Literature DB >> 35239096

The impact of bowel dysfunction on health-related quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review.

F Al Rashid1, A S Liberman2, P Charlebois2, B Stein2, L S Feldman3, J F Fiore3, L Lee2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery have an important impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), but that relationship is complex. A better understanding of this relationship allows for better informed shared decision-making about surgery. Our objective was to perform a systematic review to determine which HRQOL domains are most affected by postoperative bowel dysfunction.
METHODS: A systematic review of the CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included studies that evaluated bowel function after sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery and assessed HRQOL using a validated instrument. The quality of HRQOL analysis was assessed using an 11-item checklist. The main outcome was the impact bowel dysfunction had on global and domain specific quality-of-life indices. The impact was evaluated for clinical relevance using the Minimum Clinical Important Difference (MCID) for each specific HRQOL instrument.
RESULTS: Out of 952 unique citations, 103 studies were full-text reviews. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria (4 prospective cohorts and 9 cross-sectional studies). Of the 15 studies with long-term follow-up, the time to assessment after surgery ranged from 1.2 to 14.6 years. The low anterior resection syndrome score and European Organization for Research and Treatment core quality-of-life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) were the most commonly used instruments. Medium and large magnitudes in MCID were seen for global health, social functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. Among included studies, the most consistently reported functional domains affected by bowel function were social functioning and emotional functioning.
CONCLUSIONS: Following sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery, poor bowel function mainly affects the social and emotional functional domains of HRQOL, which in turn impact global scores. This finding can help inform patients about expected changes in HRQOL after rectal cancer surgery and facilitate individualized treatment decisions.
© 2022. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel dysfunction; Health-related quality of life; Low anterior resection syndrome; Postoperative outcomes; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35239096     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02594-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.699


  44 in total

Review 1.  Are quality of life measures patient centred?

Authors:  A J Carr; I J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

2.  How well are we measuring postoperative "recovery" after abdominal surgery?

Authors:  Lawrence Lee; Teodora Dumitra; Julio F Fiore; Nancy E Mayo; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; J Singer; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-12

4.  PROMS and LARS - will functional outcomes trump cancer survival?: Rectal cancer surgery has focussed on local recurrence and cancer survival. Will patient choice drive the options in the future?

Authors:  Felix Aigner
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Predicting the Risk of Bowel-Related Quality-of-Life Impairment After Restorative Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Nick J Battersby; Therese Juul; Peter Christensen; Ahmed Z Janjua; Graham Branagan; Katrine J Emmertsen; Christine Norton; Robert Hughes; Søren Laurberg; Brendan J Moran
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Lyndal Trevena; Don Nutbeam; Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life.

Authors:  A Bowling
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  A meta-analysis of the prevalence of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and systematic review of risk factors.

Authors:  Alexander D Croese; James M Lonie; Alexandra F Trollope; Venkat N Vangaveti; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  What do these scores mean? Presenting patient-reported outcomes data to patients and clinicians to improve interpretability.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Katherine C Smith; Elissa T Bantug; Elliott E Tolbert; Amanda L Blackford; Michael D Brundage
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21
View more
  1 in total

1.  Does the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score Accurately Represent the Impact of Bowel Dysfunction on Health-Related Quality of Life?

Authors:  Anna Wang; Stephan Robitaille; Sender Liberman; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.267

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.