BACKGROUND: Isolation-based practices in nursing homes (NHs) differ from those in acute care. NHs must promote quality of life while preventing infection transmission. Practices used in NHs to reconcile these goals of care have not been characterised. PURPOSE: To explore decision-making in isolation-based infection prevention and control practices in NHs. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted with staff (eg, staff nurses, infection prevention directors and directors of nursing) employed in purposefully sampled US NHs. Semistructured, role-specific interview guides were developed and interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using directed content analysis. The research team discussed emerging themes in weekly meetings to confirm consensus. RESULTS: We inferred from 73 interviews in 10 NHs that there was variation between NHs in practices regarding who was isolated, when isolation-based practices took place, how they were implemented, and how they were tailored for each resident. Interviewees' decision-making depended on staff perceptions of acceptable transmission risk and resident quality of life. NH resources also influenced decision-making, including availability of private rooms, extent to which staff can devote time to isolation-based practices and communication tools. A lack of understanding of key infection prevention and control concepts was also revealed. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Current clinical guidelines are not specific enough to ensure consistent practice that meets care goals and resource constraints in NHs. However, new epidemiological research regarding effectiveness of varying isolation practices in this setting is needed to inform clinical practice. Further, additional infection prevention and control education for NH staff may be required. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Isolation-based practices in nursing homes (NHs) differ from those in acute care. NHs must promote quality of life while preventing infection transmission. Practices used in NHs to reconcile these goals of care have not been characterised. PURPOSE: To explore decision-making in isolation-based infection prevention and control practices in NHs. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted with staff (eg, staff nurses, infection prevention directors and directors of nursing) employed in purposefully sampled US NHs. Semistructured, role-specific interview guides were developed and interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using directed content analysis. The research team discussed emerging themes in weekly meetings to confirm consensus. RESULTS: We inferred from 73 interviews in 10 NHs that there was variation between NHs in practices regarding who was isolated, when isolation-based practices took place, how they were implemented, and how they were tailored for each resident. Interviewees' decision-making depended on staff perceptions of acceptable transmission risk and resident quality of life. NH resources also influenced decision-making, including availability of private rooms, extent to which staff can devote time to isolation-based practices and communication tools. A lack of understanding of key infection prevention and control concepts was also revealed. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Current clinical guidelines are not specific enough to ensure consistent practice that meets care goals and resource constraints in NHs. However, new epidemiological research regarding effectiveness of varying isolation practices in this setting is needed to inform clinical practice. Further, additional infection prevention and control education for NH staff may be required. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Decision making; Infection control; Nosocomial infections; Nursing homes
Authors: Donna M Schora; Susan Boehm; Sanchita Das; Parul A Patel; Jennifer O'Brien; Carolyn Hines; Deborah Burdsall; Jennifer Beaumont; Kari Peterson; Maureen Fausone; Lance R Peterson Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Catherine C Cohen; Carolyn T A Herzig; Eileen J Carter; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Elaine L Larson; Patricia W Stone Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Patricia W Stone; Carolyn T A Herzig; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Eileen Carter; Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir; Patricia K Semeraro; Catherine C Cohen; Jasmine Travers; Steven Schweon Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 2.361
Authors: Ghinwa Dumyati; Nimalie D Stone; David A Nace; Christopher J Crnich; Robin L P Jump Journal: Curr Infect Dis Rep Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.725
Authors: Patricia W Stone; Carolyn T A Herzig; Mansi Agarwal; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Andrew W Dick Journal: Inquiry Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: Andrea Iaboni; Amy Cockburn; Meghan Marcil; Kevin Rodrigues; Cecelia Marshall; Mary Anne Garcia; Hannah Quirt; Katelyn B Reynolds; Ron Keren; Alastair J Flint Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 4.105