Nancy E Mayo; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Margot E Lodge; Chris Moran; Adam D J Sutton; Hui-Ching Lee; Jugdeep K Dhesi; Nadine E Andrew; Darshini R Ayton; David J Hunter-Smith; Velandai K Srikanth; David A Snowdon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Systematic review of health state utility values for economic evaluation of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kim Jeong; John Cairns
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-08-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.